During a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) questioned Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo about childcare requirements and the impact on US workforce.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00the ranking member from the great state of Illinois, Ms. Schakowsky, for five
00:04minutes of questioning. Thank you. Thank you. Well I'm excited to raise this issue.
00:09I understand that in commerce that what you're doing is requiring child care for
00:18some workers, that it be provided from companies that deal with
00:30semiconductors. Child care, can you talk about that? Yes, thank you. So it's not, we
00:39are not actually requiring companies to provide child care, but what we are doing
00:45is saying to companies, if you want taxpayer money, you need to prove to us
00:51that you'll be successful, that you'll be a good steward of taxpayer money. That
00:56means prove to us that you're going to be able to hire the workers you need in
01:00the timeline that you need them. And so we've asked every company who wants
01:06money to give us a workforce plan. Show us, what are you going to do to train
01:10people? To, you know, hire people from high schools and community colleges and
01:15the like? And how are you going to make sure you have women on the job? Every one
01:22of you knows, in your districts, we are at a historically low unemployment rate. The
01:28unemployment rate in the building trades right now is essentially zero. It's a
01:32couple of percent. If you're building a fab, it'll require somewhere between five
01:36and ten thousand construction workers to build that fab. You will not be
01:40successful unless you find a way to get women into these jobs, and you will not
01:45be successful at that unless you have a child care plan. So what we're saying to
01:50companies is, convince us you'll do a good job of taxpayer money, hiring and
01:54recruiting women, and making sure that they have access to high-quality
01:59affordable child care, otherwise they're not going to get the job done. So I feel
02:03strongly about this. This isn't social policy, this is math. They have to get the
02:08job done with taxpayer money. They have to have women engineers, construction
02:12workers, scientists, technicians, and that means thinking about child care. So though
02:17it may not be required, you are mentioning child care as a way to get
02:23the women more involved, right? Yes, absolutely. Excellent. Let me let me ask
02:29you this, or discuss this. I think it is really important that we are protecting
02:39abroad all the the data and the privacy. We've been working on privacy issues
02:46here in this in the subcommittee and in this in this committee. So I am just
02:53wondering what Commerce is doing to protect Americans' data internationally,
03:02especially from China. Yeah, so first of all I want to agree with you and
03:09Congresswoman McMorris-Rogers that we absolutely need a federal privacy
03:14legislation and I applaud the work of this committee for getting us there.
03:18We're behind the rest of the world, so I support that. On top of that, a couple of
03:25areas where I'm very focused. You saw last week that the Commerce Department
03:29essentially banned Kaspersky, which is a Russian antivirus software company. We
03:37say you can't do business in America anymore because we think the Russians,
03:40Russian government, are going to take America's data and put it back to Russia.
03:45I've recently launched an initiative around connected vehicles. I literally
03:51shudder to think of the risks to America's data and privacy of, let's say
03:56we had a million Chinese cars on the road, all connected, all collecting data
04:01from Americans, all of it going back to Beijing. So we are being very aggressive.
04:07Commerce Department has just put out, we're going through a rulemaking process
04:11on that. So I think, I don't, you know, I could go on and on with AI. It's another
04:16risk. We're thinking hard about cybersecurity and data protection as it
04:20relates to AI. I think we have to move forward with technology, absolutely. We
04:26have to lead the world, but more and more we're getting concerned about protecting
04:30American consumers and children for making sure that our data doesn't get
04:36into the hands of the PRC. Thank you. I want to just go back to that issue that
04:42I had raised earlier about the workers who are concerned that, especially CHIPS
04:50workers. I have been hearing this from labor unions and the Labor Caucus and I
05:00just wondered if you had any comment on that. Look, it is concerning. It's
05:05unacceptable. It is concerning. We're working hand-in-glove with the
05:09Department of Labor. We have put out a set of good jobs principles which we
05:14developed in partnership with the Department of Labor. If we're going to
05:17provide taxpayer money to companies, we expect the jobs that they create to be
05:21high-paying and safe working conditions. So we expect workers in those fabs to
05:29have the right to unionize, should they choose. So it is a priority, President
05:35Biden obviously cares deeply about this and so we're working on it. Thank you so
05:40much. I yield back.