Mitch McConnell Calls For Major Changes To 'Grossly Insufficient' Defense Spending Package

  • 2 months ago
During remarks on the Senate floor, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) spoke about defense appropriation negotiations.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Matter today the Appropriations Committee is considering defense funding for the coming year.
00:06From the outset, colleagues who take seriously our obligation to provide for the common defense
00:13knew that they had their work cut out for them. This spring, the President sent them a fourth
00:19straight defense request that would cut funding for the National Defense after Fletcher. The
00:26request was grossly insufficient when it went to print. It's even more so today.
00:36Then the summer brought our closest allies and partners here to Washington,
00:43underscoring the importance of American leadership by example. And just a few days ago,
00:50a final report of the Commission on National Defense Strategy put an even finer point
00:56on the stakes of the growing and interconnected threats to our national security. As I discussed
01:04earlier this week, the bipartisan expert panel behind the report delivered a grave warning.
01:11Here's more of what they said. The U.S. military, quote,
01:18lacks both the capabilities and the capacity required to be confident it can deter and prevail
01:30in combat. The American public have been, quote, again, according to the report,
01:38inadequately, inadequately informed by government leaders of the threats to U.S. interests,
01:45including to people's everyday lives and what will be required to restore American global power
01:53and leadership. They went on further. Very little progress will be possible without Congress,
01:59where a relatively small number of elected officials have imposed
02:04continual political gamesmanship over thoughtful and responsible legislating and oversight.
02:12Goodness. It's past time to prioritize our national security. It's totally obvious to all of us
02:22this needs to begin. Just take the patient threat from China, for example. Plenty of our colleagues
02:29on both sides of the aisle like to talk about outcompeting the PRC, but not as many seem to
02:38recognize that winning this competition, preserving American promise, and protecting America's
02:45interests are first and foremost about investing in hard power. As the commission put it,
02:55China has, quote, largely negated the U.S. military advantage in the Western Pacific
03:03through two decades of focused military investment. Without significant change by
03:10the United States, the balance of power will continue to shift in China's favor.
03:17But the vast majority of supposed counter China policies that folks in Washington like to talk
03:24about won't do much to address, to arrest the shift. And neither will pretending that pacing
03:34threat is the only threat we face. It's naive to believe we can ignore or assume away threats in
03:42other regions. Anyone who believes our security and prosperity don't require urgent investments
03:47in hard power, in alliances and partnerships, and in our defense industrial base clearly don't know
03:56what they're talking about. So I'm grateful to my friend, Vice Chair Collins, and to colleagues
04:04on the Appropriations Committee who recognize the urgency of the task in front of us.
04:10They're fighting hard to negate as much of the President's real dollar cut to national defense
04:17as they could. The bill in committee right now exceeds the President's request by nearly $19
04:24billion. This is less than the additional $25 billion authorized by the Armed Services Committee.
04:33Senate Democrats refuse to spend more on defense without adding funding for non-defense discretionary
04:39programs. However, thanks to our colleagues' efforts, this bill secures crucial steps forward
04:48on a number of urgent priorities. The bill includes the largest ever appropriation for shipbuilding,
04:57with hundreds of millions in new resources for growing and retaining the critical ship
05:02building industrial base. It tackles maintenance backlogs head-on and invests in enough spare
05:11components to bring 500 more aircraft to full readiness than the President's request
05:18accounts for. It goes $3 billion beyond his request for overdue investments in expanding
05:25the defense industrial base and provides for modernizing ammunition and vehicle production
05:31facilities from Iowa and Missouri to Ohio and Tennessee. And it delivers important downpayments
05:40on critical munitions from the long-range and precision strike capabilities needed in the
05:46Indo-Pacific to the naval interceptors required to defend U.S. personnel and global commerce from
05:54terrorist attacks in the Red Sea. But let's be absolutely clear when it comes to rebuilding our
06:04stockpiles and preparing our armed forces to deter and defeat threats. There is much, much more work
06:15to be done. There is no serious reading of post-World War II history that doesn't trace
06:21the preservation of Western peace or the growth of American prosperity to an order
06:28underpinned by American strength. The U.S. military is the reason our neighbors back home sleep in
06:36peace. It's the reason our communities reap the benefits of global trade. It's the weight
06:44behind our leader's words. We cannot afford to shortchange it
06:51and I cannot make the stakes of the task before us any more clear.

Recommended