• 9 hours ago
El juicio contra Elián Valenzuela, conocido como L-Gante, avanza con la fase de alegatos. La fiscalía ha solicitado una condena de siete años de prisión efectiva por delitos de amenazas y privación ilegítima de la libertad. Los cargos incluyen un supuesto secuestro y amenazas a un vecino y a una mujer. La defensa busca reducir la pena, mientras que la querella pide entre tres y ocho años por diferentes hechos.

#DDM

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00How close is Elegante from jail? It is the turn of the allegations. The trial is being carried out against Elegante for crimes of threats and illegal deprivation of freedom. And well, apparently they have asked for seven years.
00:28Well, there were several requests today, all against Elegante, except for his defense, of course. The most serious is that of the prosecution, or one of the most serious is that of the prosecution, which asked for seven years of effective imprisonment, of course.
00:41That is to say, that if what the prosecution asks for is fulfilled, Elian Valenzuela would go to jail immediately for three facts. I told you, Mariana, the other time, that not a single fact is judged. The most known, the most serious of all, the most serious, is that of the alleged kidnapping, of the alleged illegitimate deprivation of freedom.
00:59But they also accuse him of having threatened a neighbor who accused him of having stolen from him, and also of having threatened a woman with whom he had a traffic accident. They locked themselves up.
01:10And the weapons, right? The possession of weapons.
01:12That there were weapons in all three.
01:13Of course.
01:14The prosecutor, the prosecution, asked for seven years for the three facts.
01:18A gift.
01:19For the crimes.
01:20But they still asked for 12.
01:21A gift.
01:22Well, because it could be.
01:23Ah.
01:24It could be.
01:25But the prosecutor asked for seven years.
01:26Because it is a gift.
01:27Ah.
01:28But the prosecutor asked for seven years.
01:29Because the illegal deprivation of freedom is a gift.
01:30Yes, it's a gift.
01:31But you have to be in jail for a day more.
01:32But it's fine, but it's little.
01:33It could be more.
01:34It could be more.
01:35The illegitimate deprivation is much more.
01:36You must have a maximum of 12.
01:37Now, why does the jury ask for less?
01:38How many do they have?
01:39Co-active threat?
01:40The jury asks, I understand, Martin, three years of effective imprisonment.
01:44No, because there are different jurors.
01:45No, because there are three different facts.
01:46Of course.
01:47There are three different facts.
01:48The lawyers of two facts of the illegitimate deprivation of freedom and one of the threats ask for eight years for these two facts.
01:56Then there is a second jury that asks for three years, as Lu said, but only because of the threats to the woman who locked her up and theoretically got out and threatened her.
02:06Co-active threats.
02:07Co-active threats.
02:08So, the most serious thing is ...
02:10Another gift.
02:11That, for the jury to ask for that, there was an economic agreement.
02:15Ah, yes?
02:16Ah, well, this is what the jury says.
02:17Because how much should he have asked?
02:18There may be an economic agreement.
02:19There may be, yes.
02:20There may be?
02:21There may be.
02:22Yes.
02:23Like a prosecutor, Mariana, asks for seven years, it's a lot.
02:24It's a lot.
02:25It's nothing.
02:26And seven, listen to me, Mauricio, it's okay, I know what you're saying.
02:27Five, you get four.
02:28You get four.
02:29Illegal deprivation of freedom can have ...
02:30Three months, how long has it been?
02:31It's okay, but it's five years in prison.
02:32You're saved, you're in freedom.
02:33You have to be five years in prison.
02:34But how, if you ask for seven, you get four in the sentence.
02:35You're going to be four.
02:36Mariana, you want to ask for seven ...
02:37And you get four, stop, let's do the math.
02:38You say they ask for seven, they give him four.
02:39If you ask for seven, they give you four.
02:40And well, he goes to prison two.
02:41He has a great lawyer, who is Escapolane.
02:42But if they give him four, how long is he in prison if they give him four?
02:58How effective is it?
02:59Two and a half years.
03:00Two, that's why.
03:01Yesterday, two years in prison, terrible.
03:02He was already in prison for three months.
03:03How long did he serve?
03:04Three months.
03:05Three months.
03:06Three months.
03:07Well, he's missing, he's missing.
03:08A year and a half.
03:10I'm getting upset.
03:11Usually, the courts turn to the prosecution for the sentences.
03:12I understand.
03:13Now, did he favor or harm Eliana Berido?
03:14I think ...
03:15It was true that the courts followed the prosecution.
03:16Kirchner would have four hundred ...
03:17Christina Kirchner, I would be 400 years in prison.
03:18But if practically ...
03:19No.
03:20What he did ...
03:21What he asked.
03:22But talking about corruption.
03:23How much did Luciani ask for?
03:25We're talking about corruption for your mother.
03:27We're not talking about a cause ...
03:33There is the police, I mean ...
03:37There is a cause of freedom, there is another thing.
03:40But to get out of this whirlwind,
03:42because I was going to ask,
03:46if what favored him or not has come from Susana,
03:48because I was surprised that he went to give an interview
03:50in such a popular program, hours before the trial.
03:54Yes, it is not the most common thing, it is not what usually happens,
03:57but obviously it was part of the strategy.
03:59The truth is that just seconds ago,
04:01Elian Valenzuela was asked,
04:03the judge asked him,
04:05do you want to say your last words?
04:07And Elegante said, yes, I do.
04:09He went to Estrado and said,
04:12I'm here because these gentlemen,
04:14he referred to the lawyers,
04:16asked me for money and I didn't give it to them.
04:19I really want to study law because I'm going to do better than them.
04:22He said, looking at the lawyers,
04:24this is your strategy, but it is part, of course,
04:26of Elegante's imprint.
04:28It is unpleasant for me to be sitting in front of them.
04:31All they want is my money
04:33and I will never give it to them.
04:35I earn the money by working,
04:37and it is for my family and for my daughter,
04:39excepting the prosecutor, who I think is an honorable person.
04:42I will never give them my money.
04:44He stood up, looked at them and said,
04:46I will never give them my money.
04:48Great, great.
04:50I don't know if he is guilty, if he is not guilty.
04:53If he is guilty, he has to be sentenced.
04:55He has to give his money.
04:57Well, it depends, doctor.
04:59Because this is settled with money.
05:01But it would have been settled before with money.
05:03Of course.
05:05But the truth, Mauricio,
05:07if this case were not for the protagonist Elegante,
05:09it would have been settled with money.
05:11And it was X, the one who is there.
05:13He would have been arrested first.
05:15He would have been arrested three months, X.
05:17It depends if he has money or not.
05:19But you have to prove it.
05:21They don't even approve it.
05:23The videos are there.
05:25The videos are there, they all go up by their own will and close the door.
05:27And what does that have?
05:29Come to my house.
05:31I don't think I'm defending him.
05:33What I see there, I don't see people being kidnapped.
05:35I see people going up by their own will.
05:37It is true what you say, Mauricio,
05:39that a situation can turn into a kidnapping.
05:41And they say they are not that innocent,
05:43because they are brown.
05:45That's why.
05:47Because they are brown.
05:49Since they are brown, they are not that innocent.
05:51He is trying to be politically correct,
05:53on purpose,
05:55for the presence of Pachon and for my presence.
05:57For the presence of Pachon and for my presence.
05:59To save the lawyers.
06:01Two facts.
06:03A right fact and a left fact.
06:05Are you listening?
06:07No, no, Maribel.
06:09Go with everything, Anibal, go with everything.
06:11It's all allowed here.
06:13The right one.
06:15The left one.
06:17The right fact.
06:19You are wise, Anibal.
06:21You see how they don't get hooked.
06:23Now, what the prosecutor says,
06:25help me if I'm wrong,
06:27is that what he did was to try,
06:29I mean elegantly, of course,
06:31to try to solve the issues
06:33with a kind of self-justice,
06:35outside the law.
06:37The so-called self-justice.
06:39That's the prosecutor's argument.
06:41Unfortunately,
06:43he is used to
06:45the neighborhood where he was born,
06:47where he grew up.
06:49And there he says something interesting.
06:51Because remember that inside that car
06:53there were four people.
06:55One was elegant,
06:57the other was the friend of Elegante,
06:59a.k.a. Muelita,
07:01and the other two people,
07:03who at first had denounced Elegante
07:05because they had deprived them of their freedom.
07:07Of those two people, one got off,
07:09who is a woman called Rosa,
07:11who said, no, no, in the end I regretted it,
07:13it was not an illegitimate deprivation of freedom.
07:15And the other was this Mr. Muelita,
07:17who was arrested at the trial,
07:19well, today they just released him.
07:21This man is not really guilty
07:23of depriving this other person
07:25of their freedom.
07:27But he was arrested for that?
07:29Among other things, he had precedents,
07:31but also for this.
07:33But what I wanted to explain now is
07:35that this man, Muelita,
07:37was also kidnapped by Valenzuela.
07:39It was the same situation as the one before.
07:41But this is an accommodation of lawyers.
07:43Well, now we start with the lawyers.
07:45Now comes the stage of the lawyers.
07:47Let's remember that I am a right-wing fascist.
07:49Two fascists.
07:51We are going on a tour with Aníbal Estévez,
07:53a right-wing fascist and a left-wing fascist.
07:55We are going to buy all the towns.
07:57The fascist TAP.
07:59We are going to fill ourselves with money.
08:01Instead of the button TAP, the fascist TAP.
08:03When is the verdict?
08:05October 28, at first.
08:07You can check the date, but on October 28,
08:09in 10 days, you will know if Elegante is going to jail or not.
08:11We'll see.

Recommended