👉 La diputada Margarita Stolbizer del bloque Encuentro Federal ha solicitado que el presidente se presente ante el Congreso para responder a acusaciones de uso indebido de información y servicios del Estado para beneficio propio. La diputada sostiene que las acciones del presidente son "imperdonables" y podrían ser pasibles de sanciones.
👉 Seguí en #BuenDíaA24
👉 Seguí en #BuenDíaA24
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00There's also a lot of security and diplomatic cars that are having a meeting at this time,
00:08which is already agreed with an agenda, with people from the United States.
00:12Gabriel Prosper is in Congress, but we also have Margarita Stolviser from the federal meeting block.
00:20Deputy Stolviser, I'm Luis Novaresio. Good day, 24. How are you?
00:24Good day. How are you? How are you?
00:26Your proposal is for the president to come to Congress?
00:31Yes, we came to a permanent meeting of the block online,
00:37and we will continue to be there these days to see how the situation evolves.
00:43We are asking for information, we are going to ask for an interpellation.
00:46We need them to come and give explanations.
00:49Faced with the negative, if this were to happen, let's say,
00:53it is obvious that the situation would be more and more serious,
00:56and then the Congress would enable all the measures and sanctions that could correspond.
01:03Today, we are still waiting for the explanations.
01:06This is the first day, so let's see what they say.
01:11So far, the defenses that some officials have made,
01:14some allies, almost servile officials of the executive power,
01:20are shameful, I would dare to say,
01:23in the same way that many colleagues of yours in the media justify everything
01:29trying to focus on the people who could have done a business.
01:34And the truth is that what worries us is the barbarity and the scandal
01:39starring the president himself in the promotion, let's say,
01:44of an account that has allowed some people, well, to really earn millions,
01:51as it has caused losses to others.
01:54The epitome is extremely serious and is at the limit of the criminal figure, right?
01:59Of course. This was my next question, because I said,
02:01at least it must be analyzed, personally I will not prejudge,
02:05if there is a use of the state for the promotion of a private activity,
02:10which on top of that is a total waste.
02:12There are three statements, the state through the president's Twitter,
02:16that's it, let's finish with this story that when the president speaks on Twitter,
02:20he speaks for himself, not as head of state, this division does not exist.
02:23I say, promoting a private activity, my question is,
02:26is there a collision with the public ethics law?
02:29Yes, I have no doubt that there is,
02:32and in reality it seems to me that it is also in this that some people
02:37try to disfigure the president.
02:39I don't think the problem is the state either.
02:43It seems to me that the problem is the president personally,
02:47and therefore it is the same person who is responsible for all the sanctions
02:52that correspond to the very flagrant violation of public ethics,
02:59especially the obligations that a public official has to fulfill,
03:04such as abstaining from using information acquired
03:08for the fulfillment of his functions,
03:11to carry out activities in his official tasks,
03:14or to allow his use in the benefit of private interests of his own or of others,
03:19and abstaining from using state services for that particular benefit.
03:25Now, who incurs in this very serious lack for public ethics,
03:30in my opinion, for some criminal figure too,
03:33is the president of the nation.
03:35So the problem is that he is involved,
03:38he could be liable for a sanction,
03:40it is him, but he in the exercise of his function, right?
03:44And then there is one more thing that I don't want to miss.
03:49There has not been a mistake here, as some pretend.
03:52There is a very clear premeditation,
03:55and there is a succession of meetings
03:57that the Secretary General of the Presidency has had.
04:00I would say not only that she has to take responsibility
04:03for all the private meetings that Ms. Karina Milley
04:07has had with those responsible for this account,
04:10but that she should start controlling the accounts of the lady herself, right?
04:15With the aggravating fact that being her, being the presidential spokeswoman,
04:19it strikes me that, just like other officials,
04:22they jumped in the air when they made a mistake,
04:25and the president himself has raised the issue
04:28of how to get officials out of trouble when they make mistakes.
04:32Well, that Karina Milley and Adorni are still in charge
04:36is because what they did, they did it in representation of the president,
04:40for the president, right?
04:42Now, Margarita, Lucia Salinas greets you. How are you?
04:45Hi Lucia, how are you?
04:46Good. Is it enough to say that the president was not aware,
04:51he was not advised?
04:53A while ago we heard one of the people in charge of this cryptocurrency
04:57dismissing any kind of responsibility of the president of the nation.
05:02Are these arguments enough?
05:16I am ashamed to say that this can be an argument
05:21to defend the president of the nation.
05:24I insist, he doesn't even make a repost,
05:27he writes himself, spreads, promotes, let's say,
05:31in a personal way, generates profits and losses
05:35with people who had had a direct, personal, even work-related relationship with him
05:41and who have met ten times with his sister in recent months.
05:45The truth is that it is impossible to think that this was part of a mistake,
05:49or a distraction, right?
05:51I think it is an unforgivable situation,
05:54unforgivable in the investiture of a president of the nation
05:57who also knows about economy, he knows about finance.
06:00Margarita, thank you.
06:02No, thank you.
06:03See you later, congresswoman.
06:04Luis, we are trying to go through the whole political arc.
06:07We would also love to speak with the referents of Libertad Avanza
06:10to give their position.
06:12We haven't been able to do it yet,
06:14but we will surely be able to do it.
06:16Tell me more, professor.
06:17Let's see.
06:18Some questions I want to ask in relation to what Margarita Stolbicer said.
06:21In terms of judicial politics,
06:24that is, in terms of investigating and judging the president,
06:28something you mentioned at the beginning of the program,
06:31we have to go to tradition.
06:32There is no interpellation of the president of the nation in Argentine tradition.
06:36Interpelling the president of the nation can only be done
06:39in terms of the opening of a process of political trial.
06:42We haven't had it open either.
06:46No.
06:47It hasn't been frequent.
06:48That is, Alfonso wanted to look for a system,
06:51the parliamentary system,
06:52where the one who exercised the administration
06:54had to account for the...
06:55There is an interpellation of the head of the cabinet...
06:58It is a power intervening over the other.
07:00Sure.
07:01Yes, it can be in the framework of a political trial.
07:03Today there is no number for a political trial.
07:06In my opinion, with all the love you have for him,
07:10Margarita has just included a huge number of prejudices
07:13about issues that still need to be investigated,
07:16that are not within the framework of what has been proven yet.
07:20If you ask me what I think is going to happen in the government,
07:23and at this moment,
07:24what is the government doing politically, Luis?
07:26Looking for a culprit?
07:28The truth is that...
07:29It happens that they are thrown away and they are thrown away again.
07:32The truth is that the Argentines...
07:33Let's see, the one who burns himself with milk comes here and cries.
07:35We have so many years and so many politicians
07:38who got out of where they could and where they wanted to
07:41and so many girls who cried.
07:43The truth is that the first one to jump starts to doubt.
07:45What I say is crazy.
07:47I would say that there is too much at stake
07:49compared to what happened to us in recent years
07:51and people are panicking because there is too much at stake
07:53to make these mistakes.
07:55I think it is interesting what Moomy introduces,
07:58which is political analysis.