• 14 hours ago
UN special rapporteur hits US sanctions on ICC

US decision to put sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) is a 'shocking move,' the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers says on Feb. 12, 2025 urging the international community to give a strong response. The sanctions, which repeat action Trump took during his first term, include freezing of US assets of those designated and barring them and their families from visiting the United States.

REUTERS VIDEO

Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe
Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net
Follow us:
Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook
Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram
Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter
DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion

Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital

Check out our Podcasts:
Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify
Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts
Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic
Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer
Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcher
Tune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein
Soundcloud: https://tmt.ph/soundcloud

#TheManilaTimes
#tmtnews
#unitednations
#ussanctions
#internationalcriminalcourt
Transcript
00:00Even though we knew that this was likely to happen,
00:03it's a shocking move.
00:04It is a true blow to the international rule of law
00:09and a direct punch in the face to a court
00:13that is the only one the international community
00:15can count on to hold to account people
00:18who are responsible for the most grave crimes.
00:21So honestly, it's shocking, it's unacceptable,
00:25and it requires a very robust response
00:28from the other member states
00:29of the International Criminal Court.
00:33The initial response of a statement is excellent,
00:36but now what we need to see is, for example,
00:38the EU's blocking statute should be activated
00:42so that the official who has been sanctioned
00:46does not have to experience the sanctions
00:48in Europe at minimum.
00:50And then I think we also need to expect
00:53that there will be additional individuals potentially named.
00:57But concretely, it is a very serious and problematic thing
01:02to be targeted by the US government with sanctions.
01:05It means that your assets will be frozen,
01:08that you have no ability to use any kind of account
01:11that has dollars associated with it,
01:14that any kind of assets you might have
01:16that would touch the United States would be suddenly frozen,
01:19that you cannot get a visa to the US,
01:22which could, for a prosecutor
01:24of the International Criminal Court,
01:26really could throw a wrench,
01:27not only in his ability to meet with officials,
01:30to meet with human rights defenders,
01:32with perhaps even witnesses and victims,
01:36but also his capacity to easily go
01:38to and from the UN headquarters.
01:40So these are very, very severe potential consequences.
01:45This reminds us that these sanctions
01:47are meant to be for terrorism, terrorists,
01:51and for those, for example,
01:53involved in horrible crimes of trafficking
01:57or drug trafficking.
01:58And applying them now to a court
02:02implicates human rights lawyers
02:05who might be simply trying to get accountability
02:08for grave crimes and cooperating with the prosecutor.
02:12They could potentially be charged with material support
02:16for assisting a sanctioned person.
02:18That is shocking.
02:20So it's more severe in that way.
02:22It's an immediate reaction to the court's activity
02:27in a particular situation,
02:29in a situation where the international community
02:32unfortunately failed to stop grave violations
02:36against the people in Gaza.
02:38And now we need accountability for that situation.
02:41And instead, what we're getting is a powerful state
02:45sanctioning, attacking under law, the court.
02:50It's totally shocking.
02:52And I think for that reason,
02:53we need to keep the context in mind.

Recommended