Bill seeking increase in number of SC Judges | Hassan Ayub Break Big News
#supremecourt #judges #pmlngovt #SCjudges #khawarghumman #hassanayub #chaudhryghulamhussain #haidernaqvi
Bill seeking increase in number of SC Judges | Hassan Ayub Break Big News
Bill seeking increase in number of SC Judges | Hassan Ayub Break Big News
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00What is the news?
00:02Should I give the news first?
00:04Please do a good job.
00:06The news is that
00:08the amendments have been vetted.
00:10So,
00:12today, tomorrow, day after tomorrow,
00:14in September.
00:16Who does the vetting?
00:18The Law Ministry does.
00:20It has been vetted.
00:22So, this is a government bill.
00:24Yes, it is a private member bill.
00:26But it has been vetted.
00:28The Law Ministry is not saying anything.
00:30I am warning you.
00:32Sir, I am supporting your news.
00:34It has been vetted.
00:36Who does the vetting?
00:38The Law Ministry does.
00:40You are a private member.
00:42You can hire a consultant.
00:44Vetting is a good thing.
00:46The Law Ministry is doing it.
00:48It will be supported by the government.
00:50It cannot be done without it.
00:52It should be done.
00:54There is a lot of pendency.
00:56The decision of the Supreme Court
00:58on the 12th of July,
01:00when you will give your
01:02likes and dislikes,
01:04then you should increase the number.
01:06If there is pendency,
01:08you should increase the number
01:10to end it.
01:12And the judges,
01:14who do not follow the law,
01:16you should bring them.
01:18Not only here,
01:20the number should increase in the High Court
01:22and in the District Courts.
01:242.5 million.
01:2625 lakh cases are pending.
01:28And the common petitioner is crying.
01:30I am very much
01:32impressed by
01:34your passion.
01:36You present
01:38the argument in a very good way.
01:40More than one judge.
01:42In Pakistan,
01:44they say that
01:46the Parliament is supreme.
01:48The Supreme Court is supreme.
01:50Where is the Supreme Court?
01:52In the Parliament,
01:54the Supreme Court is the same.
01:56It is in the constitution.
01:58Listen to me.
02:00According to you and
02:02the majority of the government,
02:04the 8 judges who
02:06made the decision on the 12th of July,
02:08are against the constitution.
02:10They are against the law.
02:12The people behind it,
02:14they have 209 articles.
02:16Why don't they use it?
02:18Don't you think it should be taken?
02:20What is the problem?
02:22You told us the problem.
02:24The problem is
02:26that the review has
02:28an option.
02:30The Supreme Court
02:32and the judges
02:34have an option
02:36to avail the remedy.
02:38If they don't,
02:40then the 209 option is there.
02:42It can be excised.
02:44And it can be
02:46used in a different way.
02:48No, it hasn't been used yet.
02:50Imagine,
02:52according to the
02:54Petition Procedure Law,
02:56only the Petition Procedure Committee
02:58will fix the cases.
03:00But it also says
03:02that the review has to be fixed
03:04within 15 days.
03:06But the judges will be on leave.
03:08They have summer vacations.
03:10So, don't apply for the review
03:12within 15 days.
03:14Don't follow the law.
03:16Our honorable judges
03:18will be on leave
03:20before the law.
03:32Let's go to Rana Sanawala.
03:34He is asking
03:36about
03:38the retirement age.
03:40There is a controversy
03:42about it.
03:44If the retirement age increases,
03:46then the Chief Justice
03:48will be able to continue.
03:50Otherwise, on 23rd or 24th October,
03:52his term will end.