During a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) questioned the Executive Director of the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council Eric Beightel about permitting reforms and coordination.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Thank you, Senator Rosen. Senator Carper, you're recognized for your questions.
00:03Thanks, thanks so much. Mr. Badel, I understand we've discussed how your name
00:08is pronounced and it's Badel with a, I guess a D, is that right? It's Badel. Badel, okay.
00:14We welcome you. I understand your wife Hillary is with you. Would you raise your
00:18hand, ma'am? All right, I understand you got some children here, a daughter. Ainsley,
00:23is that you? Ainsley, raise your hand, Ainsley, go ahead. All right, and Ainsley, do you
00:27have a brother? What's his name? All right, Max, to the max. And Ainsley, do you
00:35have any grandparents here? Are these your parents? That's a
00:41question. Are these your parents? All right, good. All right, well we thank you
00:47all for coming. My first question is, and I ask variations of this question, but if
00:52you try to get people to explain complex concepts, I say, how would you
00:57explain this to your grandparents? I say, how would you explain this or that to
01:02your grandparents? I'm gonna say, how would you explain what you do to your
01:05in-laws? The simplest way to explain what we do is that we are a, we're an agency
01:14that provides coordination among the various federal agencies that are
01:17responsible for permitting big infrastructure projects. And what we do
01:21is provide transparency and predictability and accountability to
01:24the permitting process. Many times people don't understand the various steps that
01:29go into permitting a big infrastructure project, and what we do is break it down
01:33into the individual steps and the milestones to achieve those, those
01:38permits, and provide a timeline for the accomplishment of that task. And so
01:43people can look at it and understand if it starts on day one, we have until day
01:48365 to achieve this outcome. I'm looking at your in-laws and thumbs up, thumbs down,
01:55what do you think? All right. They're rolling their eyes. I get that a lot, Senator.
02:01Not really. I see you're drawing over your left shoulders. I just come from the
02:06Environment and Public Works Committee. We're just having a hearing on the Key
02:10Bridge, you know, the bridge in Baltimore that was badly damaged, and I'm gonna
02:15slip back over there as soon as I get to ask some more questions.
02:20Rebecca Higgins, who's a longtime member of the Environment and Public Works Committee,
02:24helped us write big parts of the Inflation Reduction Act, which was hugely
02:28helpful during my tenure in the committee. So Rebecca, it's nice to see you.
02:33My question, last year the Environment and Public Works Committee held, I think
02:39not one, but a couple of hearings on permitting. Common theme at our hearings
02:44was the importance of public engagement, as you may know. We learned that when
02:48project sponsors understand community concerns early in the process, sponsors
02:54can often include solutions in the project's design. Public engagement can
03:00build trust, it can increase public buy-in, can help resolve issues, can help
03:05prevent litigation, and ultimately it can save time and money. My question, based on
03:12your experience, how does community engagement facilitate timely completion
03:18of reviews and improve permitting outcomes? I appreciate that question,
03:25Senator. The, you know, early and meaningful engagement is a kind of
03:30foundational piece of effective environmental review. The bipartisan
03:35permitting reform implementation rule, the NEPA Phase 2 rule, emphasizes early
03:40public engagement as part of the NEPA process. What we do at the Permitting
03:44Council for our Fast 41 covered projects is ensure that we are providing
03:48transparent information to the public about the project and its status in the
03:53permitting process. Ultimately, the earlier you engage with affected
03:59stakeholders and have meaningful conversations with them to identify
04:03their concerns and also potential issues on a project, the better you are able to
04:09incorporate those concerns into project design, into the analysis, to ensure that
04:14you are identifying alternatives that will not result in avoidable impacts
04:22that would then trigger further complications down the road. The earlier
04:26you engage, the sooner you identify the issues, the earlier you can resolve them.
04:29What often happens without early engagement and meaningful public
04:33involvement is that issues will emerge later in the process that you could have
04:38identified sooner that will have a much more material effect on the permitting
04:42timeline. If you can identify early and resolve them early, you can have much
04:47more predictability, and at the end of the day, project sponsors are willing to
04:51account for a slightly longer timeline if they know that it's going to be
04:55longer. The unpredictability of unexpected delays is what can really
04:59cause problems. I'm reminded of a hearing that we held before the
05:03Environment and Public Works Committee. I think it was late last year, maybe late
05:07last year, and the issue of what can we do to ensure better outcomes in
05:18projects. We had a wide range of witnesses, different views. You
05:23wouldn't expect them to agree on something like this, and they all came
05:26back in their testimony and said we're better off when we hear
05:32community concerns at the beginning of the process rather than at the end.
05:38Let me ask a second question with respect to the Inflation Reduction Act funds.
05:46As you mentioned in your testimony, the Inflation Reduction Act included some
05:51$350 million, with an M, million dollars, the Environmental Review Improvement Fund,
05:59which we created, as you'll recall, in the FAST-41 Act. Oftentimes when federal
06:04agencies have adequate resources, permitting is more efficient, and my
06:09question is now how has the $350 million from the Inflation Reduction Act for the
06:14Environmental Review Improvement Fund, how has that helped the permitting
06:19council support other federal agencies, states, and tribes in improving permitting
06:25reviews? And if you could give us a couple of examples. Absolutely. So we have
06:31provided $165 million to federal agencies to increase capacity at those
06:37agencies, whether that be hiring FTEs at the agency, contract support, or other
06:43tools, templates that they can develop to improve the efficiency and timeliness of
06:47the environment review permitting process. We've also invested $30 million
06:51in IT solutions at the agencies to help them build, modernize, I should say, their
06:58IT infrastructure to bring it into the 21st century in many cases. There is, you
07:04know, an example that I like to cite is that the Coast Guard used to use a
07:07Microsoft Word document for their bridge permit application, and with the
07:11investments that we've made at the Coast Guard, they're actually making an online
07:13portal for the bridge application, which will make it much more efficient for
07:17review and intake of those permitting actions. We've also provided funds to
07:22tribes who are engaged in the environment review and permitting for
07:27FAST-41 covered projects through our Tribal Assistance Program. Mr. Chairman, if
07:33I can, can I do a follow-up question? How is the permitting council using the
07:38environmental review improvement funds to promote early and meaningful community
07:43engagement? So our tools that we are investing in at the agencies and the
07:49resources that we are investing in will enable the agencies to do more
07:54meaningful outreach. It will make the process more transparent for project
07:59applicants and the public. We are also obviously using our dashboard to provide
08:05vital information to the public on the status of the projects. Also, you know, I
08:10mentioned the Tribal Assistance Program. That is all about engagement with tribes
08:14who are engaged in FAST-41 program. Okay, good, thanks. I have a bunch of other
08:19questions I have, and I'll submit those for the record. I need to get back to my
08:23other committee. Mr. Chairman, thanks for letting me jump in here. I want to
08:28say to your children again, I love it when folks, witnesses, bring spouses,
08:34children, in-laws, and it's a family affair. I just want to say to your kids,
08:39how old are your kids? They're 9 and 11. Who's 9? Daughter? Max. Yeah, son 11.
08:46Let me talk to the two of you just for a second, okay? We have, as you know, 50
08:52states. 50 states. He's our chairman. He's our leader on this committee. He's from
08:57the state of Michigan. I'm from the state of Delaware, although I'm a huge fan of
09:01the Detroit Tigers, as he knows. And we're happy about that.
09:06But we have, just for your kids, we have 50 states. Every state has two
09:12United States senators, and our job is to help make the rules for the country.
09:17That's what we do. We help make the rules for the country. And we don't do this by
09:21ourselves. We have a lot of people helping us who are sitting behind us and in the
09:25audience as well. But that's what we do, help make the rules for the country. And
09:29we're delighted to have a chance to work with your dad, your husband, your
09:33son-in-law in this effort. This is important stuff. This is
09:37important stuff for our country today and going forward. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:42Thank you, Senator Carper. Hopefully they'll both get extra credit for school
09:46today. This is a civics lesson that's...