• 2 days ago

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en
Transcript
00:00Russia's lawmakers have now approved a nearly 30% increase in defense spending,
00:05reinforcing the country's military budget amidst the ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
00:09The Kremlin plans to allocate a record $134 billion to national defense,
00:14more than 6% of Russia's GDP in a surge in military expenditure not seen since the Soviet era.
00:20Despite this, officials stress the budget social projects while downplaying the military outlays.
00:27The decision now awaits final approval from the upper house of the Duma
00:31before Vladimir Putin signs it officially into law.
00:36On all of these latest developments regarding the missile, Russia's defense spending,
00:41we are joined now by Dr. Alexander Titov from the University of Belfast,
00:46where he is a lecturer in modern European history.
00:49Thank you so much for joining us, Professor.
00:51These different claims of the missiles being used,
00:55we heard there from our correspondent, Emmanuel Shaz, about why it could have different
01:01implications, whether it was intercontinental or whether it was medium range.
01:05At this critical juncture in the war, why does it matter?
01:10Well, I don't think it matters, and I think we know what it is.
01:13And Americans knew, Russians taught Americans in advance about what they're going to use,
01:18because there is still some safety mechanism in terms of early warning.
01:23So allegedly, they told them half an hour before the actual launch.
01:27And the type of the missile launch, it's a new, not yet deployed missile, a medium range missile,
01:35which can carry both nuclear or conventional warheads.
01:40It's been fight, obviously, with conventional warheads.
01:44Why it's important is because this is the kind of clear, intentional escalation,
01:52but symbolic escalation from Russia in response to previous escalation by the United States
01:59and Britain, possibly France as well, by removing their veto on using their own
02:10supplied missiles against Russia's internationally recognized territory,
02:14which has never been done before.
02:15So we are on an escalationary path in the dying days of the Biden administration.
02:22Now, the Russians themselves say that they alerted the United States ahead of firing this missile.
02:32What do we understand from that in terms of the communication between the two big powers?
02:36Because if the United States has been warned,
02:40it means obviously there is some kind of dialogue taking place.
02:43Well, you know, with the, under the terms of the START treaty, which has been suspended,
02:51but the parties still adhere to some of its principles.
02:56And it's just a matter of basic nuclear safety.
02:59If there is a potential strike, Russia, United States are obliged to inform the other party
03:08of potential strike that is not aimed against it.
03:11So it's just a precautionary measure that the other party doesn't see it as a preemptive
03:20nuclear launch.
03:21So they're just following the bare minimum of what they still have in agreement in terms of
03:26use of nuclear capable missiles, which have, this missile in particular has a wider range
03:35than previously used ones, which is around 5,000 kilometres range,
03:43which would not be enough to reach the United States,
03:45but would be enough to reach the whole of Western Europe.
03:47It would be enough to reach another NATO country in the United Kingdom
03:51with those storm shadow missiles.
03:53Vladimir Putin, then in his statement, we heard him warn NATO countries who are giving
04:00Ukraine missiles to strike into Russia, that they would now be effectively Russian targets.
04:09Is this something that we should take on face value or is this just empty rhetoric?
04:14Well, it's up to you how you want to decide.
04:16If you want to take a risk and say it's empty rhetoric and just continue to escalate
04:24against Russia, that's the call of Macron,
04:29Stammer or Biden.
04:31You might take it that it's maybe not worth risking further escalation with Russia,
04:36which obviously has a very large nuclear arsenal and is,
04:44keep saying that it would use it if pushed against the wall.
04:51So it's a matter of not me or anyone else saying yes or no.
04:56It's just a matter of taking your own calculation risk and see whether it's worth it or not.
05:02And Biden, who is living in less than two months,
05:06obviously doesn't think that it's something he should be worried about.
05:10Is this a scorched earth policy from the US president, in your opinion?
05:15Well, I mean, I don't think there is a scorched earth policy, but certainly he is
05:22in the dying weeks of his presidency, allowing to go to cross the lines,
05:28which he was previously unwilling to cross, particularly with missile strikes.
05:33Also, landmines being sent to Ukraine from the United States,
05:36which were previously not being supplied,
05:39rushing through as much military aid to Ukraine as possible.
05:43So basically, it's not going to change anything on the ground so much,
05:48but it is kind of creating this high point of tension between the West and Russia,
05:54with Ukraine really being the punchback in all this.
05:59Because whatever Americans or British or French send to Ukraine against Russia,
06:04Russia can always, as this missile strike shows,
06:08can always retaliate multi-fold against Ukraine.
06:12And Ukraine will be suffering in any escalation more than anybody else.
06:18Ukraine very much caught in the middle there.
06:20Dr Alexander Titov, thank you so much for your insights on the latest missile strike in Dnipro.

Recommended