Giuliani Associate Drops Biden Investigation BOMBSHELL
Giuliani Associate Drops Biden Investigation BOMBSHELL
Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:00 There's a lot of cultural focus on
00:01 people like transitioning into
00:03 their villain era these days.
00:04 But what about the hero era and
00:06 the turn from villain to hero?
00:08 We actually have an example of that
00:10 in politics, maybe.
00:11 Probably not, stay tuned.
00:12 Lev Parnas is back in the news
00:14 though, I can tell you that.
00:16 You remember him from the Rudy
00:17 Giuliani, Ukraine blackmail thing.
00:20 No, he's popped back up.
00:21 And he's apparently switched sides.
00:23 He is now claiming that he has
00:25 direct experience that proves that
00:27 the claims being made against
00:29 Joe Biden and Hunter Biden have
00:31 nothing to them.
00:32 We're going to give you a little
00:33 bit of information on that.
00:34 But if you weren't following this
00:35 a couple years ago,
00:36 Lev Parnas is a former associate of
00:38 Rudy Giuliani, who was central to
00:39 Trump's scheme to find dirt on
00:41 the Bidens in Ukraine.
00:42 He just sent top House Republicans
00:44 a letter earlier this week saying
00:46 he was willing to testify that
00:48 their probe into corruption
00:49 allegations regarding President Joe
00:51 Biden and his family has no merit.
00:53 So he is willing to testify.
00:55 Stay tuned to find out if they're
00:57 going to let him.
00:58 We're going to let you know at
00:59 the end of this story.
01:00 For now, though,
01:01 here's what he has to say.
01:03 Giuliani tasked me with traveling
01:04 to Ukraine throughout March, April,
01:06 and May of 2019 to interview
01:08 different people who had promised
01:09 to give us information and
01:11 evidence including records of
01:12 bribes, bank records,
01:13 incriminating tapes.
01:15 Yet every time I went on these
01:16 trips and conducted these
01:18 interviews, I came up with nothing.
01:20 It was a fishing expedition, and
01:22 they had reason to believe there
01:23 were fish and yet no fish.
01:25 He says throughout all of these
01:26 months of work,
01:27 the extensive campaigns and
01:29 networking done by Trump allies and
01:30 Giuliani associates, including
01:32 the enormously thorough interviews
01:34 and assignments that I undertook.
01:35 There has never been any evidence
01:37 that Hunter or
01:38 Joe Biden committed any crimes
01:40 related to Ukrainian politics.
01:42 Never during any of my
01:43 communications with Ukrainian
01:44 officials or connections to
01:45 Burisma did any of them confirm or
01:47 provide concrete facts linking
01:49 the Bidens to illegal activities.
01:51 Now, so why then was it such
01:53 a big story for a long time?
01:54 Well, Lev Parnas,
01:56 says in fact they asked me multiple
01:58 times why our team was so
01:59 concerned with this idea.
02:01 The truth is that everyone from
02:03 Giuliani and the BLT team to
02:04 Devin Nunes and his colleagues to
02:06 the people at Fox News knew that
02:08 these allegations against
02:09 the Bidens were false.
02:11 There has never been any actual
02:12 factual evidence, only conspiracy
02:14 theories spread by people who knew
02:16 exactly what they were doing.
02:17 Now, Lev Parnas is a guy that if
02:19 you want to believe that he's just
02:21 lying, I cannot tell you that
02:23 there are not conspiracy
02:25 theories that tell you that there
02:27 are not good historic reasons to
02:29 believe that he might be willing
02:31 to lie.
02:31 He also, however, has had many,
02:33 many conversations with all these
02:35 people.
02:35 And so if Rudy Giuliani along
02:37 the way had been very clear that he
02:38 was doing this to find dirt on
02:39 the Bidens, but he didn't actually
02:41 believe that it was true.
02:42 And he believed that just talking
02:44 about this even without evidence
02:46 could get a lot of what they want
02:47 out of it, which is clearly
02:48 their strategy.
02:49 He would have been there for
02:51 those conversations.
02:52 So anyway, JR,
02:53 what do you make of this?
02:54 >> It's wild, and there's a thing,
02:55 you have to try and ask yourself.
02:57 I think you were saying that
02:58 at the back end.
02:59 So if this isn't the case,
03:00 many people say don't believe him,
03:02 he's a disgruntled ex-employee,
03:04 whatever the normal mantra is.
03:05 So what is it that he experienced?
03:08 And if you have to guess,
03:09 maybe there's tons of evidence.
03:11 And Lev Parnas is now trying to
03:12 flip the script and
03:13 say that there was absolutely none.
03:15 He went on constant fishing
03:16 expeditions.
03:17 He went through extensive
03:18 interviews and talks and
03:20 travel to find some evidence.
03:22 If he's lying about the fact that
03:24 there's now no evidence and
03:25 everyone knew there was no evidence,
03:27 where the F is the evidence?
03:29 That's all, or even just some of
03:31 the build up to that evidence.
03:32 I mean, we still know, as Trump is
03:34 saying now, it's not like he's been
03:36 on trial and has been convicted of
03:37 anything, but charges come up and
03:39 they reveal some of the evidence.
03:41 As people see that evidence,
03:42 which many times Trump gave way
03:43 before they even brought any
03:44 charges because he keeps talking on
03:45 truth social about things that he
03:46 did illegally.
03:47 All that evidence is out there in
03:48 front of many people.
03:49 We don't have everything, but
03:51 we have enough for people to go,
03:52 something's off here.
03:53 All we have in these situations is
03:54 people accusing,
03:55 saying this probably happened, and
03:57 I have a source that I can't name
03:59 yet, I have a source that just
04:01 disappeared, that constantly tell
04:02 me something different.
04:04 Show me something, again,
04:05 I've said it so many times.
04:07 Joe Biden is not my uncle.
04:09 If he did some illegal stuff along
04:11 with Hunter, show me,
04:12 they still have it.
04:14 >> They seemingly don't have it.
04:16 And they appear to not have it
04:18 because it isn't there to be had.
04:20 In any event, as we said in
04:22 the intro, Lev Parnas sent this
04:23 letter, but he is willing to do
04:25 more.
04:26 And if you believe that he's lying,
04:27 and you want a chance to question
04:29 him, perhaps under oath,
04:30 that's possible.
04:32 He says, I am willing to testify
04:33 under oath in Congress regarding
04:35 any of these matters, and
04:36 answer any questions that you might
04:38 have, again, remember this was
04:39 to top House Republicans, or
04:41 provide you with any texts or
04:42 correspondence in these situations
04:44 I've described in this letter.
04:46 So he could still be planning to
04:47 lie, but he is willing to go under
04:49 oath.
04:50 That means there's actual legal
04:51 consequences for lying.
04:53 He's willing to provide evidence,
04:55 this is a major bombshell.
04:56 And so you will be shocked to find
04:58 out that House Oversight Committee
05:00 Chairman James Comer asked about
05:02 this, told HuffPost,
05:04 I don't think that that's credible.
05:06 [LAUGH] >> I don't know that you
05:08 have the best track record,
05:10 James Comer, on figuring out what's
05:12 credible and what's not.
05:14 Your star witnesses are on the run
05:17 from the law.
05:18 [LAUGH] >> And you had no problem
05:19 with Lev Parnas back when you
05:21 thought he could help prove your
05:23 conspiracies, suddenly you're not
05:26 interested.
05:27 If there's any way, I don't know,
05:28 before the Senate or whatever,
05:29 they could have him come in and
05:31 speak, I don't know what he'll say.
05:32 I don't know if he's credible, but
05:34 you cannot pretend to be super
05:36 interested in the Burisma stuff,
05:38 and not be interested in what one
05:40 of the chief investigators into it