"PTI Na Tu ECP Mein Fareeq Thi, Na SC Mein...", Azam Nazeer Tarar's Big Statement

ARY NEWS

#AzamNazeerTarar #ElectionCommission #SupremeCourt #PTI  Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY  Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP  ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.  Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia  Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial  Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv  Website: https://arynews.tv  Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv    Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio  Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial #ARYNews  ARY News Official YouTube Channel. For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Transcript

00:00such a situation has been created that the party which was not a party,

00:06the party which as a party did not go to the election commission to ask for it,

00:11in these proceedings I will talk continuously,

00:13neither that party became a party in front of Peshawar High Court,

00:17nor that party became a party in front of Supreme Court of Pakistan,

00:21in Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf,

00:23and the request was of Kawal Shozab Sahiba,

00:26that since I have been nominated as a candidate by the Sunni Jihad Council,

00:31so these seats should be given to us,

00:33and even today it is a clear position that the respondents did not get the notices,

00:39the independent proceedings did not take place,

00:42the other requests of becoming a party did not come,

00:45the MNAs about which this decision was made,

00:47they did not get an opinion by calling them,

00:49so all these questions are as they are,

00:54so the most important thing I understand,

00:58which I should do as a lawyer,

01:01I have also faced this problem,

01:03in the last two paragraphs,

01:05the two respected judges,

01:07who gave dissenting opinions,

01:09wrote controversial notes,

01:11about them also something was written very strictly,

01:15in the court all the judges were taught that everyone is equal,

01:20and seniority does not dominate the decisions,

01:24it cannot be said that the senior judges are doing this,

01:28so the junior judges have to follow,

01:30this is not a chain of command,

01:32this is not a force, this is a court,

01:34and I think the difference is the beauty of debate, logic,

01:40whenever we look at something in depth,

01:45then different opinions come,

01:47and out of those different opinions,

01:49something or the other comes out better,

01:51in the past also,

01:53very strict,

01:55controversial notes have come forward,

01:57in the near past,

01:58our same respected judges,

02:00wrote very daring and courageous,

02:02controversial notes,

02:04and their discussion also remained,

02:06on television screens,

02:08in the newspapers,

02:09in the debates of the bar rooms,

02:11about the Chief Justices of the time,

02:13opinions were given about the Supreme Court,

02:17there were judgments of the Supreme Court,

02:19about the court,

02:21it was written about the benches,

02:23within the judgments,

02:25how the deal was done,

02:26this was also written,

02:28so I think we should not go into this debate,

02:31but as a student of law,

02:33being a part of this system,

02:35I am certainly sorry about this,

02:37that something more strict,

02:39has been written in this,

02:41but because of this,

02:43the controversial notes,

02:45or their opinions,

02:47are neither diluted,

02:49nor will they go out of that decision,

02:51to sum up,

02:53I would say,

02:55that despite the detailed decision,

02:57the question at this time,

03:01on the legal plane,

03:03and it is a matter of law,

03:05is that,

03:07the list at this time,

03:09the matter has to be decided,

03:11according to the national law,

03:13and the 104A,

03:17and section 66,

03:19are a part of the law today,

03:21they are valid laws,

03:23in their presence,

03:25how these seats will be allocated,

03:29is there a way,

03:31that the law is overruled,

03:33these are the questions,

03:35whose answer,

03:37is not in the detailed decision,

04:07the video is not clear,

04:11the implementation of this decision,

04:13and the review of the matter,

04:15till when will the picture be clear,

04:17and clear,

04:19you have made my attention,

04:21you are right,

04:23the way I was talking about,

04:25respected judge,

Category

Transcript

Recommended