KHABAR | Aniqa Nisar | Constitutional Courts | ARY News | 19th September 2024

  • 5 days ago
#Khabar #ConstitutionalAmendment #PMLNGovt #PMShehbazSharif #FazalUrRehman #ImranKhan #AsifZardari #QaziFaezIsa #AsimMunir #NationalAssembly

(Current Affairs)

Host:
- Aniqa Nisar

Guests:
- Ali Muhammad Khan (PTI)
- Kamran Murtaza (JUIF)
- Jahangir Jadoon (Lawyer)
- Hasan Raza Pasha (Lawyer)

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.

Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia

Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial

Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv

Website: https://arynews.tv

Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv

Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio

Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial
#ARYNews

ARY News Official YouTube Channel.
For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.
Transcript
00:00Bismillah hir rahman nir raheem.
00:29Hi, I am Anika Nisar.
00:31One thing is clear.
00:33I.N.E.T has not been formalized yet.
00:35But the cases are still going on.
00:37And the proof of that is
00:39that in I.N.E.T
00:41there is an action
00:43on changing the number game.
00:45That action is very important.
00:47That is important
00:49because today I have two letters.
00:51These two letters were written to
00:53the Election Commission of Pakistan.
00:55One letter was written by
00:57the President of Pakistan,
00:59and one letter was written
01:01by the Speaker of the Punjab Assembly,
01:03Malik Mohammad Ahmed Khan.
01:05There is something very interesting
01:07in both of these letters.
01:09It is about the law
01:11which came in the Gazette
01:13on 9th August.
01:15Amendment to the
01:17Amendment to the
01:19Amendment to the
01:21Amendment to the
01:23Amendment to the
01:25Amendment to the
01:27Amendment to the
01:29Amendment to the
01:31Amendment to the
01:33Amendment to the
01:35Amendment to the
01:37Amendment to the
01:39Amendment to the
01:41Amendment to the
01:43Amendment to the
01:45Amendment to the
01:47Amendment to the
01:49Amendment to the
01:51Amendment to the
01:53Amendment to the
01:55Amendment to the
01:57Amendment to the
01:59Amendment to the
02:01Amendment to the
02:03Amendment to the
02:05Amendment to the
02:07Amendment to the
02:09Amendment to the
02:11Amendment to the
02:13Amendment to the
02:15Amendment to the
02:17Amendment to the
02:19Amendment to the
02:21Amendment to the
02:23Amendment to the
02:25Amendment to the
02:27Amendment to the
02:29Amendment to the
02:31Amendment to the
02:33Amendment to the
02:35Amendment to the
02:37Amendment to the
02:39Amendment to the
02:41Amendment to the
02:43Amendment to the
02:45Amendment to the
02:47Amendment to the
02:49Amendment to the
02:51Amendment to the
02:53Amendment to the
02:55Amendment to the
02:57Amendment to the
02:59Amendment to the
03:01Amendment to the
03:03Amendment to the
03:05Amendment to the
03:07Amendment to the
03:09Amendment to the
03:11Amendment to the
03:13Amendment to the
03:15Amendment to the
03:17Amendment to the
03:19Amendment to the
03:21Amendment to the
03:23Amendment to the
03:25Amendment to the
03:27Amendment to the
03:29Amendment to the
03:31Amendment to the
03:33Amendment to the
03:35Amendment to the
03:37Amendment to the
03:39Amendment to the
03:41Amendment to the
03:43Amendment to the
03:45Amendment to the
03:47Amendment to the
03:49Amendment to the
03:51Amendment to the
03:53Amendment to the
03:55Amendment to the
03:57Amendment to the
03:59Amendment to the
04:01Amendment to the
04:03Amendment to the
04:05Amendment to the
04:07Amendment to the
04:09Amendment to the
04:11Amendment to the
04:13Amendment to the
04:15Amendment to the
04:17Amendment to the
04:19Amendment to the
04:21Amendment to the
04:23Amendment to the
04:25Amendment to the
04:27Amendment to the
04:29Amendment to the
04:31Amendment to the
04:33Amendment to the
04:35Amendment to the
04:37Amendment to the
04:39Amendment to the
04:41Amendment to the
04:43Amendment to the
04:45Amendment to the
04:47Amendment to the
04:49Amendment to the
04:51Amendment to the
04:53Amendment to the
04:55Amendment to the
04:57Amendment to the
04:59Amendment to the
05:01Amendment to the
05:03Amendment to the
05:05Amendment to the
05:07Amendment to the
05:09Amendment to the
05:11Amendment to the
05:13Amendment to the
05:15Amendment to the
05:17Amendment to the
05:19Amendment to the
05:21Amendment to the
05:23Amendment to the
05:25Amendment to the
05:27Amendment to the
05:29Amendment to the
05:31Amendment to the
05:33Amendment to the
05:35Amendment to the
05:37Amendment to the
05:39Amendment to the
05:41Amendment to the
05:43Amendment to the
05:45Amendment to the
05:47Amendment to the
05:49Amendment to the
05:51Amendment to the
05:53Amendment to the
05:55Amendment to the
05:57Amendment to the
05:59Amendment to the
06:01Amendment to the
06:03Amendment to the
06:05Amendment to the
06:07Amendment to the
06:09Amendment to the
06:11Amendment to the
06:13Amendment to the
06:15Amendment to the
06:17Amendment to the
06:19Amendment to the
06:21Amendment to the
06:23Amendment to the
06:25Amendment to the
06:27Amendment to the
06:29Amendment to the
06:31Amendment to the
06:33Amendment to the
06:35Amendment to the
06:37Amendment to the
06:39Amendment to the
06:41Amendment to the
06:43Amendment to the
06:45Amendment to the
06:47Amendment to the
06:49Amendment to the
06:51Amendment to the
06:53Amendment to the
06:55Amendment to the
06:57Amendment to the
06:59Amendment to the
07:01Amendment to the
07:03Amendment to the
07:05Amendment to the
07:07Amendment to the
07:09Amendment to the
07:11Amendment to the
07:13Amendment to the
07:15Amendment to the
07:17Amendment to the
07:19Amendment to the
07:21Amendment to the
07:23Amendment to the
07:25Amendment to the
07:27Amendment to the
07:29Amendment to the
07:31Amendment to the
07:33Amendment to the
07:35Amendment to the
07:37Amendment to the
07:39Amendment to the
07:41Amendment to the
07:43Amendment to the
07:45Amendment to the
07:47Amendment to the
07:49Amendment to the
07:51Amendment to the
07:53Amendment to the
07:55Amendment to the
07:57Amendment to the
07:59Amendment to the
08:01Amendment to the
08:03Amendment to the
08:05Amendment to the
08:07Amendment to the
08:09Amendment to the
08:11Amendment to the
08:13Amendment to the
08:15Amendment to the
08:17Amendment to the
08:19Amendment to the
08:21Amendment to the
08:23Amendment to the
08:25Amendment to the
08:27Amendment to the
08:29Amendment to the
08:31Amendment to the
08:33Amendment to the
08:35Amendment to the
08:37Amendment to the
08:39Amendment to the
08:41Amendment to the
08:43Amendment to the
08:45Amendment to the
08:47Amendment to the
08:49Amendment to the
08:51Amendment to the
08:53Amendment to the
08:55Amendment to the
08:57Amendment to the
08:59Amendment to the
09:01Amendment to the
09:03Amendment to the
09:05Amendment to the
09:07Amendment to the
09:09Amendment to the
09:11Amendment to the
09:13Amendment to the
09:15Amendment to the
09:17Amendment to the
09:19Amendment to the
09:21Amendment to the
09:23Amendment to the
09:25Amendment to the
09:27Amendment to the
09:29Amendment to the
09:31Amendment to the
09:33Amendment to the
09:35Amendment to the
09:37Amendment to the
09:39Amendment to the
09:41Amendment to the
09:43Amendment to the
09:45Amendment to the
09:47Amendment to the
09:49Amendment to the
09:51Amendment to the
09:53Amendment to the
09:55Amendment to the
09:57Amendment to the
09:59Amendment to the
10:01Amendment to the
10:03Amendment to the
10:05Amendment to the
10:07Amendment to the
10:09Amendment to the
10:11Amendment to the
10:13Amendment to the
10:15Amendment to the
10:17Amendment to the
10:19Amendment to the
10:21Amendment to the
10:23Amendment to the
10:25Amendment to the
10:27Amendment to the
10:29Amendment to the
10:31Amendment to the
10:33Amendment to the
10:35Amendment to the
10:37Amendment to the
10:39Amendment to the
10:41Amendment to the
10:43Amendment to the
10:45Amendment to the
10:47Amendment to the
10:49Amendment to the
10:51Amendment to the
10:53Amendment to the
10:55Amendment to the
10:57Amendment to the
10:59Amendment to the
11:01Amendment to the
11:03Amendment to the
11:05Amendment to the
11:07Amendment to the
11:09Amendment to the
11:11Amendment to the
11:13Amendment to the
11:15Amendment to the
11:17Amendment to the
11:19Amendment to the
11:21Amendment to the
11:23Amendment to the
11:25Amendment to the
11:27Amendment to the
11:29Amendment to the
11:31Amendment to the
11:33Amendment to the
11:35Amendment to the
11:37Amendment to the
11:39Amendment to the
11:41Amendment to
11:43Amendment to
11:45Amendment to
11:47Amendment to
11:49Amendment to
11:51Amendment to
11:53Amendment to
11:55Amendment to
11:57Amendment to
11:59Amendment to
12:01Amendment to
12:03Amendment to
12:05Amendment to
12:07Amendment to
12:09Amendment to
12:11Amendment to
12:13Amendment to
12:15Amendment to
12:17Amendment to
12:19Amendment to
12:21Amendment to
12:23Amendment to
12:25Amendment to
12:27Amendment to
12:29Amendment to
12:31Amendment to
12:33Amendment to
12:35Amendment to
12:37Amendment to
12:39Amendment to
12:41Amendment to
12:43Amendment to
12:45Amendment to
12:47Amendment to
12:49Amendment to
12:51Amendment to
12:53Amendment to
12:55Amendment to
12:57Amendment to
12:59Amendment to
13:01Amendment to
13:03Amendment to
13:05Amendment to
13:07Amendment to
13:09Amendment to
13:11Amendment to
13:13Amendment to
13:15Amendment to
13:17Amendment to
13:19Amendment to
13:21Amendment to
13:23Amendment to
13:25Amendment to
13:27Amendment to
13:29Amendment to
13:31Amendment to
13:33Election Commission of Pakistan should follow the Supreme Court's decision. Fine.
13:39But Election Commission of Pakistan cannot go beyond the scope of the law.
13:44Both the Speaker of National Assembly and the Speaker of Punjab Assembly are saying that
13:49this law will now take precedence over the Supreme Court's order.
13:53So, everyone is confusing the Election Commission of Pakistan.
13:56I think this is a very unnecessary and against the law.
14:07Because the majority decision has been taken.
14:11You don't have any other option.
14:12The law has changed. What should we do now?
14:15The law has changed. What should we do now?
14:18The law has changed for the future.
14:20From now on, the elections will be in accordance with the existing law.
14:24The elections will be in accordance with the existing law.
14:28If a person is a Muslim and he dies, you cannot make him a Hindu.
14:37No, but we will not allow a revolution here.
14:40If a Pakistani dies, you cannot change his ID card,
14:48cancel his NADRA membership and declare him an alien.
14:52So, you are saying that this should not have been a retrospective decision.
14:55Yes, and one more thing.
14:57It is evident from this that the intention of this government was very bad.
15:01In the darkness of the night, without informing the members,
15:04they were carrying out illegal activities.
15:06Okay, let's talk about the bad things.
15:08The things that are happening in the Constitutional Courts,
15:11it is evident from this that their sole purpose is that
15:16Perry's justice should not get his reserve seats,
15:19Perry's justice should not be declared as a member of the PTI,
15:22there should not be any chance of Perry's justice coming back to the government.
15:27I feel that this is a situation of all is fair in love and war.
15:32We suppose this is not war.
15:36It doesn't look like love either though.
15:40If there is love between PTI and the government, then it is a better kind of love.
15:44We are not here for love.
15:46We are not here for love.
15:48But I am just giving an example.
15:50Mr. Ali Maulana, the question is this.
15:52The people who make the law, the Pakistanis oppress them.
15:54But there is one more thing.
15:56This will have an impact on the Constitutional Amendment.
15:58Mr. Ali Maulana, let's come back to Mr. Bilawal's point.
16:00We will come back to that.
16:02But this will have an impact on the Constitutional Amendment,
16:04and it will have a good impact.
16:06Why did you get 39?
16:0741 was on the other side.
16:08So, what should we do now?
16:10Now what?
16:11If the numbers are not being fulfilled for the Constitutional Amendment,
16:13then it can be done from this side.
16:17Look, the government,
16:19first of all,
16:21before completing the numbers,
16:23has to complete the houses.
16:25Right now,
16:27some other important developments are happening.
16:29I don't want to talk much about that.
16:31What is that?
16:33In the Supreme Court, some developments will come.
16:35God willing, you will see in a day or two.
16:37Look, you...
16:39Mr. Ali Maulana, please put more light on this.
16:41The light is a little less.
16:43I will put more light.
16:45I will tell you.
16:47Look, you should understand what I am telling you.
16:49You cannot do the Constitutional Amendment
16:51if the house is incomplete.
16:53In the country, there are two houses for the Constitutional Amendment.
16:55Are you talking about the KPK?
16:57Look, the Supreme Court of Pakistan
16:59will not accept any such
17:01Constitutional Amendment.
17:03Nor will it become a part of the Constitution.
17:05If you do not complete the house,
17:07the House of Federation is a Senate.
17:09All four branches of the Senate
17:11have equal representation.
17:13You are saying that the KPK...
17:15Senate is incomplete.
17:17National Assembly is incomplete.
17:19There are no reserve seats in the National Assembly.
17:21Minority seats are not complete.
17:23Your house is not complete in the Senate.
17:25If the house is incomplete,
17:27the Constitutional Amendments
17:29will be struck down in a day.
17:31Secondly, you do not have the numbers.
17:33If you want to complete the numbers,
17:35but if you kidnap the people
17:37of the opposing party,
17:39then you are adding another
17:41dark chapter in the history of Pakistan.
17:43I am sorry I am cutting you short.
17:45But it seems like...
17:47Because it is a very strange impression.
17:49It should not be.
17:51But it is.
17:53Everyone has their own
17:55parties in the courts.
17:57This is my part, this is your part.
17:59It has become an impression.
18:01In the KPK,
18:03there is the issue of reserve seats.
18:05In return,
18:07the elections of the Senate
18:09were held in reserve seats.
18:11Was Pakistan pre-empting
18:13Tehreek-e-Insaf?
18:15Was that why
18:17the situation was stopped?
18:19Was that the reason?
18:23Tehreek-e-Insaf
18:25will make every effort
18:27to protect the mandate of the people.
18:29Right now,
18:31the worst democratic
18:33robbery in the history of Pakistan
18:35has taken place.
18:37The mandate of the people of Pakistan
18:39has been stolen.
18:41A very big bill has been passed
18:43against Article 6.
18:45The election has been stolen.
18:47Everyone has done this together.
18:49The bill has not been implemented.
18:51And at this time,
18:53Pakistan has placed those people
18:55who have been thrown out by the people.
18:57The people have rejected them.
18:59If you do this,
19:01you will have to let those people
19:03sit in power.
19:05Otherwise,
19:07democracy will become
19:09the worst form of autocracy.
19:13Ali Muhammad Khan Sahib,
19:15you still don't realize
19:17that the work you want
19:19is not going to be done
19:21to give the seat of power
19:23to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
19:25as a gift.
19:27This is not happening.
19:29What is happening now
19:31is a reality.
19:33Even the number of votes
19:35for the constitutional amendment
19:37is being seen after this.
19:39What should be done now?
19:41Are you saying that the PTI
19:43is being introduced in the Supreme Court
19:45or will the Supreme Court
19:47itself take notice?
19:49I think this will be clear
19:51to you in a day or two.
19:53If you give clarity a day or two
19:55If someone is thinking
19:57of doing a constitutional amendment
19:59in a non-constitutional way,
20:01then you have failed before
20:03and you will fail again.
20:05As far as you are concerned,
20:07we face the reality.
20:09The reality is that
20:11there has been a robbery.
20:13If we have the strength,
20:15we will ask for our rights.
20:17Yes, we will adopt a constitutional
20:19method. We will not take help
20:21from any foreign country.
20:23We will not kidnap our people.
20:25We will not kidnap our women.
20:27We are democratic people.
20:29We will continue our struggle.
20:31And from within this system,
20:33we will show you
20:35how our mandate is taken back.
20:37How our reserved seats
20:39are brought to the assembly.
20:41We will struggle.
20:43We will not back down.
20:45By the grace of Allah,
20:47Allah is with us. The nation is with us.
20:49That is why, despite all the efforts,
20:51despite all the schemes,
20:53they are failing
20:55in every field.
20:57But what is the most shameful thing?
20:59The most shameful thing is
21:01that those people
21:03who are making the constitution,
21:05who are going to get it passed
21:07by those people,
21:09they did not know.
21:11The Prime Minister did not know.
21:13And the most shameful thing is
21:15that the leader of the
21:17so-called constitution-making
21:19party is trying to destroy
21:21the fundamental rights of the constitution
21:23made by his grandfather.
21:25Tell us about the article 8.
21:27He removed the article 8.
21:29He clarified it today.
21:31No, he did not do it today.
21:33He clarified it on the same day.
21:35What happened that night?
21:37Why did his members not know?
21:39Tell me about a member
21:41of the People's Party
21:43who had a draft that night.
21:45The night he started voting.
21:47Tell me,
21:49on the 21st,
21:51there will be a Jalsa.
21:53Is the preparation for the Jalsa complete?
21:55It is always complete.
21:57What type of Jalsa
21:59will it be?
22:01Will it be like the one
22:03that took place in Islamabad
22:05or will it be different?
22:07It will be a great Jalsa.
22:09Why will it be different?
22:11A lot has been said about
22:13the Jalsa in Islamabad.
22:15The Jalsa was peaceful.
22:17There was no firecrackers.
22:19Did the government leave the Jalsa?
22:21Did the government leave the Jalsa?
22:23Tell me, what was the need
22:25to be afraid of the government?
22:27The Jalsa was peaceful.
22:29The government did not leave the Jalsa.
22:31There was no issue of security.
22:33Even today, the government
22:35is sitting there.
22:37I do not understand,
22:39if the Jalsa takes place in Lahore,
22:41will the throne of Lahore fall?
22:43Your purpose is not to make
22:45the throne of Lahore fall.
22:47That is what you are saying.
22:49We will hold our Jalsa.
22:51But the purpose is not to make
22:53the throne of Lahore fall.
22:55Thank you very much for joining me
22:57in the program.
22:59Mr. Kamran Murtaza is also
23:01with us.
23:03Mr. Kamran Murtaza,
23:05Bilawal Bhutto Zardari
23:07said something very important
23:09about you today.
23:11Mr. Bilawal said,
23:13yes, it is a compulsion.
23:15He said, there was no compulsion.
23:17There was no fear.
23:19Before you came here,
23:21he had already released Article 8.
23:23Will you clarify, Mr. Kamran Murtaza?
23:25He is not correct.
23:27I am standing on my point.
23:29My point is correct.
23:31He insisted on this.
23:33He said it is a compulsion.
23:35He said it is a compulsion.
23:37He said it is a compulsion.
23:39He said it is a compulsion.
23:41He said it is a compulsion.
23:43He said it is a compulsion.
23:45His gesture or words
23:47means it is a compulsion.
23:49Did he say it is a compulsion
23:51directly or by gesture?
23:53Yes, he was having
23:55a direct conversation with me.
23:57So, Pakistan People's Party
23:59wanted to change the law
24:01according to compulsion
24:03in such a way
24:05that it is
24:07against the spirit of the law.
24:09Yes, it is like that.
24:11I had insisted
24:13not to do this.
24:15This is destruction.
24:17And
24:19I don't like
24:21this at all.
24:23Mr. Kamran, he said
24:25before you came here,
24:27he had already released Article 8.
24:29He is not correct.
24:31The next day,
24:33when there was a special committee meeting,
24:35during the meeting,
24:37he said
24:39that he had removed it.
24:41We met
24:43a night before.
24:45a night before.
24:47Around 3 o'clock.
24:49He came to convince Maulana.
24:51After that, I met him
24:53at 2 o'clock.
24:55The next day.
24:57He did not say this.
24:59I insisted
25:01that it should be removed.
25:03He did not say
25:05how to vote on it.
25:07We will not be able to face people.
25:09Even then, he did not say.
25:11At least 10 hours passed.
25:13Even then, he did not inform.
25:15During the committee meeting,
25:17there will be a recording of it.
25:19During the committee meeting,
25:21there will be a recording of
25:23what I said and what he said.
25:25Remove it and make it public.
25:27At that time, he said for the first time.
25:29The date will also be known.
25:31Very interesting.
25:33Mr. Kamran, he complained to you.
25:35He said that you are coming on TV programs.
25:37But Mr. Murtaza Wahab is calling you.
25:39If you had picked up the call,
25:41everything would have been clear.
25:43Are you really not picking up Mr. Murtaza Wahab's call?
25:45No, it is not like that.
25:47I am sorry for that.
25:49I was driving the car.
25:51I was going to the office.
25:53I could not pick it up.
25:55When I went to the office,
25:57there was a crowd of clients.
25:59When the TV program started,
26:01it was late at night.
26:03He did not call me again.
26:05I did not find it appropriate
26:07to trouble him again.
26:09I am ready to call him
26:11ten times.
26:13Murtaza is my younger brother.
26:15But the factual position is
26:17what I am saying.
26:19By the way, Mr. Murtaza Wahab
26:21is available on the phone.
26:23I can tell you this myself.
26:25Will you contact Mr. Murtaza Wahab
26:27if he calls you again?
26:29I will call him.
26:31I do not have any problem.
26:33I will receive his call.
26:35It will be more appropriate.
26:37He is showing his anger
26:39and showing that I am right.
26:41He also said that
26:43you asked for two days.
26:45Two days are about to end.
26:47What will you do now?
26:49No, this is wrong.
26:51It is not like that.
26:53When he came the next day,
26:55he asked me and JUI
26:57to come together
26:59and make a draft
27:01of a new deal.
27:03I told him
27:05to make his own deal.
27:07We will make our own deal.
27:09You can share it with me.
27:11In return, I will share it with you.
27:13There was no deal from them.
27:15This is the factual position.
27:17So, the delay is not from you.
27:19It is from the People's Party.
27:21Yes, it is from the People's Party.
27:23We do not have a problem.
27:25We do not have to make an amendment.
27:27We are people sitting in the Treasury.
27:29The people sitting in the Treasury
27:31or indirectly
27:33have to make an amendment.
27:35You do not have to make an amendment.
27:37The Treasury and the Opposition
27:39have to make an amendment.
27:41It is up to you
27:43whether you want to make an amendment
27:45or not.
27:47Maybe that is why
27:49they are waiting for you
27:51to make an amendment.
27:53Are you ready to make an amendment?
27:55Why should I make an amendment?
27:57We do not have a problem.
27:59When they make an amendment,
28:01I will give them a counter.
28:03It should not be like this.
28:05It should be like this.
28:07We will make an amendment
28:09and then they can say
28:11that they themselves said
28:13that this is an amendment.
28:15I just want to confirm,
28:17you did not make an amendment.
28:19You will correct the people's party
28:21or the government
28:23when they make an amendment.
28:25Am I correct?
28:27No, it is not about correction.
28:29I will make an amendment
28:31when they make an amendment.
28:33I will make an amendment
28:35because the Treasury
28:37has to make an amendment
28:39for the Government Bill.
28:41Why should I make an amendment
28:43for the Government Bill?
28:45They will make an amendment
28:47and I will give them my version.
28:49I will make an amendment
28:51that it should not be like this.
28:53But in that case,
28:55they will share it with me.
28:57I told Murtaza to WhatsApp me
28:59on that day.
29:01I think it was on Sunday
29:03or Monday
29:05when Bilawal and Murtaza came.
29:07There were Khushisa
29:09and Naveed Qamar.
29:11They have not sent me
29:13any document yet.
29:15They said that they will
29:17WhatsApp me.
29:19They also said that
29:21some documents are with Farooq Naik.
29:23He is in Karachi.
29:25They have not sent me
29:27the documents yet.
29:29Very interesting.
29:31Thank you very much
29:33for this clarification.
29:35We will discuss some legal matters
29:37after the break.
29:39This was very important
29:41what Kamran Murtaza is saying.
29:43He is wrong
29:45and Kamran Murtaza
29:47is right.
29:49See you after the break.
30:13...
30:15...
30:17...
30:19...
30:21...
30:23...
30:25...
30:27...
30:29...
30:31...
30:33...
30:35...
30:37...
30:39...
30:41...
30:43...
30:45...
30:47...
30:49...
30:51...
30:53...
30:55...
30:57...
30:59...
31:01...
31:03...
31:05...
31:07...
31:09...
31:11...
31:13...
31:15...
31:17...
31:19...
31:21...
31:23...
31:25...
31:27...
31:29...
31:31...
31:33...
31:35...
31:37...
31:39...
31:41...
31:43...
31:45...
31:47...
31:49...
31:51...
31:53...
31:55...
31:57...
31:59...
32:01...
32:03...
32:05...
32:07...
32:09...
32:11...
32:13...
32:15...
32:17...
32:19...
32:21...
32:23...
32:25...
32:27...
32:29...
32:31...
32:33...
32:35...
32:37...
32:39...
32:41...
32:43...
32:45...
32:47...
32:49...
32:51...
32:53...
32:55...
32:57...
32:59...
33:01...
33:03...
33:05...
33:07...
33:09...
33:11...
33:13...
33:15...
33:17...
33:19...
33:21...
33:23...
33:25...
33:27...
33:29...
33:31...
33:33...
33:35...
33:37...
33:39...
33:41...
33:43...
33:45...
33:47...
33:49...
33:51...
33:53...
33:55...
33:57...
33:59...
34:01...
34:03...
34:05...
34:07...
34:09...
34:11...
34:13...
34:15...
34:17...
34:19...
34:21...
34:23...
34:25...
34:27...
34:29...
34:31...
34:33...
34:35...
34:37...
34:39...
34:41...
34:43...
34:45...
34:47...
34:49...
34:51...
34:53...
34:55...
34:57...
34:59...
35:01...
35:03...
35:05...
35:07...
35:09...
35:11...
35:13...
35:15...
35:17...
35:19...
35:21...
35:23...
35:25...
35:27...
35:29...
35:31...
35:33...
35:35...
35:37...
35:39...
35:41...
35:43...
35:45...
35:47...
35:49So the decision is a detailed judgment, it should be given, it should not be ignored.
35:56Mr. Jadun, now the question arises, what options does the ECP have?
36:01The ECP has one option, that the decision of the Supreme Court, whatever comes,
36:05should be implemented and noticed according to that.
36:08They haven't done that yet, there is no delay.
36:10Secondly, the law that has been passed by the Parliament,
36:15has brought an amendment, has brought a retrospective,
36:18that is, there will be a report on the past as well, from 2017.
36:21By implementing that, the number game should be changed,
36:25and all should not be put in the bag of PTI.
36:28SIC should remain SIC, PTI should not be made.
36:30In your opinion, for the ECP, legally,
36:34what will be more aligned with the law and legality?
36:38Look, the ECP has given a judgment to the Supreme Court,
36:42there was a full court, 13 members of that bench were present,
36:45two disagreed, 11 judgment chief justices themselves,
36:49they are saying that PTI has fought as a party election,
36:52and these seats are theirs.
36:54So why is the ECP interpreting itself in this?
36:56I don't understand.
36:57It should implement the judgment straight away,
36:59but the ECP is not working as a constitutional institution.
37:03The ECP is biased.
37:05See, this is the reason.
37:07The government says the same about some other institution, it is biased.
37:09No, the government may or may not say it,
37:12but it is biased because,
37:14if you want to delay a party,
37:19sometimes it wants to delay it,
37:21so the foreign funding case delays for 7 years,
37:23sometimes it wants to delay it, so it works in minutes.
37:25Use your discretion as per law.
37:29Look, the Supreme Court has asked for an explanation,
37:32they have explained it,
37:33they have said that these 41 people,
37:35from whom they have given the declaration,
37:37you should notify them,
37:38that they are from PTI,
37:39now they are sitting on it again,
37:40now the detailed judgment has come.
37:42This means that the ECP is not doing it on its own,
37:44there is a force behind it.
37:46Why are you undermining the ECP so much?
37:48It is a party institution.
37:49I am not undermining it.
37:50Why is it necessary to have a force behind it?
37:51Why can't it do it on its own?
37:52Look, the ECP is the trustee of the people.
37:54The ECP is such an institution of the whole of Pakistan,
37:57which is a separate institution,
37:58which is used to conduct elections.
37:59It is the worst in the ECP.
38:01Sometimes the RTS sits in 2018,
38:03sometimes all the petitions come.
38:06In today's time,
38:07the litigation that is delayed in the High Court,
38:09the Supreme Court,
38:10is the case of the Election Commission.
38:12Now they say that the Supreme Court,
38:13and other courts do not decide.
38:15The most difficult thing is that the Election Commission,
38:17today I am telling you that
38:18the people who have petitioned on 8th February,
38:20the judgment of the Election Commission has not come yet.
38:22The Election Commission is busy.
38:23They are sitting and waiting.
38:24It is busy.
38:25No, it is not busy.
38:26On a lighter note.
38:28On a lighter note.
38:29Mr. Parshad,
38:30the Ayin has been done,
38:31the Noam's nose has been done,
38:33it can be done anywhere,
38:34so if someone says to follow the Ayin,
38:36then today the Ayin is different,
38:37tomorrow the Ayin will be different.
38:39The amendment comes.
38:40This is the right of the Parliament to do the amendment.
38:42Now to amend,
38:44someone should bring a law,
38:45and by making a law,
38:46amend it,
38:47and change the number game.
38:48This is the vicious circle.
38:50In this, where should the ECP stand?
38:52Look,
38:54the Ayin is a living document.
38:58And in this,
39:00the amendment is the right of the Parliament.
39:03The amendment can be done.
39:05Nothing can be kept at one place.
39:09It is an evolution process.
39:11With time, changes come.
39:13Now the question is,
39:15the amendments that are coming,
39:19how can they be implemented,
39:21or how can they be looked at?
39:23Look, in this,
39:25if we look at everything,
39:28one by one,
39:29and we have done some exercise today,
39:32there are some very good things,
39:35and some very objectionable things.
39:38So you cannot brush aside some very good things,
39:42and say,
39:43this government is doing something very wrong,
39:46and is doing something very good.
39:49And look,
39:50some amendment proposals are such,
39:52which are based on the demands of the Bar Councils and Bar Associates.
39:57I agree with that.
39:58I agree.
39:59I would like, Mr. Pasha,
40:00to bring forward the bad and good sides of the government.
40:04Since we are going beyond the limits of the amendment,
40:08can you clarify what you have in front of you,
40:11and what is acceptable to you,
40:13and what is not acceptable to you?
40:15Look, yesterday,
40:17there was an All-Pakistan Lawyers' Representative Convention,
40:25in which the Law Minister was in the hot seat.
40:28And for four and a half to five hours,
40:30he faced every question,
40:32and gave an answer.
40:34He was satisfied with some,
40:36and not satisfied with others.
40:38But the most beautiful thing in this amendment,
40:42is Article 185,
40:44subclass 4,
40:45which has two provisions.
40:48One of which is,
40:49that if this amendment is passed,
40:51then immediately after that,
40:53that is,
40:54after the implementation of this amendment,
40:56if a criminal appeal is filed,
40:59then the Supreme Court of Pakistan
41:01is bound to decide on it within 12 months.
41:04And the second provision is,
41:06that the criminal appeals that have already been filed
41:10in the Supreme Court of Pakistan,
41:13then the Supreme Court of Pakistan
41:15is bound to decide on them within 24 months.
41:19This was the demand of our lawyers,
41:22and the people of Pakistan,
41:24that the cases should not be fixed.
41:28In life imprisonment,
41:30when cases are filed,
41:31then the accused comes home after being punished.
41:35So all these things,
41:36this is a positive point,
41:37don't look at it from a political point of view.
41:40If he comes home after being punished,
41:41then that will also be a boon.
41:43A lot of people die there.
41:45Look, it becomes infectious.
41:48You see, the death sentence cases,
41:50the people who are in prison,
41:52they are in the death cell.
41:54They cannot be spent there for a day.
41:56And they have been locked up there for decades.
41:59Then, one thing on which we objected,
42:02that is,
42:03that the Sunstead Clause was given,
42:07that the Chief Justice's appointment will be first,
42:14that the Speaker will form a committee of 8 National Assembly Members,
42:20and then he will propose,
42:22which the Prime Minister will propose,
42:24and the President of Pakistan.
42:26We objected to this.
42:27We said that this should not happen.
42:29And today, when we are making our proposal,
42:33that this is our proposal,
42:38then we are keeping these things in it.
42:40Look, there should be deliberation.
42:42This is just a working paper.
42:44Because there should be deliberation,
42:45I will also ask Mr. Jadoon to participate on this side.
42:47Let's ask you, Mr. Jadoon.
42:50There, the thing on which he is agreeable or not agreeable,
42:54because in Vukla too,
42:56everywhere there is a fact that there has been polarization.
42:59There are two sides in the government too.
43:01Unfortunately, there are two sides in the judiciary too.
43:04There are two sides in the public too.
43:05There are two sides in Vukla too.
43:06So, does one segment of Vukla accept,
43:09does the other segment of Vukla accept or not?
43:11Mr. Jadoon.
43:12Look, the other group,
43:14they have made a convention in Lahore today,
43:16that is,
43:17let's see,
43:19like they said,
43:20our first objection was that
43:22the constitution is a social contract
43:25between the people of Pakistan and the state.
43:27So, people should know
43:29what changes are happening in the constitution.
43:31And the people who say,
43:32in the darkness of the night,
43:33this is absolutely right.
43:34At that time,
43:35if the numbers were fulfilled that night,
43:36then the amendment should have been passed.
43:38This is a very big injustice.
43:40Why are they doing this debate now?
43:43Is it getting better now?
43:44No.
43:45It should have been better earlier.
43:46I agree.
43:47This should have been discussed earlier.
43:48There should have been a consultation with the stakeholders.
43:50The amendment is the right of the parliament.
43:52There are no two opinions on this.
43:53Who says it is not the right of the parliament?
43:55But there is a limitation in the amendment.
43:57It is not the absolute right of the parliament.
43:59It makes sense.
44:00The parliament,
44:01even if they put the stake in the KP,
44:03they cannot do it
44:04until the KP assembly approves it.
44:06The parliament,
44:07the three basic features,
44:09for example,
44:10the interpretation of the constitution,
44:11which has been developed till date,
44:13and the constitution itself says,
44:14first,
44:15no law can be passed against the fundamental right.
44:17Second,
44:18no law can be passed
44:19by putting the stake in the freedom of judiciary.
44:22Third,
44:23the Islamic Prohibition,
44:24chapter 9 of the constitution,
44:25article 227,
44:26no law can be passed against it.
44:28The parliament has the right to do so.
44:31But,
44:32is there any way to make this a constitutional court,
44:34by putting the stake in the Supreme Court?
44:36Look,
44:37the timing of this is irrelevant.
44:39The timing is bad.
44:40The reason for this is,
44:41if they say,
44:42it was in COD.
44:43COD came in 2006.
44:44And now,
44:45after 18 years,
44:46they are suddenly reminded.
44:47Is it right to give it?
44:48Is it right to give it?
44:49You can do it after two months.
44:50The Supreme Court can sit and…
44:52Is it person-specific now?
44:53No,
44:54it should be person-specific.
44:55In COD,
44:56it is only written that
44:57the Supreme Court will establish it
44:58after 24 years.
44:59In COD,
45:00the most important article is
45:01class 22.
45:03Right.
45:04No government
45:05will ask for support
45:06from the army
45:07in its government formation.
45:08Today,
45:09tell me,
45:10which government,
45:11which party,
45:12asks for support from the army?
45:13This is a very long debate.
45:14Tell me one thing.
45:15This is a very long debate.
45:16From which community can we ask?
45:17COD is a very good document.
45:18But,
45:19you have acted on all its doubts.
45:20On whom did you act?
45:21How many percent did you act?
45:22You are doing it on one person.
45:23Don't let them do it on one person.
45:24Absolutely,
45:25the parliament has the right
45:26to make a court as well.
45:27Right.
45:28But,
45:29by making one court,
45:30if you undermine the other,
45:31then that court
45:32will also step on the judiciary.
45:33You are not undermining anyone.
45:34Right.
45:35Now,
45:36you will take the Supreme Court
45:37to the district court level
45:38and you want to make
45:39such a court
45:40which is supreme
45:41and its judge
45:42is 68%
45:43Let's see what we do.
45:44Now,
45:45we have come to the debate.
45:46We have come to the debate.
45:47We have come forcibly,
45:48but we have come.
45:49Now,
45:50we have come to you as well.
45:51But,
45:52I say,
45:53if you make a court as well,
45:54then you will undermine
45:55the other court.
45:56That is also fine.
45:57Mr. Pasha,
45:58thank you very much
45:59for joining me in the program.
46:00The time for the segment is over.
46:01After this,
46:02we will talk about
46:03the facts.
46:04First,
46:05we will talk about
46:06the software.
46:07Now,
46:08it will be different.
46:09After the break.
46:15Welcome back
46:16after the break.
46:17Viewers,
46:18a very big development
46:19took place.
46:20A development
46:21which was awaited.
46:22And,
46:23United Nations
46:24raised its voice
46:25with applause.
46:26At the time,
46:27United Nations
46:28passed a resolution.
46:29It called for
46:30that Israel
46:31within a year
46:32end the
46:33illegal
46:34occupation
46:35of Palestine.
46:36Israel
46:37is a country
46:38which
46:39is not only
46:40spreading its tentacles
46:41in Palestine
46:42but also
46:43in the whole region.
46:44It has recently
46:45globally
46:46carried out
46:47a terrorism
46:48act.
46:49And,
46:50what is that
46:51terrorism act?
46:52It is very easy to understand.
46:53Western countries
46:54will say
46:55defense,
46:56right to defense
46:57but
46:58it is not
46:59right to defense
47:00in any way.
47:01It is not
47:02right to
47:03defend
47:04in any way.
47:05It is not
47:06right to
47:07defend
47:08in any way.
47:09It is not
47:10right to
47:11defend
47:12in any way.
47:13It is not
47:14right to
47:15defend
47:16in any way.
47:17It is not
47:18right to
47:19defend
47:20in any way.
47:21It is not
47:22right to
47:23defend
47:24in any way.
47:25It is not
47:26right to
47:27defend
47:28in any way.
47:29It is not
47:30right to
47:31defend
47:32in any way.
47:33It is not
47:34right to
47:35defend
47:36in any way.
47:37It is not
47:38right to
47:39defend
47:40in any way.
47:41It is not
47:42right to
47:43defend
47:44in any way.
47:45It is not
47:46right to
47:47defend
47:48in any way.
47:49It is not
47:50right to
47:51defend
47:52in any way.
47:53It is not
47:54right to
47:55defend
47:56in any way.
47:57It is not
47:58right to
47:59defend
48:00in any way.
48:01It is
48:02not
48:03right to
48:04defend
48:05in any
48:06way.
48:07It is
48:08not
48:09right to
48:10defend
48:11in any
48:12way.
48:13It is
48:14not
48:15right to
48:16defend
48:17in any
48:18way.
48:19It is
48:20not
48:21right to
48:22defend
48:23in any
48:24way.
48:25It is
48:26not
48:27right to
48:28defend
48:29in any
48:30way.
48:31It is
48:32not
48:33right to
48:34defend
48:35in any
48:36way.
48:37It is
48:38not
48:39right to
48:40defend
48:41in any
48:42way.
48:43It is
48:44not
48:45right to
48:46defend
48:47in any
48:48way.
48:49It is
48:50not
48:51right to
48:52defend
48:53in any
48:54way.
48:55It is
48:56not
48:57right
48:58to
48:59defend
49:00in any
49:01way.
49:02It
49:03is
49:04not
49:05right to
49:06defend
49:07in any
49:08way.
49:09It is
49:10not
49:11right to
49:12defend
49:13in any
49:14way.
49:15It is
49:16not
49:17right to
49:18defend
49:19in any
49:20way.
49:21It is
49:22not
49:23right to
49:24defend
49:25in any

Recommended