SIC Reserved Seats Case | Bilal Athar Kayani Raises Huge Questions

2 months ago

#OffTheRecord #ImranKhan #PTI #ReservedSeats #KashifAbbasi #ElectionCommission #SupremeCourt #QaziFeazIsa #JusticeAtharMinallah #humayunmohmand #BilalAtharKayani

SIC Reserved Seats Case | Bilal Athar Kayani Raises Huge Questions

Transcript

00:00Dr. Mayim Momin, Senator Bilal Kiani, MNA Muslim League, have you seen the Reserved Seats?

00:10It is a big deal that the Reserved Seats have been decided. What is the sense?

00:16In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful.

00:19See, the real problem with the Reserved Seats starts with the removal of the flag.

00:25Now remember, all these people quote Article 9, 209, 2010, and especially 215 of the Election Act 2017.

00:36In 215, basically, in its sub-section 5, it says that if you are not complete on Article 209, 2010, then the flag is removed from you.

00:49Agreed?

00:50But the case is not about the flag.

00:51Agreed. Listen now.

00:52But you have taken it wrong.

00:53Listen. No. Whether or not you have taken it wrong, that is a different matter.

00:58Now, it is not written anywhere that if the flag is taken back, then you are free.

01:05You are not a political party.

01:06You are not. Now, Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf, remember, if you have taken the flag, then you are free. No problem.

01:12Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf has fought without its flag.

01:17But you cannot even fight as a party.

01:19No. This was a misinterpretation of the Election Commission of the Election Act 2017.

01:26The problem is here.

01:27You have misinterpreted the Supreme Court's decision.

01:29No. The Supreme Court has taken the flag from you.

01:33And they have said that because they have taken it, you are no longer a political party.

01:36No. This is wrong.

01:37This is wrong.

01:38Because, basically, they have said that the symbol has been removed from you. The symbol has been removed from us.

01:42We have got a different symbol.

01:43Someone has got something. Someone has got a bangle.

01:46Someone has got a shoe. Someone has got a car.

01:48Now, we, Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf, as a political party, we fought on a different symbol.

01:54It's not one symbol.

01:55So, the problem in that was the misinterpretation.

01:59Now, one night before, you tell me that you are a constitutional body.

02:03You tell me that you are Humayun. You are independent.

02:05One night before, you tell me that you are independent.

02:08Now, you tell me that in the next 1-2-3 days, I have to arrange all these things for myself.

02:13So, for that, I have to go to Bukhara.

02:15You know that when you gave the ticket for Nazriyati, the press release of the Election Commission came that you are a party representative.

02:24Exactly.

02:25So, you cannot fight anyone else.

02:26Exactly.

02:27In those circumstances, everyone felt that we should be free.

02:31One more thing.

02:32You know that all those who fought, they had given 2-3 forms.

02:39So, you look at all of them.

02:41So, this is the real problem.

02:43There was also a debate in the court that when the chairman of the Sunni Ijtihad Council did not have any restrictions on him,

02:47when he did not have any decision to take his symbol,

02:49when he submitted his documents, why was he released?

02:53He could have been released.

02:55See, the problem is here.

02:58It is the biased interpretation of the Election Commission of Pakistan.

03:05Exactly.

03:06In this, if you want to do it, you have to do one thing.

03:08I think Justice Mansoor Al-Isha gave a hint.

03:12You give three days from today.

03:14Yes.

03:15And they will decide where to go.

03:16And they will decide where to go.

03:17This has also happened.

03:18Yes.

03:19In the name of Allah, good morning, Mr. Kashmi.

03:20Brother, the seat is ours.

03:22Mr. Kashmi, thank you very much for inviting me to your show.

03:24See, the thing is that in the PTI, Mashallah, there are very famous lawmakers.

03:30They are sitting on the front row of the National Assembly.

03:34There is Mr. Gauhar.

03:35Sometimes Mr. Lateef Khosa also comes.

03:37Then there is Mr. Ali Zafar.

03:39And then there is a former Speaker of the National Assembly.

03:43So these people did not know these basic laws of the Sunni Ijtihad Council while joining the Jamaat,

03:48that they will not be able to.

03:50It is there in black and white.

03:52So they knew exactly what they did.

03:54And after that they said that if we make noise, we will be harmed.

03:57See, that is a separate case of your symbol.

03:59Whether or not there is a justice-political Jamaat, this is not a prayer of the Supreme Court.

04:04Exactly.

04:05But this came during the proceedings when they were asked that why did you close the PTI?

04:09The election commission did not have an answer there.

04:11We found out that six or eight people, I heard there are eleven people like this,

04:14who did not participate in the SIC and they are the PTI.

04:18Now the question is that if you have interpreted this wrongly,

04:22the PTI is present, why were they not given the option that this PTI is a political party and they should go into it?

04:27Which is an original sin.

04:28That is why I think what they are saying is that this is also an argument to fix the original sin.

04:33Because this was never the intention of the Supreme Court.

04:36And that is a complete justice argument.

04:38This is one argument and the other is that it was a letter of the law.

04:41No, but the second thing is that after the election,

04:43was there anything that was stopping them from participating in the PTI?

04:46Decisions of the Supreme Court.

04:48Conditions.

04:49Election commission.

04:50But Mr. Kashyap, one more thing.

04:52Sir, one second.

04:53This is a very simple argument.

04:55Listen, listen.

04:56You have made a long argument.

04:57You have made a long argument.

04:58I have to go.

04:59You are waiting for the decision.

05:00No, no, sir.

05:01Listen to me.

05:02If you had gone,

05:03you had three days to join the political party,

05:05to take the reserve seats.

05:07And the Supreme Court would have said, no, we do not agree.

05:09They would have released everyone.

05:11After a month or two, their system would have collapsed.

05:14They had a lot of things to think about.

05:16No, but they specifically decided to choose a party,

05:18which under the laws,

05:20clearly,

05:21which has never collected any money.

05:23So you think,

05:24if they did not follow the procedure,

05:25then why did they meet?

05:26No, no.

05:27Absolutely.

05:28Absolutely.

05:29Absolutely.

05:30Absolutely.

SIC Reserved Seats Case | Bilal Athar Kayani Raises Huge Questions

Category

Transcript

Recommended