Kia Reserved Seats se Mutaliq Aqliati Raye Faislay Par Amal Mein Rukawat bansakti Hai?
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
01:30The court has decided to include a new clause in the ruling, which states that in a majority decision, all the rules of the law and the fundamental parts of the ruling have been ignored.
01:43The accused, 39 and 41, take any step on the basis of this ruling, which is not in accordance with the ruling,
01:50so they can lose their seats as returning candidates on the basis of the violation of the ruling.
01:57Both judges raised questions even when the majority decision was not issued in the controversial ruling.
02:02In the controversial ruling, it is stated that after a brief decision, even after 15 days, the majority decision could not be issued.
02:09Due to the delay in the detailed decision, we are giving our findings only on a brief ruling.
02:14Like the Chief Justice, both judges are also concerned that the appeal of the second opinion is infructuous, i.e. can be unresolved.
02:21Although, it is a fact that the viewers' infructuous or unresolved is possible only when a decision becomes the cause of irreconcilable consequences before the hearing of the second opinion.
02:31For both judges, it is extraordinary to give a detailed comment on such a decision, according to the experts, which comes out of the timeline of the second opinion.
02:40A two-dimensional minority opinion stresses on a judiciary that it does not accept the decision of an eight-dimensional majority.
02:47In the controversial ruling, it is stated that it is also our firm opinion that no other judiciary cannot be asked to take such actions or decisions that are not lawful under the constitution.
02:57Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan and Justice Naeem Afghan rejected the request of the Sunni Jihad Council.
03:02And Justice Naeem Afghan also agreed with the decision of Justice Amin-ud-Din.
03:06According to the controversial ruling, the free candidates were admitted to the Election Commission, the National Assembly and the Provincial Assemblies after the procedure was completed.
03:13The 39 or 41 Arrakeen Assemblies, which have been referred to the majority decision, were never disputed.
03:21This objection was not raised in any court proceedings that Arrakeen did not take part in the Sunni Jihad Council.
03:27Neither was the Justice Committee of the Election Commission nor the High Court.
03:30Until the decision was issued in the Supreme Court, the Justice Committee was not there.
03:34In the controversial ruling, it is further stated that the most time spent in the eight hearings of the 13th Rukni Full Court was spent on the questions of the judges.
03:41During the hearings, some judges also asked the question that can Arrakeen be given a reserve seat?
03:46No lawyer agreed to give the exclusive seats to the PTI.
03:50In the controversial ruling, it is further stated that the lawyer of Kawal Shauzab, Salman Akram Raja also said in the arguments that the exclusive seats do not belong to the PTI.
03:58The surprising thing is that the two judges have ignored all the questions raised by the Election Commission in the last eight hearings related to the exclusive seats.
04:08The consensus of most of the judges, including the Chief Justice, is that the Election Commission has misinterpreted the court decision.
04:14In other words, the opinion of the two Rukni Akhiliyatis is that the majority of the eight Rukni decisions should not be accepted.
04:20Possibly, the controversial note of the two judges seems to support every step of the Election Commission, which was taken contrary to the court orders.
04:28According to the controversial ruling, the Supreme Court decided the fate of 80 Arrakeen without listening to them.
04:34Arrakeen's participation in the Sunni Ijtihad Council was not controversial at all.
04:38Arrakeen, who took part in the Sunni Ijtihad Council, was snatched from the Sunni Ijtihad Council without listening to him.
04:44When the Supreme Court hears an appeal, the power of hearing is limited, which was ignored in the majority of the decisions.
04:51The Noon League has also put this point in front of the court in the request for a review of the exclusive seats.
04:56On the part of the Noon League, it was said in the direct request that the Sunni Ijtihad Council and the PTI are separate political parties.
05:02The Sunni Ijtihad Council has already taken part in the Sunni Ijtihad Council.
05:05Arrakeen, who was declared a PTI, had declared himself free in the documents.
05:09It is against the law to declare Arrakeen free in 15 days.
05:13The senior leader of the Muslim League, Senator Irfan Siddiqui, said that if the two judges' controversial notes, the opinion of the Supreme Court experts,
05:21and the recent ruling of the Pakistan Bar Council are combined with the decision of the five Rukni benches of the Peshawar High Court,
05:27then the decision of the eight judges is a very controversial dispute due to the clear differences between the law and the law.
05:34The judges who give the decision, especially those who have to sit on the legitimate authority of the Chief Justice in the future,
05:41will have to think that whether they will continue to give explanations on the weight of this harsh decision on their shoulders all their lives,
05:48or in the light of the law, in the light of the law, in the light of the law, in the light of the law,
05:53who are the most likely to face redlight in the dark future.
05:56Viewers, the government is fully supporting the controversial notes of the two judges.
06:01The Wafaki Minister of Information and Communications, Tataullah Tadka, also has to say that the controversial judge's notes have left a great mark on the majority of the decisions and how to act on the decision.
06:11These two honourable judges have written a controversial note and issued a detailed decision.
06:16This has put a big question mark on the decision of the majority.
06:20They have raised very valid points.
06:22That in Article 175 and Article 185, the area of power that has been frozen,
06:28the majority has decided to go beyond that.
06:31They have talked about Article 51, Article 63 and Article 106 of the Constitution.
06:37They have said that the articles of the Constitution will have to be suspended in order to enforce this decision.
06:42How is this possible?
06:45The unfortunate election commission's hesitation, the government's request for a second look
06:49and the refusal to enforce the decision of the Supreme Court in the controversial note.
06:52Is it to deprive the movement of justice from its intended objectives?
06:55Or to block the way for the new Chief Justice of Pakistan to come in October 2024,
07:00as Mr. Hamid Khan was saying just now.