#supremecourt #judges #pmlngovt #SCjudges #khawarghumman #hassanayub #chaudhryghulamhussain #haidernaqvi
Ye Jo Kar Rahe Hain iska Nuqsan Inhi ko Hona Hai | CH Ghulam Hussain's Analysis on judges bill
Bill seeking increase in number of SC Judges | Hassan Ayub Break Big News
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Ye Jo Kar Rahe Hain iska Nuqsan Inhi ko Hona Hai | CH Ghulam Hussain's Analysis on judges bill
Bill seeking increase in number of SC Judges | Hassan Ayub Break Big News
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Assalam-o-Alaikum, I am your host Khabar Ghumman.
00:15Today, we are going to talk about the electricity bill in Pakistan.
00:22As you know, yesterday there was a huge strike in the country.
00:25And for the past few weeks, we have been hearing from government officials that there is going to be a big decision on electricity prices.
00:33Mr. Hassan Ayyub has also told us.
00:35Government officials are also giving us this news.
00:39Now, will electricity be cheaper? We will talk about this in the program.
00:43Also, in Punjab, there is an agreement between Pakistan Muslim League Noon and Pakistan People's Party.
00:50No one has seen this unseen agreement.
00:52According to this agreement, Pakistan People's Party had to be adjusted.
00:56We are getting news from Takht-e-Lahore that when the agreement is put in front of Mariam Sahiba, she feels uncomfortable.
01:05It is a matter of giving some excuses.
01:07She is coming on the formula of power sharing.
01:10We will share the exclusive story with you in the second part of the program.
01:15But first of all, the big issue that is going on.
01:18We are sitting in Wafaaq, in Islamabad.
01:21There is only one issue under discussion in Islamabad.
01:24Will the current Chief Justice continue?
01:27After 23rd October, when he has to superannuate, when his term of office is going to be completed,
01:33is he getting an extension or not?
01:36And the government is going to increase the number of judges.
01:39Judges' retirement age has some intention of legislating.
01:44So these are all the issues.
01:46We will talk about this in the first part of the program, which is our top story.
01:51Today, a story has been published in Dawn newspaper.
01:55Let me show you that.
01:57And this is basically about the number of judges.
02:01This is an incident of 1997.
02:04At that time, you will remember, Mr. Nawaz Sharif had a heavy mandate.
02:09There was a two-third majority in the National Assembly.
02:12And some matters went bad with the Supreme Court at that time, with the Chief Justice.
02:18So it was decided that the number of judges should be reduced from 17 to 13.
02:23Legislation was prepared.
02:25Sorry, it should be reduced from 17 to 12.
02:27Legislation was prepared.
02:29And the president of the Bar of the Supreme Court at that time was Mr. Mohammad Akram Sheikh.
02:38He told Dawn last night that I went to the Supreme Court again.
02:42When the case was filed in front of the Supreme Court,
02:45the Attorney General at that time, you are late, may Allah forgive him,
02:51Mr. Chaudhry Mohammad Farooq was called.
02:55So by that time it was seen that the Supreme Court can take very strict action on it.
03:01So the AG went there and said that there was a plan, there was an intention, there was a thought.
03:08And we are taking back this legislation.
03:11This is the whole story.
03:13Now Mr. Daniel Chaudhry, a young, excited MNA from Rawalpindi,
03:17he kept the bill in the court as a private member.
03:23That day there was a problem with the quorum.
03:25Now there is information that it may be taken up tomorrow.
03:28And in that he is saying that he intends to increase the number of judges.
03:33And this is his personal thought.
03:35Listen to what he is saying.
03:37The bill is basically for some backlog in the Supreme Court.
03:41That yes, there have been more than 10-12 years in which the appeal has been in pending.
03:47To address that, the quantity of judges should be 20.
03:52And the issues of your people should be addressed.
03:57In your bill, Mr. Daniel, is there anything about the retirement of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?
04:04No, there is nothing in it.
04:06After that, Mr. Rana Sanawala also said in this regard.
04:11When he was asked that this bill is a government bill, the government is presenting restrictions.
04:17This is a private member bill. Listen.
04:19This bill is not from the government.
04:21And on a private member's day, any ...
04:24You know these small incidents always happen.
04:26Now the man is yours.
04:28That is our command.
04:30But the man does not do everything by asking.
04:33No, Mr. Daniel Jauzi, without asking, Mr. Rana, this kind of bill is related to the judges.
04:39He will prepare it himself.
04:41The judges may have this desire.
04:45Everyone says that Sadat ...
04:48This is not acceptable.
04:50Viewers are watching you.
04:52But you should agree.
04:54This bill has been presented on a private member's day.
04:58This has not been presented by the government.
05:00It did not happen.
05:01But ...
05:02It would not have happened without the will of the government.
05:04No, if the will of the government is there, it will go ahead.
05:09Otherwise, if the will of the government is not there, then today this has come in our notice.
05:13So this will be withdrawn.
05:15Mr. Chaudhary Gulamshahi, today I will come to you first because ...
05:19The incident of 1997.
05:21I was still in the university at that time.
05:23We saw that the Supreme Court ...
05:26A complaint was filed.
05:28In it, a few people were punished.
05:31In my opinion, Mr. Daniel Aziz's father, if I can ...
05:35Mr. Choudhary Gulamshahi, Mr. Shehbaz Ghoshi.
05:38One of our famous Nilam Ghar hosts.
05:41No, they were punished.
05:42Yes, they were punished.
05:43Nilam Ghar host Mr. Tariq Aziz.
05:45Who else was there?
05:47There were a few more people.
05:49Mr. Choudhary, now the number of judges should be increased.
05:53In the country, there is a consensus on cheap and foreign justice.
05:58All political parties write in their manifesto ...
06:04That we will take all these steps.
06:06So that there is no penance.
06:08There is a quick benefit of the case.
06:10But the real thing is the intention.
06:13I was reading the story of Mr. Akram Sheikh.
06:15In it, he also says that the matter is of the decision of July 12.
06:19There is a worry about it.
06:21Now the audience is talking about Mr. Akram Sheikh.
06:26He is a senior lawyer.
06:28Because he is local here.
06:30Hassan Ayyub knows that he is respected in his legal fraternity.
06:35So it is a matter of intention.
06:37If you put it in front of 1997.
06:40And today put it in front of 2024.
06:43At that time, Pakistan was Muslim League Noon.
06:45Even today, Pakistan is Muslim League Noon.
06:47And the good thing is that Mr. Talat did not hit us.
06:49He said that you are trying to get small incidents.
06:53I mean, there is something else behind it.
06:55Mr. Rana, you know, he is also a player.
06:58He also laughed and came.
06:59He said, no, no, he is an individual.
07:00He thought that it was good.
07:02No, he is not a lion of the law.
07:04No, no, he is not.
07:05He is Barrister Aqeel.
07:07He is another young MNA.
07:11He is also from Rabalpindi.
07:12Yes, Mr. Chaudhary.
07:15No, so what are they trying to do?
07:17Why are they making a mess?
07:20It means that something should be done gracefully.
07:25If the time of the Chief Justice is over, then they should go.
07:28So what if you do 25, what if you do 100?
07:32It means that there is a burden on the treasury.
07:35There is no difference.
07:37The conditions of the country.
07:39Don't do much in such a game.
07:41I always say that someone should come to the service of the people.
07:44You don't have that.
07:46Today, because of the electricity bill,
07:49a sad incident has happened there towards Multan.
07:52We will talk about it.
07:53Mr. Jai, we will come to it.
07:54You comment on this first.
07:56Yes Mr. Jai.
07:57No, I will only say that what they are doing is of no use.
08:01They will be harmed.
08:02What will happen to them?
08:04They are nothing.
08:09Okay, Mr. Nagveer.
08:12Now, when it comes to increasing the number of judges,
08:15you will talk to any Pakistani,
08:17you will talk to a lawyer,
08:18he will say that there should be an increase in the number of cases in Pakistan.
08:22There are all cases.
08:24I have spoken to some lawyers,
08:26they have some experience,
08:27they cover the Supreme Court.
08:28I will also ask Hassan.
08:29They say that in Pakistan,
08:32in legal terms,
08:34the Chief Justice is called the father of the court.
08:37The Supreme Court has to look at all the cases as a father.
08:45So, the Supreme Court,
08:47there is also a Judicial Commission,
08:49the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,
08:50the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,
08:51can send a request to the Attorney General
08:53that we have these cases,
08:55it is a penance.
08:56The way these dog judges were taken the other day,
08:58so the number of judges can also be increased.
09:00But it is a matter of intention.
09:03What news do you have?
09:04First the news,
09:05then you can comment.
09:06Because you have already received a comment.
09:08You hide the news and take it somewhere.
09:12Mr. Nagveer.
09:13Look, the news is written on the wall
09:15that the number of judges is increasing.
09:17What is a bigger news than this?
09:19The reason.
09:20The reason.
09:21It is a matter of morality.
09:23So, from this assembly floor,
09:25we saw that
09:27Osama Bin Laden was called a martyr.
09:30From this assembly floor,
09:31we saw that
09:32in favor of Israel,
09:34it was said that
09:35diplomatic relations should be established with Israel.
09:37Then from this assembly floor,
09:39we saw that
09:41the current Minister of Justice
09:44presents such a resolution
09:47which later proves to be false.
09:49And on the basis of that,
09:50the entire system,
09:51on the basis of the cipher,
09:52the entire system is thrown away.
09:55So, the fact is that
09:56it is a matter of morality.
09:57If this Daniyal Chaudhary
09:58is bringing any such resolution
09:59on a private member
10:00or on a governmental level,
10:02then we have to see
10:03that the people sitting in our assembly,
10:06where are they standing in morality?
10:08If they are standing at a high level in morality,
10:10then the people are behind them.
10:12But if they are not standing
10:13and any of your resolutions,
10:14any thought,
10:15any slogan,
10:16any position,
10:17means only that
10:18if you want to achieve personal interests,
10:21then the people will gradually reject you
10:23and then you will not be able to show your face to anyone.
10:26Yes.
10:27Okay Hassan,
10:28in this,
10:29Akram Sheikh Sahib is saying that
10:31the number of judges is not as much
10:34as you will have to improve the system,
10:36you will have to bring efficiency into it.
10:38So,
10:39what they will do now,
10:41it is all about the timing.
10:42And you know,
10:43in politics,
10:44it is said that
10:45timing matters.
10:46Absolutely,
10:47you are right.
10:48Right now,
10:49Mr. Talal is also asking him again and again,
10:51is it possible in your opinion
10:53that
10:54Barrister Daniyal Aziz
10:56came up with a brilliant wave in his mind at night
10:59and made a law on it,
11:01wrote on it,
11:02made a note of it
11:03and submitted it to the assembly?
11:05Is it a note of it?
11:06These are the amendments of one page,
11:08which are of 1997,
11:10which is the strength of judges in the Supreme Court,
11:1217 is being made 22,
11:15and if you include it,
11:17it will become 23.
11:20So, it is a one-pager,
11:21it is not a big thing.
11:22You said,
11:23what is the news?
11:24So, should I give the news first?
11:25Yes, please,
11:26do a good job.
11:27The news is that,
11:28Mr. Nagrish does not give us the news,
11:29he keeps the news to himself.
11:30These amendments,
11:31they have been vetted.
11:33So,
11:34today,
11:35tomorrow,
11:36day after tomorrow,
11:37in September,
11:38Who does the vetting?
11:39Yes,
11:40the Law Ministry does it.
11:41The government does it.
11:42Yes,
11:43it has been vetted.
11:44So, this is a government bill.
11:45Yes,
11:46it is a private member bill,
11:47but it has been vetted.
11:49My sources are telling me,
11:50the Law Ministry is not saying anything.
11:51You listen to the news,
11:52I am telling you.
11:53Sir,
11:54I am supporting your news.
11:55Yes,
11:56it has been vetted.
11:57When you say that the vetting has been done,
11:58Who does the vetting?
11:59You know the Law Ministry does it.
12:00I am saying the same.
12:01The vetting is done by a private member,
12:03who can hire a consultant.
12:05So,
12:06the vetting is a good thing.
12:07The Law Ministry is doing it,
12:08the government is doing it.
12:09So,
12:10it will be fully supported.
12:11It cannot happen without it.
12:12It cannot happen without it,
12:13but it should happen,
12:14because there is a lot of pendency.
12:15And the real thing is,
12:16let's not talk about the timing,
12:17it is about the timing.
12:18The timing is that,
12:19the decision of the Supreme Court on July 12th,
12:21when you will move away from the law,
12:23and when you will give your likes and dislikes on it,
12:26then,
12:27absolutely,
12:28you should increase the number.
12:30If there is pendency,
12:31you should increase the number to end it.
12:33And the judges,
12:34who you think are not following the law,
12:37then,
12:38you are not a judge.
12:39You should bring them.
12:40And not only here,
12:41the number should increase in the High Court,
12:43the number should increase in the District Courts.
12:45Do you know,
12:46how many are there in the pendency country?
12:472.5 million.
12:4825 lakh cases have been filed,
12:50and the arm petitioner is crying.
12:53I am fully aware of your enthusiasm and passion,
12:58and I admit,
12:59you present the argument in a very good way.
13:03One judge,
13:04more than one judge,
13:05In Pakistan,
13:06it is said that,
13:07Parliament is Supreme,
13:09Supreme Court is Supreme,
13:12Parliament is Supreme,
13:13Supreme Court is not Supreme.
13:14Ok, listen to me.
13:15In the Parliamentary System of the Republic,
13:17Supreme is one thing,
13:18the law.
13:19What is to be done in the law?
13:20Ok, listen to me.
13:21According to you,
13:22and according to the majority of the government,
13:24I mean,
13:25the majority of the government says,
13:26that the 8 judges,
13:28who made the decision on July 12th,
13:30of the pendency,
13:31are against the law,
13:32are against the law.
13:34So, the people behind this,
13:35what is the logic behind it?
13:37209, 80,
13:38why don't they use it?
13:39In the Supreme Court,
13:40the matter is,
13:41You don't think it should be taken there?
13:43Actually, what is the problem?
13:45No, you told me the problem.
13:46The problem is,
13:47what is the problem of not going that way?
13:50Right now,
13:51the option of review is there,
13:52who has the option of correcting their mistake,
13:55the Supreme Court,
13:56and these judges have an option,
13:58they should avail this remedy of theirs.
14:00If they don't do it,
14:02then the option of 209 is also there,
14:04it can be exercised,
14:06and it is possible that,
14:08it can be done in some other way.
14:09That has also been vetted,
14:10a reference has been vetted.
14:11No, that has not been vetted yet.
14:12That has not been vetted yet.
14:13Now, when it comes to the case of review,
14:14you can imagine,
14:15that,
14:16according to the Petition Procedure Law,
14:18three committees,
14:19the Petition Procedure Committee,
14:21will fix the cases.
14:23But they also say,
14:24that you have to fix the review within 15 days,
14:27but the judges will go on leave there.
14:29There are summer vacations there.
14:31It is fine,
14:32but do not fix the review within 15 days,
14:35do not follow the law,
14:37because we will have vacations.
14:39So, the vacations will be given in advance,
14:41by our honourable judges,
14:43that the vacations will be given in advance,
14:45in relation to the law.
14:47It is obvious,
14:48there should be a rule of law in the country.
14:50There is a law,
14:51there is a law on the law.
14:52The vacations are given in advance by the law.
14:54Viewers,
14:55now let us go to Mr. Rana Sonawala,
14:57when he was asked a question again,
14:59he is saying that,
15:01the issue of retirement age,
15:03because there is controversy on this issue,
15:06if the retirement age increases,
15:08then the current Chief Justice will be able to continue,
15:11otherwise on 23rd October or 24th October,
15:14his tenure will end.
15:16What is he saying?
15:17Listen.
15:18Two things have been discussed for a long time.
15:21The judges of the High Court,
15:22their age of retirement is 62 years.
15:25The judges of the Supreme Court,
15:27their age of retirement is 65 years.
15:30Now, for these three years,
15:32every time,
15:33there is a controversy everywhere.
15:35Every person wants to come here,
15:37for three years,
15:38to take more time.
15:40There is no harm in it,
15:42if the date of retirement,
15:44of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court,
15:46becomes one,
15:47both become 65 years.
15:49In this regard,
15:50the barge is also on board,
15:53and the judges have no objection.
15:56So, this is under consideration,
15:59that everyone,
16:00and let me tell you,
16:02or you can note,
16:03that if the age increases,
16:05it will not only increase for the judges,
16:07it will increase for everyone.
16:09If the age increases,
16:11then it will increase for everyone,
16:13it will increase for you as well.
16:14Mr. Khawar, if you permit me,
16:16you will have to ask a question,
16:18and if you don't want to answer it,
16:19then don't.
16:20So, because Mr. Khawar Govind,
16:23the judges of the Supreme Court,
16:258 or 11 or whatever,
16:27because according to them,
16:29or according to you,
16:31they have given a judgment,
16:33contrary to the law and the constitution,
16:35should they be dismissed,
16:37through a resolution,
16:38or should they resign themselves?
16:40Resolution would be enough for a National Assembly,
16:42in my opinion.
16:43But Mr. Musade Malik is saying,
16:44that we need a right judge.
16:46No, this is your...
16:47You are talking about me, right?
16:49Listen to me.
16:50He is addressing me.
16:51He is addressing you,
16:52but he is not addressing me.
16:53He is an old man, let him talk.
16:55He is laughing, he is smiling.
16:57We know...
16:58No, no, I will listen patiently.
17:00Mr. Chaudhary is elder to me,
17:01he is very respectable.
17:02Look, your influence and Mr. Nakvi's influence,
17:05we take that influence very seriously.
17:07Yes, yes.
17:08We get upset.
17:10So, please take care of our health.
17:12Let him talk about Mr. Chaudhary's health.
17:14He wants to talk, let him talk.
17:15I am saying the same.
17:16Please take care of us.
17:17Mr. Musade Malik is saying,
17:19listen to him.
17:21There are many countries,
17:23where there is a seniority principle.
17:25The principle is, the best judge.
17:27There must be a discussion,
17:29a school of thought must be saying,
17:30this should happen,
17:31a school of thought must be saying,
17:32this should not happen.
17:33Look, both.
17:34One says,
17:35like we say in civil service,
17:36everyone reaches to a certain level of incompetence.
17:41So, this should not happen.
17:43And when...
17:44In the world,
17:45you have never said,
17:46the oldest person should be made the CEO.
17:49So, when this is not the case anywhere in the world,
17:51and people do application of mind with seriousness,
17:54and the best person is given a chance,
17:58and age is put on success,
18:01that until you become an old man,
18:03we will not let you succeed.
18:05Sir, but it was interesting,
18:06what you said.
18:08Our Mr. Musade Malik,
18:10viewers,
18:11until he becomes an old man.
18:13Now, Mr. Musade Malik,
18:15you know,
18:16viewers,
18:17he has spent most of his life in America.
18:19He has studied in America.
18:20In America,
18:21he has studied in biochemistry.
18:25Sorry,
18:26if there is any mistake in my information in this regard.
18:28In America,
18:29viewers,
18:30when a judge is appointed,
18:32there are 9 judges there.
18:34So, that judge,
18:35until that brother-in-law does not die,
18:37does not die,
18:39until then,
18:40he remains on that position,
18:42or he becomes on the side of his own will.
18:45No one can point fingers at the judge.
18:48Mr. Nagni,
18:49you are a right judge.
18:50Once a judge is appointed at the level of Supreme Court,
18:53you can imagine,
18:55that you understand this argument.
18:57I mean,
18:58you do not have to be more influenced
19:01by the emotions of Hassan Ayub.
19:04I mean,
19:05I am talking a little differently.
19:07I mean,
19:08you understand this argument,
19:09that there is one person,
19:10who fulfills the criteria,
19:12he becomes a judge of the High Court,
19:14Chief Justice of the High Court,
19:15and then becomes a judge of the Supreme Court.
19:17So, still,
19:18our rulers across the board
19:20need a right judge,
19:22for the right place.
19:25Look,
19:26let's look at this in a different way.
19:27This is not possible.
19:28You should look at it in our way.
19:30Mr. Nagni,
19:31you should look at it in our way,
19:32in our position.
19:33What is your position,
19:34that I am talking about?
19:35You should come to our position,
19:37and talk a little.
19:39Maybe,
19:40it will be easier for you.
19:41No, no.
19:42I am talking about your position.
19:43That is why I said,
19:44let's look at it in a different way.
19:45Yes, yes.
19:46So, look,
19:47the thing is that,
19:48be it judges,
19:49they take advantage of the law,
19:52governments and institutions.
19:55Be it judges,
19:56be it officers sitting in other institutions,
19:58in any case,
19:59be it in bureaucracy,
20:01or in governments,
20:02anywhere.
20:03Or let's talk about private institutions.
20:05Let's talk about the media.
20:07Our misfortune is that,
20:08why are we not able to progress?
20:10We are not able to progress,
20:12because we don't let the right talent come forward.
20:15Let's just talk about the media.
20:17They have closed the door from inside.
20:19They don't let anyone in.
20:21People have been doing talk shows here for 25 years.
20:24There are 200 people behind them.
20:26Give them a chance.
20:27They have been sitting in the media positions for 25 years.
20:30There are poor talented people behind them.
20:32Give them a chance.
20:33For 25 years,
20:34Mr. Nagni,
20:35I have been here for 4 years.
20:36Mr. Nagni,
20:37I have just come into the profession for the last few years.
20:40I said for 25 years.
20:41I said,
20:42you don't understand yourself.
20:43I want to tell you this.
20:46The government is doing this to save itself.
20:50You have to camouflage.
20:52If you don't want to go on vacations,
20:55you say,
20:56let's listen to the reviews.
20:57We will go after a week.
20:58There was no debate.
20:59There was no fight.
21:00It would have been like milk and water.
21:03You yourself invited the government.
21:05You said,
21:06come and fight with us.
21:07The government stayed within the scope of the law
21:09and started fighting on the floor level.
21:12They started bringing resolutions.
21:15They started giving statements
21:17that came within the scope of the law
21:19and the parliament took advantage of it.
21:21We have to think
21:23that in all these scenarios,
21:26no matter which institution,
21:28are we allowing the right people to come first?
21:31Is the government supporting the right people?
21:34And thirdly,
21:35if there is any kind of conflict,
21:38protest or attack on anyone,
21:40did the government not invite them?
21:42This is the point.
21:43The argument that Mr. Chaudhary has made,
21:48a fully substantiated argument,
21:52that this is a wrong decision,
21:54a violation of the law,
21:55if we have to find a solution,
21:58how will we find a solution in the presence of judges?
22:01Where will the new judges come from?
22:04Only these judges can recall their decisions.
22:07And I think they will.
22:09Will Qazi Faiz Ishaq also take back his government?
22:11Yes, Qazi Faiz Ishaq's decision is about 8 judges.
22:14No, it is about 11 judges.
22:16Yes, Qazi Faiz Ishaq should take back his decision.
22:20I agree with his decision,
22:22and I do not agree with his remark
22:27that the Election Commission
22:29has misinterpreted the Supreme Court's decision.
22:32The Election Commission has made the right decision.
22:35I have read that decision several times.
22:37It was made on January 13.
22:39It was this implementation that the Election Commission made.
22:42Why did the judges write it?
22:44Why did they say it?
22:45It is difficult to understand.
22:46But as far as increasing the judges' strength is concerned,
22:51if the judges' strength increases,
22:53the judges of the Supreme Court's strength will also increase.
22:55And the Judicial Commission,
22:57which will elevate the judges of the Supreme Court,
23:01will also elevate the judges.
23:03Who did this before?
23:05The Judicial Commission.
23:07So, yes, I am talking about that.
23:09But I would like to say one thing.
23:11The election of judges in the High Court
23:13should be done by the District Judiciary.
23:17Judges who understand the trial.
23:19Excuse me.
23:20Excuse me.
23:22Our honourable judges are those
23:24who have never done a trial in their life.
23:27There is a lot of debate on this issue.
23:29There should be a method of induction.
23:32Just like people come to civil services.
23:34But after that, the career progression comes.
23:36It is not that the chamber has influence.
23:41Mr. Khawar, I have to say a sentence.
23:44Mr. Chaudhary, I am coming to you.
23:45Why just one sentence?
23:46Both of you are young.
23:47You eat up the whole program.
23:48I come to you out of fear.
23:50You do not speak further.
23:51Instead of one sentence,
23:53you say more sentences.
23:55I will say something else.
23:57Yes, Mr. Chaudhary.
23:58Mr. Khawar, your job as an anchorperson,
24:06talk shows and all these services,
24:11it is survival of the fittest.
24:14It is decided after an hour
24:18whether a person is fit or unfit.
24:21Is he successful or unsuccessful?
24:23In my opinion,
24:25forgive me if you like it or not,
24:28no one can stop anyone here.
24:31Why?
24:32If you do not know how to work,
24:33you are free the next day.
24:35Whether you are a lawyer, a lawyer,
24:37a journalist, etc.
24:40Viewers, I hope you...
24:43Mr. Chaudhary, which judge are you pointing to?
24:45No, no, no.
24:46Mr. Naqvi, I am not pointing to you.
24:49I am not pointing to any judge.
24:51Are we going to die by pointing?
24:53He spoke in general.
24:54It was not specific.
24:56Viewers, let's take a short break.
24:57We will talk after the break.
24:58In the country,
24:59regarding the prices of electricity,
25:01the government,
25:02along with Hassan Ayub,
25:03has also given us good news.
25:05Mr. Naqvi also told us
25:06that something or the other
25:07will happen by the end of this month.
25:09Whether it is going to happen or not,
25:11what are the issues,
25:12we will talk after a short break.
25:16Welcome back, viewers.
25:18Expensive electricity
25:19is the biggest issue
25:20of the country and the people of Pakistan.
25:23It is a big challenge for the government.
25:27Respected Prime Minister Shabaz Sharif
25:29told us in Khushabri
25:31that we will find a solution soon.
25:35I want to tell you today
25:38that the entire government of Pakistan
25:40is working day and night
25:43with determination and determination.
25:46Inshallah, in the next few days,
25:48you will get good news
25:50regarding electricity in the whole of Pakistan,
25:52regarding the prices of electricity,
25:54and regarding the shortage of electricity,
25:56Inshallah.
25:57Viewers,
25:58on 14th August,
25:59the day of independence,
26:00he told us that we will get freedom
26:02from the price of electricity.
26:04Mr. Abbas Laghari,
26:05who is the Minister of Electricity,
26:07had also announced
26:09that in the future,
26:11he will solve the issue of electricity.
26:16Inshallah, in the next one to two months,
26:19Mr. Shabaz Sharif's government
26:21will give such good news
26:23regarding electricity
26:25that the government of Pakistan,
26:27the people of Pakistan,
26:28and all the business classes
26:30will be in a win-win situation.
26:33And after a few days,
26:36this month-long journey,
26:38Mr. Laghari has postponed it for a year.
26:41It may take a year
26:43for good news to come.
26:45As your interest rate is decreasing,
26:48as the price of your money
26:50is stabilizing,
26:52there will be a difference
26:54in the capacity payments,
26:56which you will see in a year
26:58that the prices of electricity
27:00will be very low.
27:02One year,
27:03and along with this,
27:05when they were asked
27:07to review the agreements
27:09with the IPPs,
27:11Mr. Laghari said that
27:13this is not possible.
27:15These IPPs have mostly
27:17taken back a large part
27:19of their investment.
27:21Are you thinking of
27:23a renegotiation with them?
27:25We are looking at it from every angle,
27:27but with all the IPPs,
27:29whether they are local
27:31or foreign,
27:33we have 1.25 lakh IPPs
27:35and all of them are IPPs.
27:37You know who they are,
27:39don't you?
27:41The solar net metering company.
27:43We respect their 7-year contract
27:45from the bottom of our hearts.
27:47We will not forcefully
27:49terminate the contract
27:51with them.
27:53But we can talk to them,
27:55right?
27:57We can bring them
27:59on mutually understandable
28:01and mutually agreeable terms
28:03and their compulsion
28:05can be explained to them.
28:07The compulsion, viewers,
28:09is that a news has been published
28:11in The Nation newspaper
28:13this July that there are
28:1540 Pakistani families
28:17and viewers all across
28:19all the political parties,
28:21the big ones,
28:23their relatives,
28:25children,
28:27sons, all are included.
28:29Along with this,
28:31from 1990 till now,
28:33these IPPs have taken
28:35advantage of a tax cut
28:37of 12 crore rupees.
28:3912 crore means 12,000
28:41Arabs.
28:43And viewers,
28:45you know how many crores are there
28:47in one Arab.
28:49And in one crore,
28:51there are 100 lakhs.
28:53You can understand this figure
28:55better.
28:57Mr. Naqvi,
28:59today is 29th of August.
29:01Two days are left.
29:03You told us the news.
29:05First of all,
29:07we raised our voice
29:09against the IPP.
29:11And after that,
29:13it became a big debate.
29:15Your point is absolutely right.
29:17These IPPs are running
29:1940 families in Pakistan
29:21who have been looting them
29:23for years.
29:25And their defenders,
29:27either you come
29:29and sit on the television screen
29:31and give logic that
29:33why is it necessary to give money
29:35to the IPPs for additional
29:37electricity production.
29:39Prove it in front of the Pakistani people.
29:41But if you can't prove it
29:43and you just come and say
29:45that our reputation will be ruined
29:47if we don't follow these agreements,
29:49then this is not an argument.
29:51Pakistani people are not going to
29:53come in any argument or lollipop.
29:55We will have to take immediate action.
29:57And about solar,
29:59this is a big achievement
30:01of the Sindh government.
30:03Let me tell you,
30:05this is a revolutionary program
30:07like the Benazir Income Support Program.
30:09The whole world is going to solar.
30:11I am sitting in Germany right now.
30:13I can show you from the window
30:15that there are big solar panels at home.
30:17The whole world is going to solar.
30:19If the Sindh government
30:21is successful in spreading solar
30:23and it should continue
30:25and it should be on.
30:27This is a very good initiative.
30:29Today, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari
30:31was talking in Karachi.
30:33He was distributing solar panels
30:35which is a good initiative of the Sindh government.
30:37Mr. Chaudhary, this is a good initiative
30:39taken by the Sindh government
30:41regarding electricity bills.
30:43Today, you saw a very sad news
30:45on social media.
30:47I don't know, the Babda people went.
30:49They were removing the meter.
30:51The fights are increasing.
30:53Will the government have to take
30:55any action regarding this?
30:57No.
30:59Yesterday, when Mr. Baloch
31:01came,
31:03he had a meeting yesterday.
31:05He said that
31:07we are using 22,000
31:09and we are charging 48,000.
31:11That is, a payment of
31:1348,000 MW is being made
31:15and Pakistan is using
31:1722,000.
31:19What will we do with this?
31:21This is not a robbery.
31:23This has never happened
31:25in the world.
31:27Have you ever thought
31:29that you can buy
31:31a kheer and pay
31:33for 2 kgs?
31:35What is this?
31:37Hassan, we have to go to the next break.
31:39Quickly tell us
31:41what do you think is the solution?
31:43We are working on the solution.
31:45It is a long term plan.
31:47When will it come?
31:49ISI is doing
31:51negotiations.
31:53They are also on board.
31:55The Prime Minister is on board.
31:57The Army Chief is on board.
31:59Mr. Abbas Laghari
32:01is also on board.
32:03The Finance Ministry is also on board.
32:05How is Abbas Laghari doing?
32:07He has given a year's time.
32:09I don't agree with him.
32:11It will happen very soon.
32:13In that function,
32:15ISPR
32:17did not answer
32:19the questions
32:21asked by the Army Chief.
32:23He did not participate
32:25in the Ulma Conference.
32:27I will not talk about it.
32:29They have also talked about it.
32:31It is a very serious matter.
32:33Let's hope for the good.
32:35This is a matter of the whole of Pakistan.
32:37We will go to the next break.
32:39After the break, we will tell you
32:41what is going on
32:43Welcome back.
32:45Viewers,
32:47you have been watching
32:49and reading the news for the past few days.
32:51Coordination committees have been formed
32:53in Punjab for the People's Party and Noon League.
32:55There was an agreement
32:57when the government was formed
32:59in Wafaaq.
33:01In the coming days,
33:03the People's Party will get a share in Punjab.
33:05But the People's Party is
33:07struggling.
33:09Their posting is not being transferred.
33:11Chandra Sahib said
33:13that if this is the case,
33:15then we will be ready
33:17to do something else.
33:19Otherwise, we will not complain.
33:21Pakistan Muslim League Noon.
33:23Jahangir Khan is with us.
33:25Our representative
33:27has broken this story.
33:29Thank you very much.
33:31The fundamental point
33:33that I understood
33:35in the news you were giving
33:37is that Marjum Sahiba is unhappy.
33:39She is not happy that
33:41these people are sitting in her cabinet.
33:43What is the reason?
33:45If there is an agreement,
33:47then it has to be fulfilled.
33:49Thank you very much.
33:51In the meeting on 25th August,
33:53the People's Party
33:55has made the same claim
33:57that the demands you have accepted
33:59are not being fulfilled.
34:01None of the promises
34:03made to the People's Party
34:05were fulfilled.
34:07The main obstacle
34:09is the Punjab government,
34:11i.e. Mariam Nawaz Sahiba,
34:13the Prime Minister of Punjab.
34:15The demands of the People's Party
34:17are being fulfilled
34:19by her on behalf of Punjab.
34:21Other demands of the People's Party
34:23are being fulfilled by the government
34:25but when it comes to Punjab,
34:27even the loyal government
34:29raises its hand.
34:31These are the claims
34:33of the People's Party
34:35On 25th August,
34:37the meeting of the Coordination Committee
34:39was held in Lahore.
34:41A person who was present
34:43told us to leave the meeting
34:45but the visit given by the Punjab government
34:47was very formal.
34:49He started laughing
34:51and told us that
34:53there was no progress
34:55in this meeting.
34:57The administration of Punjab
34:59is not allowing us to leave.
35:01The PM of Punjab
35:03is not responding
35:05to all the issues.
35:07The Punjab government
35:09is not responding
35:11to all the issues.
35:13The loyal government
35:15is helpless.
35:17The Punjab government
35:19has been instructed
35:21not to trust the agreement
35:23with the People's Party.
35:25Their MPAs should be accommodated.
35:27Their female MPAs should be funded.
35:29The MPAs of the People's Party
35:31should be funded equally.
35:33The MPAs of the People's Party
35:35should be funded equally.
35:51The People's Party
35:53will not get anything
35:55in this agreement.
35:57If the People's Party
35:59doesn't support this agreement,
36:01it won't get anything.
36:03The People's Party
36:05can't leave this agreement
36:07at any cost.
36:29The PM of Punjab
36:31is not responding
36:33to all the issues.
36:35The PM of Punjab
36:37is not responding
36:39to all the issues.
36:41The PM of Punjab
36:43is not responding
36:45to all the issues.
36:47The PM of Punjab
36:49is not responding
36:51to all the issues.
36:53The PM of Punjab
36:55is not responding
36:57to all the issues.
36:59The PM of Punjab
37:01is not responding
37:03to all the issues.
37:05The PM of Punjab
37:07is not responding
37:09to all the issues.
37:11The PM of Punjab
37:13is not responding
37:15to all the issues.
37:17The PM of Punjab
37:19is not responding
37:21to all the issues.
37:23The PM of Punjab
37:25is not responding
37:27to all the issues.
37:29The PM of Punjab
37:31is not responding
37:33to all the issues.
37:35The PM of Punjab
37:37is not responding
37:39to all the issues.
37:41The PM of Punjab
37:43is not responding
37:45to all the issues.
37:47The PM of Punjab
37:49is not responding
37:51to all the issues.
37:53The PM of Punjab
37:55is not responding
37:57to all the issues.
37:59The PM of Punjab
38:01is not responding
38:03to all the issues.
38:05The PM of Punjab
38:07is not responding
38:09to all the issues.