👉 El equipo de búsqueda termina los rastrillajes en la zona de 9 de Julio, utilizando canes especializados para detectar restos humanos. A pesar del esfuerzo, no se han obtenido resultados positivos hasta el momento. La jueza a cargo del caso ha expresado dudas sobre la productividad de estos métodos, pero se han llevado a cabo a petición de la familia del desaparecido.
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00We are already connected with Marcelo Hanson. We know that this is the second day of tracking.
00:04So far, it has been negative. I was listening to José Maseya, Roberto Méndez and Cecilia Conesa earlier.
00:09They will also be on the phone from July 9th. These are the images.
00:14Today early, another of the lagoons tracked. Remember, it is not that the...
00:19There it is, look, the K9. Those, I understand, are the canes that detect human remains.
00:27They get on the boats, cross the lagoon, and in the event of any alert of the canes,
00:35at that moment, divers should come down. What do the canes smell?
00:39And some gases produced by the decomposition of a body.
00:44But after six months, seven months?
00:46Of course. Well, that's why the judge, obviously, I understand that in his private office and all his staff,
00:51does not see that this is very productive, but he has asked the court, which represents the family,
00:57and it was done. Today I was listening to Roberto Méndez and the expert José Maseya and Roberto Méndez,
01:03family lawyer. Nothing. They went to look for what they actually found.
01:10Water. Water.
01:11And yes, there is water. There is water.
01:12There is the image. There was water.
01:14The dogs were tested.
01:15There was water and smoke.
01:17Ah, yes. And smoke.
01:18Smoke. Yes, a lot of smoke.
01:22Well, there I understand another tracking planned for tomorrow, in three days, but low cavities, right?
01:29And in parallel, the same as always, right? We don't get tired, do we?
01:33They keep giving us letters, even though tomorrow is over, because apparently again they ask to go against Mónica Chiribín.
01:42Again?
01:43Again they ask to go against...
01:45But why?
01:46Sacker can't believe it, we can't believe it, imagine someone who understands the law.
01:50It really is illogical.
01:52It is out of any legal reasoning to try to sue again a person, forget that she is a lawyer,
01:59again a person who has already been denied five detention opportunities,
02:03she is not even sued in the process of processing, I mean, what did you do?
02:09The prosecutors...
02:10The prosecutors sue her?
02:12No, no, the prosecutor's office asks for the indictment to be cited in the indictment,
02:16and the prosecutors told her the same thing again.
02:20The judge already said that it is not a precedent, that what they are asking for makes no sense,
02:26so the feeling I have is that, guys, renew the formula.
02:30You have to tell them that in addition...
02:32Because they continue with the tracking, they continue with the Chiribín request.
02:35You have to tell the prosecutor's office, who is asking for these things,
02:38that it would also have to be a different cause, it will not be able to be in the same cause.
02:42What this cause is looking for is precisely the disappearance of Lohan, what happened to Lohan,
02:48not the atypical conducts that the parties of the cause have carried out in this cause.
02:53Well, tomorrow we are going to go, right?
02:55Tomorrow we are going to go.
02:56Tomorrow, I just want to know, that she anticipates you and we organize here,
02:59that during the air, I want to go and step and look at the place where Lohan disappeared,
03:07the Route 12, I'm going to get up very early to go, I want to see the algarrobal,
03:13I'm not going to enter the house of Grandma Catalina, I'm not interested in talking to absolutely anyone,
03:20except for some things that we have prepared that are a surprise, and I understand that we have achieved it.
03:25I want to step and see, right?
03:28I say, to see if a boy can be lost, if you really can't see,
03:34if 11 people in that place can't realize that they are stealing a boy,
03:39where they could have taken him, I say, because obviously ...
03:42You're going to have a bad time anyway, you're going to have a bad time.
03:44No, no.
03:45I think so.
03:46It's a beautiful place.
03:47No, no, it's okay, there is concrete information, it is said that they are going to have a bad time.
03:53Let's see, there is someone who is offering to take us to the algarrobal.
03:58It is Marcelo Hanson who is connected.
04:02Marce, dear, how are you? Diego, Nahuel, Carlitos, Omar and Lucia, this beautiful family from Alerta greets you.
04:09What a face today, huh?
04:10I don't know, I put up with it and I copied my shirt.
04:13I have the same one for tomorrow.
04:14Why don't you copy his hair? Sorry.
04:16Hey, leave me alone.
04:18Marce, today we are with things, personal events too, right?
04:21Yes.
04:22I understand that two of your children are very advanced in medicine and you are very happy about that.
04:30The truth is that yes, today the oldest approved his degree in the fifth year, so he is in the sixth.
04:37And the one who follows him is in the fifth, he will approve on Monday, on Tuesday, so they are both formally on vacation.
04:46And in fifth and sixth in medicine, the truth is that it is a pride for us, the parents, because they are the best thing we have in life, the children.
04:55Nahuel, you know that yesterday I brought it to give it to you too.
04:58I think you have a copy.
05:00I was reading the book The Satan of the Stairs, right?
05:03To know for sure about Leonardo Gentile, to know for sure where we are going, right?
05:13To try to know where we are going to step is the case of Ramoncito, this boy who was the victim of a satanic ritual, a satanic crime.
05:26And Dr. Hanson is the lawyer who represented the family at the time, we are talking about 2009.
05:33Many condiments, if not similar, almost the same, right?
05:37To the Logan case, and I sent Marcelo yesterday, I am going to reveal this infidelity, last night while I was reading, there on page 97, if I remember correctly,
05:48And at that moment, someone close to the family decided to contact the best lawyer in Corrientes, and he said your name, Marcelo, it's you, right?
06:00Marcelo Hanson, and he sent you, and he told me, well, there is some inaccuracy in the story, but well, it is indeed about me.
06:07I say so that everyone knows, even if it has already been time for this program, who is Marcelo Hanson, right?
06:13He is a lawyer who knows absolutely everything.
06:17It's like that, Marcelo, it's a compliment, I'm putting you in an uncomfortable place.
06:20I don't know what to do.
06:22Yes, at least make us a roast in exchange.
06:25Ah, I understand, you are asking for the roast, of course.
06:29To serve us the algarrobal, and a roast there in this field that you have.
06:33No, riding a horse is not what I do.
06:35We are not going to eat chicken, that's not it.
06:39No, not chicken.
06:41No, not because it disappears later.
06:43Ah, nothing here.
06:45No, because it disappears.
06:47Good, good.
06:49Well, what's going on in Corrientes, Marcelo? Are there any traces? Are they still there?
06:55Yes, they continued today, I understand that ...
06:59At this point, it's over.
07:01It has ended with a negative result.
07:04I believe that there is no lack of water.
07:08But so far, what they did, again, a negative result.
07:14But let's remember that all the water mirrors, according to the CIFEBU report,
07:21were tracked several times, by different methods and by different non-governmental organizations.
07:29And then the CIFEBU in charge with the non-governmental organizations.
07:35So that's it, tomorrow there is no tracking. Did we miss the tracings?
07:40You didn't miss anything.
07:42Look, we had already decided, we had already talked to Monti,
07:46and we believed that because of the elements that are in the cause,
07:52this tracking was not necessary.
07:54And to remember, this was ordered on the first days of September,
07:58that is, three months after it was ordered,
08:03at the request of the church.
08:05They were never told no from the beginning.
08:07They were told yes, well, it took three months to specify.
08:11Of course, the issue is how to say no.
08:13One puts on the shoes of the judge, of the prosecutors,
08:17how to say no to a family that is a victim and is looking for a son,
08:23by the parents of the OAN, who are the ones who appear representing their son in the file.
08:30The issue, Diego, is that they argued that the tracings were wrong.
08:38So I don't know what they are going to say now.
08:40That now they did well and now it does coincide with the fact that it was negative by chance.
08:46I was listening to Méndez today, giving Cecilia a note with that,
08:50which in an instant we will have connected,
08:52and it is as if he was justifying himself with the family, right?
08:56That gives me, as if saying,
09:00okay, calm down, they already paid me and we are doing everything.
09:04It was negative, but it is important that it was negative, right?
09:10Like an employee who justifies himself with his boss for a scam that was sent,
09:15or something that didn't go well.
09:17That's what I wanted to point out. Marcelo Carlos greets you.
09:20Yes, look, Carlitos, yes, it is a matter of procedural strategy.
09:26Marcelo, what is the real objective of sending a new tracing to the lagoon?
09:34Well, as I was saying, it is a procedural objective to avoid, according to them,
09:40possible claims of nullity, that it has not been searched well
09:44and could be as an argument in a future trial of some of the defenses.
09:49Which obviously does not exist in procedural law.
09:53The nullity for the nullity itself.
09:55That is, the nullity has to be argued, founded,
09:59and have caused a perjury to whoever invokes it.
10:02I believe that no matter how much any defense is encouraged to raise a nullity like that,
10:08the sack will fall and it will be rejected flat by any of the agencies in which it is raised.
10:16That is, that argument does not resist the analysis of anyone
10:20who has at least litigated several years in criminal law.
10:23Can I translate it to you? Can I translate it to Hanson in one word?
10:26Yes, of course.
10:27Smoke.
10:29Yes, what they are telling me, if you want I will name you,
10:33let me know if you want me to name you, I will name you,
10:36that they have already given up, that's it, that's it.
10:40Ah, they already realized that it was a lot.
10:42That there were no resources. Do you remember that there was no money for the remit?
10:46If you give me the OK, I'll give you the credit.
10:50It's a journalist, a colleague of ours, he's saying,
10:54they just told me that gentlemen, the raffling is over, we found water.
11:00We are not going to disguise ourselves as clowns, right?
11:02At this point today, but enough of the circus, right?
11:05Yes, tomorrow we can no longer.
11:06Enough of the circus.
11:07Now they go for, you see, they play with two cards.
11:11Raffling or Chiribín.
11:13Chiribín.
11:14The raffling is over, they already realized,
11:16enough of the shame, and now they go for Chiribín again.
11:22Is that so?
11:25Diego, are you asking me?
11:27Yes, to you.
11:28They go for Chiribín again.
11:30Yes, I have written, presented again, yes,
11:32requesting the same thing that they have been requesting.
11:35The prosecutors answered, arguing that this has already been resolved
11:41and that there is no new argument that they have introduced
11:45to insist on that again.
11:48The judge already verified, personally spoke with the defendant
11:54and verified that she ratified the defense
11:56and that she feels well defended by her lawyer.
11:59So there is nothing more to discuss.
12:02Of course, because they are human resources, right?
12:05It is a prosecutor who has to read, a prosecutor who has to sit down and write
12:09when he could be doing more transcendent things
12:12for this cause and for so many others that he must be in charge, right?
12:15But it also shows a detail,
12:17that evidently the lawsuit is also totally lost, right?
12:21Because what it is doing is judging the trial.
12:24It is the trial of the trial.
12:25What it does is look for, in itself,
12:28some technical flaw that Chiribín had,
12:31I don't know what are the reasons they want to have to imprison her,
12:36but it really leaves a lot to be desired, right?
12:39It leaves a lot to be desired.
12:44I invite you to look,
12:48to look on the internet,
12:52I don't understand what that is called,
12:54there is a page that says, tell it however you want,
12:58the last report that was released,
13:00the last report that was released.
13:03There you will know more or less who we are talking about
13:06and how the Quereyas sometimes play.
13:10There you will see a report that many are trying to trample on,
13:15but look there, tell it however you want.
13:18But apart from that, the Quereya is very worried, I saw it,
13:21I saw it in Polo's field.
13:22You saw the report, right?
13:23Yes.
13:24Polo, do you know both of them?
13:25In Polo's field, yes.
13:27Ah, in the field, ah!
13:28Yes, watching Luis Miguel.
13:30It's good, I like Luis Miguel.
13:32I saw it.
13:33Did you see it? Did you sing it?
13:35No, I didn't, I didn't.
13:37Don't blame the rain.
13:39Don't blame the rain.
13:41Don't blame the night, the square.
13:43Ah, Vanilla knows.
13:44Let's see how Vanilla is.
13:45Don't blame the rain.
13:46Put it on a little bit.
13:47Let's see, Hanson, I know you can wait for me.
13:49Can you put it on a little bit?
13:51He's a great singer, Correntino Hanson.
13:53Because I like that song.
13:55Let's see, can it be?
13:57Let's see.
13:59So I remember and I move to what my eyes saw.
14:04It's not because of the photo of...
14:06Of whom?
14:07You're talking about the photo of Juan Pablo Gallego.
14:09No, because I'm going to see Luis Miguel.
14:11I like Luis Miguel.
14:12Ah!
14:13He was there.
14:14Because I just saw a post last night that was...
14:18No, they're doing the tracking.
14:20How is he going to be there?
14:21He wasn't, no, no.
14:23Roberto was not there.
14:24Let's see, unless Cecilia Conesa surprises us with something.