Salman Akram Raja explained court decision and Election Act

  • last month
#SawalYehHai #ImranKhan #ReservedSeats #JusticeMansoorAliShah #SalmanAkramRaja #SupremeCourt #QaziFaezIsa #PMShehbazSharif #AsimMunir #Establishment #BarristerDaniyalChaudhry

Executive has no choice but to comply with court orders: Justice Shah says not acting on verdicts is ‘constitutional violation’

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00on the basis of judgement.
00:02No, you are wrong.
00:04It is a clear judgement.
00:06Maybe they are reading it wrongly on purpose
00:08or their legal advisers are not able to understand
00:10what the decision is.
00:12The decision is based on the law,
00:14not on any law.
00:16Keep this in mind.
00:18When it is based on the law,
00:20you can only change it
00:22by changing the law.
00:24You cannot change it by simple legislation.
00:26They have explained that
00:28Article 51, section 6
00:30and the one for the National Assembly
00:32require that
00:34the party which
00:36contested the elections
00:38and got the seats,
00:40they should get special seats
00:42on the basis of that.
00:44This is the basic
00:46will of the law.
00:48If this was not the case,
00:50the Parliament
00:52and the National Assembly
00:54would have been a non-legislative
00:56National Assembly.
00:58Article 17 would have been
01:00non-legislative.
01:02This is the decision.
01:04It has nothing to do with any law.
01:06All the laws that have been made
01:08are not based on
01:10Article 51 or Article 106
01:12for the National Assembly.
01:14They are machinery
01:16provisions.
01:18They have said that
01:20the basic aim of this law
01:22is to establish a democratic government
01:24and a democratic government
01:26cannot be established
01:28if you give special seats
01:30to a party which has won
01:32three seats and you give
01:34ten seats to that party.
01:36Then it becomes a non-legislative
01:38National Assembly.
01:40This is the right decision.
01:42They have realized
01:44that the candidates
01:46were from the PTI.
01:48We all went as PTI candidates.
01:50At 10.30 on 13th January,
01:52there is a decision
01:54which says that you should not
01:56sign the ballot.
01:58After that, the Election Commission
02:00says that since you do not want
02:02to sign, we will make you
02:04independent.
02:06This is where the destruction
02:08of the system begins.
02:10We had gone there as PTI candidates.
02:12We had filed a nomination paper.
02:14We had tickets.
02:16We had to collect the tickets
02:18on 13th January.
02:20We had to give you
02:22the symbol of independent candidates.
02:24We would have given you the ticket
02:26if we had to give you the symbol
02:28of PTI.
02:30Since we are not giving you
02:32the PTI symbol, we will not
02:34give you the PTI ticket.
02:36I gave an example of what happened
02:38with me.
02:40Since I was a lawyer,
02:42I collected my ticket and
02:44received it.
02:46The Election Commission lied
02:48and said that we will not
02:50take your ticket.
02:52This is very important.
02:54Because of this,
02:56the Supreme Court said that
02:58since the Election Commission
03:00made this fundamental mistake,
03:02it is necessary that the reality
03:04is that the people of Pakistan
03:06have voted for PTI.
03:08They have voted for PTI candidates.
03:10Therefore, we will consider them
03:12as PTI candidates.
03:14All we need is that they
03:16accept PTI.
03:18They are making
03:20a mistake
03:22for three days.
03:24If someone is elected
03:26as an independent candidate,
03:28he can join a party
03:30in three days.
03:32The Supreme Court said that
03:34you were not elected as an independent candidate.
03:36You were elected as a PTI candidate.
03:38We believe that you were elected
03:40as a PTI candidate.
03:42No party is joining you.
03:44The issue is that
03:46technically, it is Mr. Tariq Khan's position.
03:48But since you have amended it in the Election Act,
03:50Mr. Tariq Khan is going to challenge it.
03:52We have done it.
03:54We are going to challenge it.
03:56What will be the political
03:58and legal scenario?
04:00Will the seats be in limbo?
04:02That would be an ideal scenario for you.
04:06I don't think
04:08that there is such a situation.
04:10It would have been better
04:12if it was a case of first impression.
04:14It would have been better
04:16if there was some misunderstanding.
04:18It would have been better
04:20if it was a case of first impression.
04:22According to the law,
04:24the chairman of the Sunni Atheism Council
04:26did not contest.
04:28PTI is not before us.
04:30Considering this,
04:32and considering the security,
04:34since the constitution of the SIC
04:36does not allow
04:38non-Muslims to become members,
04:40they cannot get these seats.
04:42But we send this matter to the parliament.
04:44Legislation should be done
04:46in the parliament.
04:48Judges are not legislators.
04:50Judges cannot make law.
04:52They can only interpret the constitution.
04:54They have to interpret
04:56the constitution and the law.
04:58In all this,
05:00a review has been filed
05:02by the Election Commission of Pakistan
05:04and other candidates
05:06from whom these seats were taken.
05:08The 80 affidavits
05:10of the Sunni Atheism Council
05:12were not challenged
05:14at any stage.
05:16They were not called
05:18and asked to show their affiliation
05:20according to the constitution
05:22within three days.
05:24They were considered independent.
05:26The constitution and the law
05:28are clear.
05:30The constitution and the law
05:32say that they were free
05:34and after being elected,
05:36you cannot interpret
05:38the constitution and the law
05:40as you wish.
05:42You have to interpret
05:44the constitution and the law
05:46as it is.

Recommended