Alberto Fernández "me quería convencer de que mi hija estaba loca", dijo la mamá de Fabiola Yáñez ante la Justicia.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Very well, Irina, news on the cause for gender violence
00:04to the former president Alberto Fernández.
00:06Miriam Verónica Yáñez-Verdugo declared,
00:09who is the mother of Fabiola Yáñez,
00:11and told, pointed out that she saw in person
00:16situations of physical violence of Alberto Fernández
00:19about his daughter.
00:21He spoke, for example, of a situation
00:24in which he pushed her being pregnant for eight months.
00:26He described a shocking scene where he says he fell
00:30with all the weight of Fabiola's belly to the floor
00:33in that circumstance.
00:36He complained a little because he said he did not see
00:39registered all the facts that she had seen
00:42and that they read him in the audience.
00:45He also spoke of an extensive audience, more than five hours.
00:48Yes, almost six hours.
00:50And another of them was, she told that they were there
00:55in the Quinta de Olivos and she saw Fabiola with all the fingers
00:58of Alberto marked on her face, after receiving a slap.
01:03She was staying at the guest house.
01:05Of course.
01:06When she returned from the main house of Olivos,
01:10he had seen her face marked with fingers.
01:13That's what this woman said.
01:16She credited physical violence.
01:17Yes, she credited it.
01:18He also said he saw her with his own eyes.
01:20This is a key to the statement.
01:25He described many situations of threats, of insults,
01:30of discussions, of prohibitions throughout the relationship
01:36they had.
01:36He also told, for example, that when Fabiola interrupted
01:41the pregnancy in 2016, that Fabiola did not want
01:45and that he sent him the money to have the abortion through
01:48Daniel Rodriguez, who was later the manager of the Quinta
01:53Presidencial de Olivos.
01:54Yes, exactly.
01:56That this was a situation of severe suffering,
01:58that later he denied having sent that money for that
02:02practice to be done.
02:03But, well, this woman declared under oath that she had been
02:08like that.
02:08Other issues that she told is that she did not have any
02:14specific act of violence before 12 o'clock at night,
02:18which was when there were employees in the Quinta de
02:21Olivos who could witness it.
02:23Of course, witness.
02:24Of course, that they were able to witness the situation.
02:26But what she did insist is that she heard more than once the
02:31screams of the discussions and, well,
02:34and those two cases that she told you.
02:37Yes.
02:38Well, it's just that it doesn't stop calling my attention.
02:41It seems like a competition to contribute talks,
02:45images, conversations.
02:48It's as if every contribution they make,
02:51the two parties, Alberto Fernández and Fabiola Yañez,
02:55it's as if they wanted to have more weight than what the other
02:58presented immediately before.
03:00It's a war.
03:01It's an open war.
03:02With a very, very strong level of degradation.
03:05Very strong.
03:05And also with the use of the dissemination through the
03:09media, obviously each of those who consider that it will be
03:14better installed in the judicial cause.
03:17That you saw that, well, there is a moment in which it is also
03:20speculated with the effect that the media may have on
03:23the investigation, right?
03:24This usually happens.
03:26Well, here is an open and declared war with a judge who
03:30also bothers Alberto Fernández, Julián Ercolini,
03:33because, as we have already told you more than once,
03:36they don't get along very well.
03:37A very, very, very deep corner.
03:38Yes, there is a corner.
03:39New photos were also known, new photos of Fabiola Yañez
03:44with the eye, with a hematoma, with a bruise.
03:49That sequence that Fabiola Yañez says, they had had a
03:51very strong discussion and Alberto Fernández solved it
03:54with a blowjob.
03:55Alberto Fernández's defense says it was an accidental blow
03:59and that this is how it had been recognized.
04:01Well, do you remember the intervention of the head of the
04:04medical unit of the presidency, also giving his opinion on this
04:08topic?
04:09You know that on the subject of, precisely of the doctor of the
04:12presidential unit of Saavedra, what Fabiola's mother says is
04:16that Saavedra, and this caught my attention, that Saavedra knew
04:19perfectly well what was happening, as a result of what
04:22the blows were.
04:23In other words, there is a contradictory testimony.
04:25Yes.
04:26Fabiola Yañez's mother says that Saavedra knew what the origin
04:29of those, of those blows was.
04:32There are also conversations, Alberto Fernández's defense
04:34specifically points out, there are even some chats that
04:37Alberto Fernández's defense offers with Fabiola Yañez's mother
04:41that Fabiola Yañez had alcohol problems, alcohol addiction,
04:46and that the blows were produced, indeed, when she lost
04:49the balance, eventually, with that issue.
04:50I think there are some, some conversations with Fabiola Yañez's
04:56mother, telling her, well, give me a hand, let's do something,
05:02give me a hand to try to control, effectively, that
05:05problem of addiction with alcohol that Fabiola Yañez has.
05:08Well, I insist.
05:09Alberto, excuse me, has been offering several other witnesses
05:12who first declare in a testimony, descriptions in this sense,
05:18in which you just said, if she fell, then the blows are the
05:21product of the falls because, because she had drunk too much,
05:25or because of her mood, or whatever.
05:29There is particularly, well, some concern about what a woman
05:37who is known as witness B, who has not yet been mentioned,
05:40who says this, that you are talking about.
05:43People close to Fabiola Yañez.
05:45Yes, no, no, but in this case they are Alberto Fernández,
05:48more than anything, right?
05:50The next mentioned are even, for example, the two mothers of
05:53Llaves, but this witness B is someone, is a person who
05:56contributes to Alberto Fernández, who has not yet been mentioned,
05:58who declared it was in a testimony, but who also
06:02made a transcendence in this war that we are counting on.
06:05Well, where he describes her as in a state of almost permanent
06:09drunkenness, Fabiola's mother, what she said is that he
06:12turned her into a human debauchery with the treatment he had.
06:15That's very strong, right?
06:16Because we are talking about, as a witness, physical violence,
06:19but also verbal violence, psychological violence,
06:22emotional violence.
06:24Thank you, Irina.
06:25Hernán, two notes on the country tax and collection?
06:29Let's see, these days, since September 1st, we have been
06:32discussing here that the country tax was reduced, but the country tax
06:36also applies, for example, to card payments.
06:40Now, nothing happened there, nothing was reduced, but a very
06:44important asterisk, what happens at the end of December?
06:48The country tax is over, the five-year anniversary is over,
06:52there is no more country tax, there is no longer your aunt,
06:56there will be no country tax, for those who care.
06:59Of course, you can't discriminate.
07:01It is the one who suddenly pays with the card.
07:04And here a range of discussions opens up for the government.
07:08Today you pay $ 9.80 plus 30 from the country tax,
07:12plus 30 in advance of earnings.
07:14That gives approximately $ 1,570.
07:17If I take out the country tax, it gives me $ 1,280.
07:20I could lower the card dollar to $ 1,280.
07:24Well, the government could also say,
07:27I raise the advance of earnings.
07:29That would be quite contradictory to government policy.
07:32To avoid the loss of dollars, let's say.
07:34The drainage of dollars.
07:35There you have two problems.
07:36First, the persuasion that you are not going to buy so many dollars.
07:39Of course.
07:40Because if you don't, they are almost inviting you to go out
07:43and pay with a card, or from here you buy with Amazon, I don't know.
07:46Yes.
07:47The other is that it loses tax recovery.
07:49Well, the advance of earnings could be the times of,
07:52then they give it back to you, they supposedly give it back to you
07:55when the jury's statement is won, if you won a year, let's suppose.
07:58This is analysis, intuition, this is data.
08:00No, no, it's what's going to happen.
08:01Ah.
08:02What I don't know is what the government is going to do,
08:04finally, regarding this decision.
08:05Yes.
08:06That at the end of the year the country tax is over is a reality.
08:09Yes, yes, yes, I was referring to the advance of earnings.
08:11Of course.
08:12Maybe someone is thinking, oh, in January I'm going to Brazil.
08:15Well, maybe today you can't buy without a country tax.
08:17Of course.
08:18If you speculate with that, you have to see what happens in January.
08:20You have to wait to get there.
08:21Of course.
08:22And you have to see what the government does.
08:23If the government thinks about doubling the retail of earnings,
08:26why can it do that?
08:27In reality, it is not putting a new tax.
08:29The government cannot do that.
08:31Well, it has to ask for authorization from Congress.
08:33But it can increase your retention.
08:36Let's see what it finally decides and what happens with that dollar card.