Moletlanyi Tshipa (09-01-2020): Obtaining SubAtomic Particle Sizes From Creation-Annihilation Processes
(1)
https://www.physicsjournal.in/archives/2020.v2.i1.A.25/obtaining-subatomic-particle-sizes-from-creation-annihilation-processes
(2)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340538915_Obtaining_subatomic_particle_sizes_from_creation-annihilation_processes
Riccardo C. Storti (July-2020):
(*) Analysis of The Particle-AntiParticle Pair Representation (PAPPR) of Fundamental-Particle Sizes (Solution Algorithm)
(*) Developed by Moletlanyi Tshipa
(*) Pg. 12, 14-20:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343300204_Analysis_of_The_Particle-Antiparticle_Pair_Representation_PAPPR_developed_by_Moletlanyi_Tshipa_of_Fundamental-Particle_Sizes_Solution_Algorithm
(1)
https://www.physicsjournal.in/archives/2020.v2.i1.A.25/obtaining-subatomic-particle-sizes-from-creation-annihilation-processes
(2)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340538915_Obtaining_subatomic_particle_sizes_from_creation-annihilation_processes
Riccardo C. Storti (July-2020):
(*) Analysis of The Particle-AntiParticle Pair Representation (PAPPR) of Fundamental-Particle Sizes (Solution Algorithm)
(*) Developed by Moletlanyi Tshipa
(*) Pg. 12, 14-20:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343300204_Analysis_of_The_Particle-Antiparticle_Pair_Representation_PAPPR_developed_by_Moletlanyi_Tshipa_of_Fundamental-Particle_Sizes_Solution_Algorithm
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00G'day viewers, in this episode we establish five significant outcomes. Number one, very importantly
00:06we accomplish a key research objective which Schipper was unable to achieve, that is relating
00:12spin angular momentum to particle radio. Number two, we show that spin angular momentum derived
00:19particle radius decreases as mass moment of inertia increases. Number three, our spin angular
00:26momentum particle radio derivation does not contain any electric or magnetic information,
00:31hence it cannot be interpreted as being related to any electromagnetically associated radio values.
00:38Number four, the proton may be modeled as a rotating disk yielding a particle radius to
00:43within 0.08 percent of the authoritative experimentally verified benchmark presented.
00:49Number five, the neutron may be modeled as a rotating hollow sphere yielding a particle radius
00:55to within 0.008 percent of the authoritative experimentally verified benchmark presented.
01:02Okay let's get into it. Let's begin our journey by identifying where the Schipper research article
01:09can be found as we did in episode 98. Now that you know where to find the primary artifacts
01:15let's fix Schipper's spin angular momentum problem which we identified in the previous episode.
01:21If you have not already watched episode 98 please pause this presentation and watch the previous
01:26episode before proceeding. Well assuming that you have followed my instructions let's move on.
01:32The particle radii derivation process is remarkably simple by leveraging off episode 98.
01:37Once again we urge all viewers to review episode 98 prior to proceeding. Okay let's walk through
01:44the process in a stepwise manner. Step one, formulate an expression for the total energy
01:50of the rotating energy ring as depicted in episode 98. Step two, assume that the total energy of x sub
01:58n particles equals the propagation energy of x sub gamma photons. Step three, execute the following
02:06substitutions. Assume all physical measurements occur in a co-moving linear frame of reference.
02:12Step four, assume x sub n equals x sub gamma and solve for r. Step five, utilizing the spin angular
02:21momentum equation execute the following substitutions into step four with respect to
02:26baryons. Please note that beta and lambda sub beta have vanished from the solution. Step six,
02:34the radii for all baryons is given by the absolute value of the equation defined in step five.
02:40Step seven, from episode 98 we know that all meson and boson radii must be given by the relationship
02:46shown. Step eight, evaluate particle radii solutions utilizing common mass moments of
02:52inertia configuration coefficients. Example mass moments of inertia appear below. Please note that
02:58hoops may be considered to be massive strings. Let's now look at some spin angular momentum
03:04generated particle radii results. Our spin angular momentum generated particle radii results
03:10based upon Schipper's original particle listing exhibit the following characteristics. Number one,
03:16radius decreases as mass moment of inertia increases. Number two, they do not contain
03:22any electric or magnetic information hence they cannot be interpreted as being related to any
03:28electromagnetically associated radii values. Okay, so how do we interpret the physical meaning of
03:34these spin angular momentum generated particle radii? To answer this question we shall utilize
03:40established experimental benchmarks to act as frames of reference. It may seem astonishing to
03:45many viewers but there are only two particles which have had their physical dimensions measured
03:50to high precision, that is the proton and neutron. Even then, of these two particles, neutron size
03:55measurements are not as straightforward or precise as the proton. We shall utilize the experimentally
04:01verified exact analytical solutions published by Storti in 2007, then again in 2009 by Storti and
04:08Desiato as our benchmarks. Moreover, we recommend all viewers to watch episode 5 on this channel
04:14for a video presentation pertaining to the formal derivation of the zero point field equilibrium radii
04:20appearing on screen. It should be noted that the zero point field equilibrium radii we derive
04:25coincide with the proton root mean square charge radius and the neutron mean square charge radius.
04:31This means that the zero point field equilibrium radii equations appearing on screen
04:36may be considered to be authoritative and definitive. At the bottom of the screen we compare
04:41our spin angular momentum solution to the benchmark zero point field equilibrium radii solutions
04:47appearing mid-screen. Our results show that the dissimilarity between table 2 and the experimentally
04:53verified benchmarks are minimized as indicated by the purple emphasis. In the case of the proton,
04:59the best fit occurs when i sub x equals a half, such that the deviation from the experimentally
05:05verified benchmark is less than 0.08 percent. In the case of the neutron, the best fit occurs when
05:12i sub x equals two-thirds, such that the deviation from the experimentally verified benchmark is less
05:18than 0.008 percent. Okay, let's now summarize what we have learned. On our journey we have learned five
05:26significant lessons. Number one, we have accomplished a key SHIPA research objective, that is
05:32relating spin angular momentum to particle radii. Number two, particle radius decreases as mass
05:38moment of inertia increases. Number three, our spin angular momentum particle radii derivation does not
05:45contain any electric or magnetic information, hence it cannot be interpreted as being related to
05:50any electromagnetically associated radii values. Number four, the proton may be modeled as a rotating
05:57disk yielding a particle radius to within 0.08 percent of the experimentally verified benchmark.
06:04Number five, the neutron may be modeled as a rotating hollow sphere yielding a particle radius
06:10to within 0.008 percent of the experimentally verified benchmark.