#imrankhan #bushrabibi #190millionpoundcase #alqadirtrustcase #islamabadcourt #supremecourt #pti #pticorecommittee #pmlngovt #salmanakramraja #aitrazhai #aniqanisar
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Aniqa Nisar
Guests:
- Salman Akram Raja PTI
- Khurram Dastgir Khan PMLN
"State lost nothing, and Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Gained Nothing..." Salman Akram Raja's Analysis
"Har Moqay Par Sarak Par Nahi Aya Jata..." Salman Akram Raja's Statement
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
(Current Affairs)
Host:
- Aniqa Nisar
Guests:
- Salman Akram Raja PTI
- Khurram Dastgir Khan PMLN
"State lost nothing, and Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Gained Nothing..." Salman Akram Raja's Analysis
"Har Moqay Par Sarak Par Nahi Aya Jata..." Salman Akram Raja's Statement
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
00:09This is a program with objections.
00:10I am Huani Khanisar.
00:11Viewers, the biggest problem in the world at this time is how to stop white-collar crime.
00:16White-collar crime is done in such a complex way that after that it is not clear where the
00:22crime started and where it ended.
00:24In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
00:54This is a big fraud.
00:55Listen.
01:24In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
01:54In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:01In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:08In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:13In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:18In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:23In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:28In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:33In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:38In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:43In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:48In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:52In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
02:57In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:02In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:07In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:12In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:17In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:22In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:27In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:32In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:37In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:42In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:47In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:52In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
03:57In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
04:02In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.
04:07Salman Akram Raj is with us.
04:12He is the Secretary General of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.
04:17Salman Akram Raj, you have joined us.
04:22Salman, you have given 48 hours to appeal the £190 million case.
04:27Should we assume that the appeal will be filed tomorrow?
04:32Yes, it will be filed tomorrow.
04:37We will request the appeal to be postponed.
04:42This will not take long.
04:47The postponement will be heard soon.
04:52It will be decided in the next few weeks.
04:57It is clear that this decision is against the law.
05:02It is against the facts.
05:07It cannot be appealed in any way.
05:12The results of the cases that have been filed do not reflect the facts.
05:17A loss of money does not prove the state.
05:22The money that came into the Supreme Court's account
05:27was due to an agreement between the Malik Riaz family and the British National Crime Agency.
05:32There is no role of the government in this.
05:37This money has never been called the money of the Pakistani government in the UK.
05:42They thought it was the money of the Malik Riaz family in the UK.
05:47They thought it was the money of the Pakistani government in the UK.
05:52It is not the money of the Pakistani government.
05:57The government has not come to this.
06:02The government has not come to this.
06:07The government has not come to this.
06:12When the money arrives to the public,
06:17its balance is stopped and due to that,
06:22it has returned to the government,
06:27is this considered a crime?
06:32It has never happened.
06:37No, that didn't happen.
06:39The money went there and they frozen that money because a decision was made about Malir's land in Pakistan.
06:47They said that since the Pakistan Supreme Court has given a decision regarding your role,
06:54we will investigate your case and see if the money that came to the UK has anything to do with the case in Pakistan.
07:03They didn't accuse Malik Riaz family of any crime that has happened in the UK or anywhere else.
07:11That was supposed to be the next step, Salman Akhund Raja.
07:13That was supposed to be the next step.
07:15No, it wasn't.
07:17No, it wasn't. Listen to me. It's not like that.
07:19They just said that we are cancelling your visa and we want you to leave this country and take your property.
07:28They gave them the option to defreeze the money and put it back in the same account where you have to pay for Malir's land.
07:38That is the Supreme Court's account which is their mutual agreement with Malik Riaz family and National Crime Agency.
07:44They wrote this in that.
07:46And they said that we will not have any shareholder with this money.
07:49You can take it. We don't see any crime in the UK.
07:53Why should we spend more time on this?
07:55But if you don't take it back like this, then we will see. We will investigate.
08:01But we don't need it if you take this money back and put it in the Supreme Court's account.
08:06And that's what happened.
08:08And by putting it in the Supreme Court's account, the money that was their responsibility was not paid.
08:14The Supreme Court then had to decide whether this money should be given to Malir Development Authority or not.
08:20This was the second step.
08:22This was the reward given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
08:24And whatever happened in the UK, let me complete.
08:29The Supreme Court decided that we are not giving this money to Malir Development Authority.
08:34On 9th January 2024, under the Supreme Court's decision on 21st November 2023,
08:4094 billion rupees were given to the State of Pakistan and Sindh Government.
08:44So, there is no role of the Cabinet or the Government or Mr. Imran Khan in this.
08:50Only a confidentiality deed was signed by Shahzad Akbar on 6th November.
08:54That has also come to light now.
08:56There is nothing in it except that we will not sign your mutual agreement with the Malik Riaz family.
09:02Except that we need the law to present this agreement.
09:06There is nothing in that deed.
09:08Mr. Saman Akhbar, it is wrong not to sign that.
09:10Listen to me.
09:12Has our Cabinet gone so far that it should not be shown?
09:18Confidentiality deed is for public.
09:20For the Cabinet?
09:22The Cabinet has to take decisions.
09:24So, the Cabinet should also have a confidentiality deed in front of them.
09:28This is not a case of Mr. Imran Khan.
09:32This is my question.
09:34One minute.
09:36You are talking about something else.
09:38Right now, we are deciding whether there was any corruption.
09:40The Cabinet was told that there is a confidentiality deed.
09:42It is a two-page deed.
09:44There is nothing in it.
09:46In the summary, it was written that there is nothing in it.
09:48Nothing was hidden from the Cabinet.
09:50It is wrong. Read the summary.
09:52In the summary, all the articles of the confidentiality agreement were written.
09:56It is only that this deed will not be presented.
09:58This is their mutual agreement.
10:00The Malik Riaz family and the NCA.
10:02Except that there is a legal need for it.
10:04Then it will be presented.
10:06So, there is nothing else.
10:08You are saying that we want to decide whether there was a crime or not.
10:12I don't want to do that.
10:14I don't want to do that.
10:16I don't want to do that.
10:18Obviously, if you go to the appeal, then it will be decided further.
10:20But Mr. Salman Akram, my question at this time is that you are saying this.
10:24But at that time, the sitting members of the Cabinet,
10:26who still have a lot of affection with the PTI,
10:30they also kept saying this.
10:32But at this time,
10:34what is being found the most is that
10:36after this matter,
10:38there has been a punishment.
10:4014 years of punishment is not a small punishment.
10:42After this, how did Pakistan not go towards the movement of justice and protest?
10:46Ms. Alia Hamza has raised this point.
10:50And she has been a party worker through and through.
10:54So, how will the PTI cater to this confusion?
10:58There is no confusion.
11:00This can be of a few people.
11:02We had a detailed meeting with Mr. Imran Khan.
11:04We did not want to come on the streets at this time.
11:06We want to prove this matter in court on a juridical level with evidence.
11:10And we will do it.
11:12And we are talking to you.
11:14We are talking to the media.
11:16We decide when we will come on the streets
11:18and when we will not come on the streets.
11:20On every occasion, we do not come on the streets.
11:22So, if this is someone's opinion,
11:24then it is their personal opinion.
11:26If someone leaked a conversation,
11:28then it is an unimportant opinion and an unimportant leak.
11:30It has nothing to do with the party's decisions
11:32and there is no confusion in anyone.
11:34That is why we want to bring this matter
11:36to the international level
11:38and to the international level
11:40and to show what is happening
11:42with justice in Pakistan
11:44and what kind of decisions are being made.
11:46It is a very interesting decision.
11:48A press release was made
11:50and it was said that this money
11:52was from the state of Pakistan
11:54and why was it given to the Supreme Court?
11:56As if the Supreme Court is not a part of Pakistan.
11:58The Supreme Court had to make a decision
12:00and it did.
12:02First, Mr. Aleema Khan said this.
12:04After that, Mr. Faisal Chaudhary said this
12:06that we will bring this matter
12:08to the international level.
12:10Is Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
12:12still in a state of hope
12:14for the 20th of January?
12:16No, no.
12:18This has nothing to do
12:20with what kind of government
12:22there is in America or not.
12:24Human rights are international.
12:26They have nothing to do
12:28with any country.
12:30They are never called an internal matter.
12:32We are in the process of
12:34signing the
12:36international treaties.
12:38We are signing them.
12:40We are being trialled in military courts
12:42where you are being punished
12:44in a blind courtroom.
12:46Some are being punished for 10 years,
12:48some for 6 years.
12:50I have a question about that as well.
12:52There are different steps in that as well
12:54where people have
12:56legal remedies.
12:58And there have been
13:00mafias there as well.
13:02Can this be called a blind law
13:04considering that there are
13:06legal remedies and steps
13:08being taken?
13:10Yes, it is a blind law.
13:12The hearing in the Supreme Court
13:14was such that
13:16everyone was shocked.
13:18This is a law that
13:20is not seen anywhere else in the world.
13:22This is an interesting thing.
13:24This law was defended
13:26by Imran Khan
13:28that it should be like this.
13:30This law has always been wrong.
13:32And if anyone has ever
13:34defended this in the past,
13:36it has always been wrong.
13:38The question is,
13:40do politicians have to decide
13:42that when we are in government
13:44we will talk in a different way
13:46and we will have a different opinion
13:48that suits us.
13:50And when we are in opposition
13:52we will speak against the army
13:54and we will talk about
13:56international human rights
13:58It is wrong if this happens.
14:00It should not happen.
14:02Our past is not consistent with this country.
14:04That is why this country
14:06is in a state of confusion.
14:08There are no human rights,
14:10no decency, no law, no constitution.
14:12Every party will have to
14:14decide for the future
14:16that we will never leave
14:18the constitution and human rights.
14:20We will have to decide this
14:22very clearly.
14:24If all these communities
14:26have to decide,
14:28then all the communities will have to do it.
14:30On one hand, we are talking about all the communities
14:32and we are talking about negotiations.
14:34We do wish that the negotiations
14:36can find a solution to this
14:38so that there is no political instability.
14:40But at the same time,
14:42there is a desire and demand
14:44to talk to the army.
14:46So if the political communities
14:48have to sit together and decide
14:50that all people, the army,
14:52the judiciary, any other institution
14:54have to meet the army,
14:56why should we not meet the army?
14:58No, not at all.
15:00We have to talk to everyone.
15:02We have to talk to the people
15:04who are our enemies.
15:06The law is on one side,
15:08the political communities are on the other.
15:10All the political communities
15:12have to come together and demand.
15:14But who will be the target of their demands?
15:16Who will they talk to?
15:18They have to talk to the people.
15:20One community or ten communities
15:22who are in the government,
15:24they are sitting on their lap,
15:26they are standing with a stick,
15:28they are of Form 47,
15:30they do not want to talk.
15:32We are inviting them through this
15:34negotiation process.
15:36And the other communities
15:38who are not in the government,
15:40we are telling them to come
15:42with us so that we can all
15:44fix the system of this country.
15:46But we have to talk to the people.
15:48They have to say that this is
15:50not right,
15:52this is not right,
15:54this is not right,
15:56this is not right,
15:58this is not right,
16:00this is not right,
16:02this is not right,
16:04this is not right,
16:06this is not right,
16:08this is not right,
16:10this is not right,
16:12this is not right,
16:14this is not right,
16:16this is not right,
16:18We should tell the communities
16:20that we will not give up,
16:22we will not look for a solution.
16:24But we have to tell them
16:26that they should not interfere.
16:28And we will have to decide
16:30a process according to the law.
16:32There is no discussion in this
16:34that we should talk and
16:36proceed with the process.
16:38The purpose of which is that
16:40the country should be governed
16:42by the law and the constitution.
16:44We are not going to find
16:46a solution to this problem.
16:48We are going to find a solution
16:50to this problem.
16:52We are going to find a solution
16:54to this problem.
16:56We are going to find a solution
16:58to this problem.
17:00We are going to find a solution
17:02to this problem.
17:04We are going to find a solution
17:06to this problem.
17:08We are going to find a solution
17:10to this problem.
17:12We are going to find a solution
17:14to this problem.
17:44We are going to find a solution
17:46to this problem.
17:48We are going to find a solution
17:50to this problem.
17:52We are going to find a solution
17:54to this problem.
17:56We are going to find a solution
17:58to this problem.
18:00We are going to find a solution
18:02to this problem.
18:04We are going to find a solution
18:06to this problem.
18:08We are going to find a solution
18:10to this problem.
18:12We are going to find a solution
18:14to this problem.
18:16We are going to find a solution
18:18to this problem.
18:20We are going to find a solution
18:22to this problem.
18:24We are going to find a solution
18:26to this problem.
18:28We are going to find a solution
18:30to this problem.
18:32We are going to find a solution
18:34to this problem.
18:36We are going to find a solution
18:38to this problem.
18:40We are going to find a solution
18:42to this problem.
19:10...
19:12...
19:14...
19:16...
19:18...
19:20...
19:22...
19:24...
19:26...
19:28...
19:30...
19:32...
19:34...
19:36...
19:38...
19:40...
19:42...
19:44...
19:46...
19:48...
19:50...
19:52...
19:54...
19:56...
19:58...
20:00...
20:02...
20:04...
20:06...
20:08...
20:10...
20:12...
20:14...
20:16...
20:18...
20:20...
20:22...
20:24...
20:26...
20:28...
20:30...
20:32...
20:34...
20:36...
20:38...
20:40...
20:42...
20:44...
20:46...
20:48...
20:50...
20:52...
20:54...
20:56...
20:58...
21:00...
21:02...
21:04...
21:06...
21:08...
21:10...
21:12...
21:14...
21:16...
21:18...
21:20...
21:22...
21:24...
21:26...
21:28...
21:30...
21:32...
21:34...
21:36...
21:38...
21:40...
21:42...
21:44...
21:46...
21:48...
21:50...
21:52...
21:54...
21:56...
21:58like shell or machine gun or sniper firing,
22:02then it is a good practice.
22:04But this is not our policy.
22:05With such workers,
22:06because it is a norm that
22:07previously PTI workers were not being owned,
22:09but now they have been owned,
22:10those who have been released,
22:11they have been owned.
22:12Earlier it was said that these are not our workers.
22:14Will it be necessary for PTI to still keep such workers
22:17by their necks, Mr. Salman Akhmar?
22:20Or will there be some kind of disciplinary action?
22:25Look, Mr. Imran Khan has said that
22:27those who have done something illegal,
22:31we will look at them.
22:32If they are punished,
22:33look what has happened here.
22:34Breaking a pot,
22:35walking four steps from the road,
22:38you have punished people for 10 years.
22:40This is not right.
22:41The way punishments have been given here,
22:43they have nothing to do with that action.
22:45Burning houses,
22:46attacking government blocks,
22:47that is not right.
22:48We have shown government blocks,
22:49where have they been burnt?
22:51Look, we have been saying from day one
22:53that show us the CCTV footage of the incident where we were burnt.
22:56Who set the fire?
22:57We have not been shown the CCTV footage till date.
23:00We have been shown people breaking pots,
23:02people walking.
23:03CCTV footage has been released, Mr. Salman Akhmar.
23:05Its big clips have been released.
23:07No, not at all.
23:08We have released the videos.
23:09Look, CCTV...
23:10There are pictures,
23:11there are videos.
23:12CCTV footage is that...
23:13Yes, yes, go ahead.
23:14I am saying,
23:15CCTV footage is that which is continuous,
23:18which you show from 10 am to 8 pm,
23:22why don't you show it for 10-12 hours?
23:24Out of that,
23:25bits and pieces are shown.
23:27Ok, you are saying that
23:28the entire CCTV footage should be shown.
23:30Ok, Mr. Salman Akhmar.
23:31Yes, this is necessary.
23:32I got it.
23:33Legally, this is necessary,
23:34so that it is known,
23:35who opened the gate,
23:36who set it on fire,
23:37who set it on fire.
23:38All those things have been erased.
23:39Ok, Mr. Salman Akhmar.
23:40Only the fire is shown,
23:41those who set the fire are not shown.
23:43So, in other words,
23:44your demand right now is
23:45that the entire CCTV footage should be released,
23:47despite the fact that those pieces have been done.
23:49Absolutely.
23:50And if that CCTV footage is not there,
23:51then where did it go?
23:52How did this happen that
23:53the CCTV footage was lost in 8 places
23:55and only small pieces were left?
23:57Ok, Mr. Salman Akhmar.
23:58Thank you very much for being in the program.
24:00We will go to the break with this.
24:01After the break, we will continue the show.
24:06We have with us Mr. Khurram Dastagir.
24:08Mr. Khurram, thank you very much
24:09for joining me in the program.
24:10It's a pleasure having you.
24:11Mr. Khurram, first tell me,
24:12I am coming towards today's meeting.
24:14It is a very important meeting.
24:15But you had complained that
24:16I don't meet Mr. Mian Nawaz Sharif.
24:18Did you meet him?
24:19Or did Mr. Rana Sanawal tell you
24:20that these complaints have been resolved?
24:22Is that correct?
24:24Yes.
24:25I am very grateful to Mr. Mian Nawaz Sharif
24:27that he invited me to his grandson's funeral.
24:30I met him there.
24:32And I didn't have any complaints before.
24:35Even now.
24:36If there are any,
24:37then it is a suggestion and advice
24:39that the present party,
24:41after the 2024 elections,
24:44the political situation that is going to arise,
24:47the new terrorism that has arisen in the country,
24:50or the continuous attack
24:52by the Intishari Jamaat.
24:55The kind of broadening and consultation
24:58that should be done on all these issues,
25:00is still lacking.
25:01So my point of view is present in some places.
25:03But anyway,
25:04Mr. Khurram showed his kindness.
25:06So you are saying
25:07that he should be active in politics.
25:09He should play his role.
25:10He should play the role of a leader.
25:11Today, you met his Prime Minister.
25:14Was it as a brother
25:15or as a Prime Minister?
25:17Was it for consultation?
25:19Will there be more activity in the political role?
25:21Or not?
25:23Look, two or three issues are very clear.
25:26This week,
25:27you know that
25:29the written demands from Tariq-e-Insaaf,
25:32their discussion was important.
25:35The Prime Minister keeps taking guidance from his elder brother.
25:40Who is also the President of the party at the moment.
25:43Similarly,
25:44you know that
25:46in recent weeks,
25:48Alhamdulillah,
25:49there has been a very clear
25:51stagnation in the development of Pakistan.
25:54And the signs of that
25:56have also been reported
25:58by the President of the Muslim League.
26:01And the third thing,
26:02which will be mentioned in detail,
26:04is that
26:05Donald Trump is taking up the goal tomorrow.
26:08For that,
26:09Pakistan has to do its embassy,
26:11or the posture of the embassy,
26:14which is going to work in the coming days,
26:17that will also be discussed.
26:19So, Khurramtar Sagi Sahib,
26:20I will come to the first and the second later.
26:22This third thing is very important,
26:23because tomorrow is 20th January.
26:25Donald Trump is really taking up the goal.
26:27But,
26:28did all this discussion
26:29that Nawaz Sharif Sahib and Shehbaz Sharif Sahib had,
26:31did it contain any suspicion
26:33that there could be pressure from Donald Trump
26:35or his government
26:37to release Imran Khan?
26:39Considering
26:40that,
26:41at some point in time,
26:42it was done by Bill Clinton
26:43for Nawaz Sharif Sahib.
26:46Yes,
26:47we don't know the details of the discussion.
26:49So,
26:50I cannot comment on that.
26:52But,
26:53as a government,
26:54or the ruling party,
26:56it is very clear to us
26:58that
26:59there is no expectation of any pressure.
27:02This does not mean
27:03that we should not
27:04exaggerate our embassy
27:06and not speed it up.
27:08Because,
27:09the international politicians,
27:11the way we have seen them,
27:13it is very clear that
27:15they are transactional people.
27:17Meaning,
27:18they are business people.
27:20Their book is called
27:21Art of the Deal.
27:22So,
27:23they believe in deal making.
27:25Secondly,
27:26they have no intention
27:27of spreading democracy
27:29in other countries.
27:31Or,
27:32the protection of human rights
27:34in other countries
27:35has never been Donald Trump's priority.
27:38Thirdly,
27:39he is a master of media
27:41and knows how to attract attention.
27:44So,
27:45these three things
27:46point us to the fact that
27:48unless there are new interests
27:50of the US,
27:52which have a role of Pakistan,
27:54we do not see any political pressure
27:56from the US.
27:57Okay,
27:58the way you have described
28:00the personality of the intellectuals,
28:02what type of personality
28:04does Imran Khan have?
28:05Get rid of the business thing.
28:07He is also on the side of populism.
28:09He knows the art of dealing with media.
28:12And,
28:13he also claims that
28:14he has very good relations
28:16with very good people.
28:18So,
28:19how does he see their hopes?
28:21Number one.
28:22Number two,
28:23a lot of people from your community
28:25say that
28:26Imran Khan has a lot of expectations
28:28of the US.
28:29And,
28:30because of this,
28:31there will be pressure.
28:32Do you believe in this?
28:33No,
28:34look,
28:35it is clear that
28:37when Imran Khan was in power
28:39in 2018-22,
28:41he had a lot of
28:42adherence to the US.
28:44He had a lot of adherence.
28:46The leaders of the Taliban,
28:48the previous government of Pakistan,
28:50Muslim League Noon,
28:51who did not release them,
28:52he released them.
28:53In the same way,
28:54under the pressure of the US,
28:55he returned Flight Lieutenant Abhinandan
28:57to India without any clear deal.
29:03And,
29:04number three,
29:05on CPEC,
29:06it was the interest of the US
29:08to slow down CPEC.
29:10So, Imran Khan put it
29:11on the back burner.
29:12And,
29:13number four,
29:14it is a very important thing
29:15about which
29:16historians have to give
29:17clarity.
29:18What was the reason
29:19that when Imran Khan
29:20returned from Washington
29:21in July 2019,
29:22he said,
29:23I think
29:24that when did I
29:25win the Second World War?
29:26But,
29:27exactly ten days later,
29:28India cut Kashmir
29:29into pieces
29:30and occupied it.
29:31And,
29:32there was no
29:33resistance
29:34from Pakistan.
29:35So,
29:36when the Biden
29:37administration
29:38needed Pakistan,
29:39in 2021,
29:40at the time of the
29:41evacuation,
29:42Pakistan still had
29:43Imran Khan's
29:44government.
29:45They supported
29:46the withdrawal
29:47process a lot.
29:48So,
29:49all these things
29:50are pointing
29:51to this,
29:52Khurram sahib,
29:53that the relations
29:54between them
29:55are really good.
29:56So,
29:57we should
29:58expect it.
29:59No,
30:00I am saying
30:01that
30:02when
30:03Donald
30:04Trump
30:05was
30:06in the
30:07White House,
30:08the media
30:09told the
30:10media that
30:11the previous
30:12government
30:13didn't
30:14listen to
30:15them.
30:16This government
30:17is listening to
30:18us,
30:19even if we
30:20don't
30:21give them
30:22money.
30:23But,
30:24the fact
30:25is,
30:26whatever
30:27the
30:28basis
30:29is,
30:30the
30:31US
30:32needs to
30:33stop
30:34China's
30:35way.
30:36But,
30:37Khurram sahib,
30:38India is
30:39important for
30:40China.
30:41And,
30:42India is
30:43also against
30:44Pakistan.
30:45And,
30:46as long as
30:47China and
30:48Pakistan are
30:49together,
30:50the
30:51India
30:52issues
30:53are a
30:54little
30:55difficult.
30:56So,
30:57if China
30:58is in
30:59Donald
31:00Trump's
31:01position,
31:02there
31:03will be
31:04a
31:05conflict
31:06between
31:07China and
31:08Pakistan.
31:09That's
31:10why the
31:11international
31:12media
31:13have
31:14noted
31:15that
31:16the
31:17world is
31:18worried
31:19about
31:20Trump's
31:21arrival,
31:22except
31:23India,
31:24where
31:25people are
31:26celebrating
31:27their
31:28happiness.
31:29So,
31:30Pakistan
31:31will always
31:32be important
31:33due to
31:34its geographical
31:35status.
31:36But,
31:37on the
31:38basis of
31:39that,
31:40there is
31:41almost
31:42zero
31:43possibility
31:44of
31:45interference
31:46in
31:47Pakistan's
31:48politics.
31:49Okay,
31:50now let's
31:51talk about
31:52the
31:53negotiations
31:54that are
31:55taking
31:56place
31:57here.
31:58So,
31:59the
32:00negotiations
32:01are
32:02not
32:03possible.
32:04Salman
32:05Akhmaraj
32:06has
32:07said
32:08in
32:09my
32:10program
32:11that
32:12the
32:13negotiations
32:14are
32:15not
32:16possible
32:17because
32:18the
32:19government
32:20hasn't
32:21made
32:22a
32:23judicial
32:24commission
32:25yet.
32:26Yes,
32:27the
32:28government
32:29hasn't
32:30made a
32:31judicial
32:32commission
32:33yet.
32:34So,
32:35the
32:36negotiations
32:37are
32:38not
32:39possible
32:40because
32:41the
32:42government
32:43hasn't
32:44made a
32:45judicial
32:46commission
32:47yet.
32:48So,
32:49the
32:50negotiations
32:51are
32:52not
32:53possible
32:54because
32:55the
32:56government
32:57hasn't
32:58made a
32:59judicial
33:00commission
33:01yet.
33:02So,
33:03the
33:04negotiations
33:05are
33:06not
33:07possible
33:08because
33:09the
33:10government
33:11hasn't
33:12made a
33:13judicial
33:14commission
33:15yet.
33:16So,
33:17the
33:18negotiations
33:19are not
33:20possible
33:21because
33:22the
33:23government
33:24hasn't
33:26made a
33:27judicial
33:28commission
33:29yet.
33:30So,
33:31the
33:32government
33:33hasn't
33:34made a
33:35judicial
33:36commission
33:37yet.
33:38So,
33:39the
33:40government
33:41hasn't
33:42made a
33:43judicial
33:44commission
33:45yet.
33:46So,
33:47the
33:48government
33:49hasn't
33:50made a
33:51judicial
33:52commission
33:53yet.
33:54So,
33:55the
33:56government
33:57hasn't
33:58made a
33:59judicial
34:00commission
34:01yet.
34:02So,
34:03the
34:04government
34:05hasn't
34:06made a
34:07judicial
34:08commission
34:09yet.
34:10So,
34:11the
34:12government
34:13hasn't
34:14made a
34:15judicial
34:16commission
34:17yet.
34:18So,
34:19the
34:20government
34:21hasn't
34:22made a
34:23judicial
34:24commission
34:25yet.
34:26So,
34:27the
34:28government
34:29hasn't
34:30made a
34:31judicial
34:32commission
34:33yet.
34:34So,
34:35the
34:36government
34:37hasn't
34:38made a
34:39judicial
34:40commission
34:41yet.
34:42So,
34:43the
34:44government
34:45hasn't
34:46made a
34:47judicial
34:48commission
34:49yet.
34:50So,
34:51the
34:52government
34:53hasn't
34:54made a
34:55judicial
34:56commission
34:57yet.
34:58So,
34:59the
35:00government
35:01hasn't
35:02made a
35:03judicial
35:04commission
35:05yet.
35:06So,
35:07the
35:08government
35:09hasn't
35:10made a
35:11judicial
35:12commission
35:13yet.
35:14So,
35:15the
35:16government
35:17hasn't
35:18made a
35:19judicial
35:20commission
35:21yet.
35:22So,
35:23the
35:24government
35:25hasn't
35:26made a
35:27judicial
35:28commission
35:29yet.
35:30So,
35:31the
35:32government
35:33hasn't
35:34made a
35:35judicial
35:36commission
35:37yet.
35:38So,
35:39the
35:40government
35:41hasn't
35:42made a
35:43judicial
35:44commission
35:45yet.
35:46So,
35:47the
35:48government
35:49hasn't
35:50made a
35:51judicial
35:52commission
35:53yet.
35:54So,
35:55the
35:56government
35:57hasn't
35:58made a
35:59judicial
36:00commission
36:01yet.
36:02So,
36:03the
36:04government
36:05hasn't
36:06made a
36:07judicial
36:08commission
36:09yet.
36:10So,
36:11the
36:12government
36:13hasn't
36:14made a
36:15judicial
36:16commission
36:17yet.
36:18So,
36:19the
36:20government
36:21hasn't
36:22made a
36:23judicial
36:24commission
36:25yet.
36:26So,
36:27the
36:28government
36:29hasn't
36:30made a
36:31judicial
36:32commission
36:33yet.
36:34So,
36:35the
36:36government
36:37hasn't
36:38made a
36:39judicial
36:40commission
36:41yet.
36:42So,
36:43the
36:44government
36:45hasn't
36:46made a
36:47judicial
36:48commission
36:49yet.
36:50So,
36:51the
36:52government
36:53hasn't
36:54made a
36:55judicial
36:56commission
36:57yet.
36:58So,
36:59the
37:00government
37:01hasn't
37:02made a
37:03judicial
37:04commission
37:05yet.
37:06So,
37:07the
37:08government
37:09hasn't
37:10made a
37:11judicial
37:12commission
37:13yet.
37:14So,
37:15the
37:16government
37:17hasn't
37:18made a
37:19judicial
37:20commission
37:21yet.
37:22So,
37:23the
37:24government
37:25hasn't
37:26made a
37:27judicial
37:28commission
37:29yet.
37:30So,
37:31the
37:32government
37:33hasn't
37:34made a
37:35judicial
37:36commission
37:37yet.
37:38So,
37:39the
37:40government
37:41hasn't
37:42made a
37:43judicial
37:44commission
37:45yet.
37:46So,
37:47the
37:48government
37:49hasn't
37:50made a
37:51judicial
37:52commission
37:53yet.
37:54So,
37:55the
37:56government
37:57hasn't
37:58made a
37:59judicial
38:00commission
38:01yet.
38:02So,
38:03the
38:04government
38:05hasn't
38:06made a
38:07judicial
38:08commission
38:09yet.
38:10So,
38:11the
38:12government
38:13hasn't
38:14made a
38:15judicial
38:16commission
38:17yet.
38:18So,
38:19the
38:20government
38:21hasn't
38:22made a
38:23judicial
38:24commission
38:25yet.
38:26So,
38:27the
38:28government
38:29hasn't
38:30made a
38:31judicial
38:32commission
38:33yet.
38:34So,
38:35the
38:36government
38:37hasn't
38:38made a
38:39judicial
38:40commission
38:41yet.
38:42So,
38:43the
38:44government
38:45hasn't
38:46made a
38:47judicial
38:48commission
38:49yet.
38:50So,
38:51the
38:52government
38:53hasn't
38:54made a
38:55judicial
38:56commission
38:57yet.
38:58So,
38:59the
39:00government
39:01hasn't
39:02made a
39:03judicial
39:04commission
39:05yet.
39:11segment.
39:12They
39:13The president of the United States has been elected as the 47th president of the United States and he was the 45th president of the United States from 2016 to 2020.
39:29Trump had to face military charges and he is a former president who was convicted of military crimes.
39:38Last year, when Trump was running his electoral campaign, there were two murderers in our country.
39:44The United States is in a very crucial moment in history.
39:50In the last 100 years, for the first time, a new president has emerged.
40:01In 2021, there was a difference in the relationship between the United States and Pakistan.
40:14The Taliban were moving from Afghanistan to the United States.
40:20Pakistan was playing a key role at that time and was an important player in this region.
40:26But now the situation has changed for both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
40:31At this time, the situation is that Afghanistan is no longer the center of relations between Pakistan and the United States.
40:37There are also fears that when Trump comes to power, Pakistan will not be in a very important position in the US agenda.
40:47But will Trump interfere in Pakistan's internal politics or not?
40:52There is a lot of speculation on this.
40:54The leaders of Pakistan's movement for justice say that they will pressurize Trump in some way.
41:04But the government is actively activating its diplomatic core in this regard.
41:11You heard what happened with Khurram Dastgir a while ago.
41:14Not just that.
41:15Let's move a little to the Middle East.
41:17The Middle East will have a direct impact on us.
41:19There are important talks about the recent ceasefire in Palestine.
41:24Trump's character is also being discussed in the Gaza matter.
41:32But remember that Trump was also an important character in making Jerusalem the capital of Israel.
41:37Because Trump's son-in-law is also a Jew.
41:42And the apologists of Israel are an important part of Trump's entire cabinet.
41:48That's why it will be important to see whether the Middle East will be better or worse.
41:55Trump does not want to go to war in any way.
41:59But at the same time, he has a very soft corner for Israel.
42:05Will there be ease for Palestinians in the coming times or difficulties?
42:10This is also a question.
42:11Because Trump is a businessman.
42:13So doing business activities with Pakistan should be the first priority for Pakistan at this time.
42:18And then all the political things will be left behind.
42:21With this, I would like to take your leave.
42:23Take care of yourself.
42:24InshaAllah, see you next week.
42:25Allah Hafiz.