Salman Akram Raja's powerful conversation with CJP Isa on reserved seats case

  • 2 months ago
#11thHour #ImranKhan #PTI #ReservedSeats #SalmanAkramRaja #WaseemBadami #ElectionCommission #SupremeCourt #QaziFeazIsa #JusticeAtharMinallah

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.
Transcript
00:00Mr. Salman, I would like to show you a glimpse of today's program and then I would like to start the program with you.
00:10Show me. I thought that by answering a question, I would look like a foreigner. I would like to start from here.
00:16Show me the clip.
00:17If I ask you today, because there is a statutory declaration which says you belong to Nazirat.
00:23I know what my lord is saying.
00:26Listen to me.
00:28There is a reason why I am interrupting.
00:30No, no.
00:31This is a matter before the courts. I would request my lord not to make any comment.
00:35Please, it is not a comment, it is a question.
00:38There is a statute declaration which shows you as Nazirati.
00:41There is a certificate which you referred to which shows you as PTI.
00:45And now you are saying you are Sunni.
00:49You may not respond to it.
00:52Can you just tell me which political party you belong to?
00:55I do not want to respond to this question.
00:57You are not before us.
01:00You are, you keep referring to yourself.
01:02They find my papers. I don't know why.
01:04You are party-less. I mean, it is not a state secret.
01:08It is a factual plea.
01:10To be the person Salman Akram Raja is not relevant.
01:12I will, with great respect, not answer that question at the moment.
01:16Salman sir, I would like to request you, as much as we know you,
01:19you are not even compared to TV anchors in talk shows.
01:23You are not even compared to your colleagues in the Jamaat.
01:29You are not even compared to them.
01:31I don't know, have I ever seen you in the Supreme Court,
01:34I mean, my bad luck,
01:36I have never seen you practicing in the Supreme Court in Pakistan.
01:40I have not seen you in person.
01:41You were not present there.
01:42So, I don't know if this is your usual behavior in court.
01:45Otherwise, I felt that this is very different from your temperament.
01:48So, is there any special reason for this,
01:50that you seem to be a snob?
01:52Are you a snob to an individual on the bench?
01:55Or are you a snob to some criminals?
01:57Are you upset? Are you angry?
01:59Why do you seem to be a little jittery?
02:02This is my innocent question to start with.
02:07No, no, this is your right question.
02:09Look, there are a few cases that were in front of the court.
02:13I did not hesitate to answer any of their questions.
02:19There are a few things that affect the court in the same way.
02:25The question of which political party I belong to,
02:28has nothing to do with this case.
02:30And that is why I requested that you do not ask this question,
02:34because I, as Salman Akram Raja, am not presenting myself to you.
02:37I am presenting myself as a lawyer,
02:40whether it is Qawwal Shauzab or PTI.
02:42So, it has nothing to do with my personal question.
02:48I am not confused.
02:50I have said it in a very polite manner
02:52that I will not answer this question,
02:54because in my opinion it is irrelevant.
02:56And the way Jahia Afridi supported me,
02:58she also said that you should not answer this question.
03:00So, there are such things.
03:03In a judicial process, which is surrounded by many hours and many days,
03:08we keep on talking.
03:10I have been in touch with these judges for 20-25 years.
03:13So, there are many things that we do to each other.
03:17The fact that you have chosen this,
03:19was the most important thing in today's proceedings.
03:22No, no, I said this because I did not want to study from the case,
03:26but I wanted to study from your temperament.
03:29I did not get angry at all.
03:32I said this because of your general temperament.
03:35I said it in a very polite manner that I will not answer this question,
03:41but this is not an issue.
03:43You have repeatedly said that this is an unrelated question.
03:48Did you see any other purpose in this question,
03:51because of which you thought it was irrelevant?
03:56And you said, I chose not to answer this question.
03:59It is like this, I do not want to talk much on this.
04:02I will not talk about what I did not talk about in court in your program.
04:07In my opinion, this question was irrelevant.
04:10Okay, now I come to the case.
04:12Sir, you tell me, Salman Khan,
04:15was this matter surprising to you for some reason,
04:18or were you expecting that when the case is closed today,
04:22there will be a short order?
04:24Or is this also a common thing?
04:26Obviously, we know that it is not always the case that a decision is made on that day.
04:29So, is this a matter for you?
04:31And obviously, the purpose of asking this question is that
04:34it is being evaluated, which I do not even want to discuss here,
04:36but it is being evaluated on social media.
04:38People talk about all kinds of things.
04:39It should be given importance, not that it is a different topic.
04:41So, do you think this is also a common thing?
04:43Or is this a matter of concern or surprise for you
04:46that why did not it get a short order today?
04:48Look, our desire was that the short order should come today.
04:53And in the past, many cases, which we call big cases,
04:57historical cases,
04:59be it the case of NRO,
05:01be it the case of Asghar Khan,
05:03be it the case of Adli Abahali,
05:08there are countless cases.
05:10In them, it has usually happened that
05:12on the last day, a short order,
05:14even if it is a few hours late,
05:16comes.
05:18Now today, since the short order did not come,
05:21when it seemed that some judges thought
05:24that we should give a short order today,
05:27it certainly creates a little concern,
05:30there are doubts.
05:31We know what the environment is,
05:33what shadows are surrounding the court.
05:36So, we think that legal and judicial matters
05:39should reach their final conclusion as soon as possible.
05:44So, our desire is that the short order should come soon.
05:48Of course, the detailed order will come later,
05:52but our desire is that the short order should come soon.
05:55And sir, if I ask you this,
05:57you are in a position, which you have also expressed in the court,
06:00that you have no doubt about any judge,
06:03at least there is no complaint,
06:06the opinion can be different,
06:08the method is different,
06:10but you have no doubt about the intent of this case,
06:14or you have no desire that it would be better
06:17if there was something different from the case.
06:20Look, this is also a question that I will not answer,
06:24because it is related to the attitude of a political community.
06:29In this regard, our opinion is there,
06:32but at the moment I will not express it.
06:36If we come to the issues of the case,
06:41then I will be able to talk more.
06:45What was the case in this case?
06:47What was our opinion?
06:49And why do we think that our opinion is correct
06:52and the opinion of other communities is wrong?
06:54I think this should be known to the people of Pakistan.

Recommended