• 3 minutes ago
"Game Palat Jaygi Agar Imran Khan...", Sahibzada Hamid Raza Breaks Big News
Transcript
00:00Sir, this committee is a very big committee.
00:04Such negotiations are also sensitive.
00:08There are three parties.
00:10It is very important to agree on at least two parties for such negotiations.
00:13It is a special establishment.
00:15You know that mastermind is Imran Khan.
00:21Today, two more people have joined.
00:23Mr. Jadhul Haq and Mr. Magsi have joined.
00:25This is a whole gang.
00:27Will such negotiations be possible?
00:29Is this serious enough for talks?
00:31Such negotiations are behind the curtains.
00:34When something comes out, it should come out.
00:37We three people were there today.
00:39One was Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf.
00:41Mr. Kaisar was there.
00:42Mr. Nasir Abbas was from MWM.
00:44And I was from SIC.
00:46We are three united parties.
00:48Now, the government also has a problem.
00:50The sensitivity of this committee and its effectiveness
00:55or its media hype, the government's political parties want to become a member of this committee.
01:01That's what I feel.
01:02This is my personal point of view.
01:03Maybe I am wrong.
01:04Do they want to become a problem to solve?
01:08No, some of them are serious.
01:10They are talking about solving the problem.
01:12For example, Mr. Magsi said this earlier.
01:15When the special committee meeting was held after the abduction of MNS from the Parliament House,
01:20he played a big role in it.
01:22Similarly, Mr. Ijaz-ul-Aqsa spoke very positively at that time.
01:25Mr. Ijaz-ul-Aqsa was very close to Mr. Tariq-e-Insaf.
01:28Yes, absolutely.
01:29If a positive person feeds into it and brings things closer,
01:32I think it will be easier.
01:33The rest is the government's prerogative.
01:35Mr. Kaisar, they didn't make two sides.
01:36They didn't make ten sides.
01:37That's not true.
01:38I say this because we see that such a thing is successful when it has a small mandate.
01:45The government claimed that it has the power.
01:48It has the power.
01:49It has the decision-making.
01:52Sir, we threw the ball in their court.
01:54You have been saying for eight months that you are the decision-maker,
01:57you are in power, you are in power.
02:00We would have given you the ball.
02:02What do you want?
02:03What did you talk about today?
02:05Today, we talked about the judicial commission on 9th May and 26th November.
02:10We talked about the release of the imprisoned workers.
02:14Including Imran Khan?
02:15Including Imran Khan.
02:16We talked about the martyrs.
02:21We talked about the torture of our workers.
02:24We talked about the torture of our parliamentarians.
02:29And most importantly, we talked about the negotiations.
02:33Some people came out, not from the committee, but from the ruling party,
02:37they came out and said that they would not be in the direction of Adayala,
02:40they would be without Khan.
02:42We made it clear that the negotiations would be in the direction of Imran Khan.
02:45They would be with his consent.
02:47They would be with his consultation.
02:49So, you give us access to Imran Khan.
02:51A lot of complaints were made about Khwaja Asif.
02:53What do I say about Khwaja Asif?
02:58My opinion about him is always very strict.
03:00At this age, a person develops a sense of justice.
03:04And a person tries not to hurt anyone with his attitude.
03:07Khwaja Asif is a personality, I think, of the Pakistani parliament,
03:10on whom he should be rewarded.
03:12He has no respect for anyone other than his own people.
03:16I am older than him.
03:21I feel ashamed to answer in his language.
03:24But the problem is that this is also a matter of our politics.
03:28When we discussed that day, he said that your language is also the most strict.
03:33Now, if you talk to me for a debate,
03:37Mr. Nawaz Sharif, you should not play the role of a law-abiding establishment.
03:42You should deal with the establishment first.
03:47The problem is that he is his spokesperson.
03:50You heard Mr. Nawaz Sharif today.
03:53When you talk to him, you talk about ending the party.
03:56You talk about ending Imran Khan.
03:58You talk about ending the party.
04:00This is his anger.
04:02You have kept people in jail for two years.
04:04The party has not ended.
04:06The party has started.
04:08The party has not ended.
04:10When Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged,
04:12it was assumed that in another 5-7 years,
04:14the people who were there at that time said that it would end.
04:17You have not been able to end the Bhutto phenomenon yet.
04:20Although it has shrunk to the extent of a morning.
04:22If the policies of Bhutto and Bebe Naseer had remained the same,
04:25then perhaps the old era of the People's Party of Pakistan would have happened.
04:30It has shrunk, but Bhutto is still present.
04:33What does the government say?
04:35When you said that you have hawks,
04:37they give such statements.
04:39I heard that there was a lot of talk.
04:41Who is going to talk harshly?
04:43You were mentioned.
04:45What did the government say to you later?
04:47They said that there are hawks on your side too.
04:49So let's forget about the hawks.
04:51What kind of hawks are you?
04:53Who are your hawks?
04:54God knows.
04:55Maybe it was a sign for me because of the past few days.
04:57Or it was a sign for someone else.
04:59Mr. Kashyap, you know that I have never spoken below the belt.
05:02I speak harshly.
05:04I do.
05:05A lot of people don't like me.
05:07Maybe that's why I also scold a lot of people.
05:09But I have never crossed that moral line and gone down.
05:13I stand firm and criticize Maryam Bebe.
05:15But I am sitting in your program and calling her Maryam Bebe.
05:18But it is my right to criticize her.
05:20Sir, that is political.
05:21I do that.
05:22And she should be in a circle.
05:24She has not nominated anyone from our side.
05:26God knows which hawk she thinks she is.
05:28But she must also be saying that your demands are not acceptable.
05:32She has said two demands.
05:34She has not said that.
05:36I was thinking today, what will happen if you are a king?
05:39I was thinking what will happen if you are a king.
05:42I said that you will keep your demands which you already have.
05:45Remove Imran Khan.
05:46She did not say no.
05:48She did not even say yes.
05:49If Imran Khan comes out, the game will be turned upside down.
05:53The government will not be able to run.
05:55Sir, if Imran Khan comes out, the game will be turned upside down.
05:58Let's wait and see.
06:00You want us to audit the 8th election.
06:04Sir, listen to me.
06:05Do you know why?
06:06Sir, listen to me.
06:07This is the third party.
06:08Do you know this?
06:09Yes.
06:10This is the third party.
06:11Let's leave the first one.
06:12This is the third party.
06:13You want us to go to Madhya Pradesh.
06:15You want us to revisit the 26th amendment.
06:17You want us to end it.
06:18The court was freed.
06:19What will happen?
06:20It will be over.
06:21You want us to follow the law.
06:23You want us to follow the law.
06:25This is a joke.
06:26This cannot happen.
06:27Sir, this is a joke for them.
06:29All your demands are not feasible for them.
06:32Sir, the first two demands are feasible.
06:34Which ones?
06:35Can there be a judicial commission or not?
06:37No.
06:38If they don't want a judicial commission, why don't they do it?
06:41Look, there are two views.
06:42One is that we did not do it on 9th.
06:44The other is that the bullets were fired and the murders took place.
06:47This is your claim.
06:49Yes.
06:50So, the issue is that the government has to go either this way or that way.
06:53The judicial commission will be formed.
06:55So, the results will be controlled.
06:57If you say it will be free, then the results cannot be controlled.
07:00There will be a lot of questions.
07:02How did you reach there?
07:04How did this happen?
07:05How did that happen?
07:06Sir, if they don't agree on a judicial commission, then our claims will be proven to be true.
07:10Then there is something really fishy-fishy.
07:12Because of this, you are not taking us to a judicial commission.
07:14Tell me one thing after the break.
07:15Let's go.
07:16One of them says that we agree to two of your claims.
07:19He says this on the basis of a presumption.
07:21I am going on a break.
07:22Come back and tell me.
07:23He will say, okay, you agree to two of our claims.
07:25You run this government.
07:27You will not tease it for 2-3 years.
07:30Then what will happen?
07:31I will answer this question after the break.
07:33Let's take a break, viewers.
07:34Obviously, when there is a discussion, it is based on some people and some people.
07:37We are agreeing, sir.
07:38Yes, this is right.

Recommended