Why You Scorn People!

Stefan Molyneux
Stefan Molyneux
  • 8 months ago
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Get my new series on the Truth About the French Revolution, access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and more!

See you soon!

https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022

Locals Questions Answered 5 Jan 2024

What do you think about having feelings of superiority and disdain for most strangers? When I'm walking around at Walmart for example I will often find myself making commentary in my head about how much of a disaster most of these peoples' lives must be, given their appearance (and the controllability of it). Just going by their obscene weight, lack of hygiene, generally sickly appearance, or the fact they have tattoos, piercings, a tacky outfit showing way too much skin, etc., I feel like I can assume most people's personal lives are a mess and that I would get bored after 5 minutes in conversation with any one of them if I stopped and said hi. I don't know why but I feel drawn to a sense of comfort about being deeper and less impulsive than all these other people. It's something I wish didn't occupy my mind so much and I fear it could also make me anti-social.

Transcript: https://freedomain.com/why-you-scorn-people-transcript/
Transcript
00:00 All right, good morning everybody. Sorry it's taking me a little while to get to these questions
00:04 But here is some from a non-listener. This is from freedomand.locals.com
00:09 What do you think about having feelings of superiority and disdain for most strangers?
00:13 When I'm walking around at Walmart, for example
00:16 I will often find myself making commentary in my head about how much of a disaster most of these people's lives must be
00:20 given their appearance and
00:23 the controllability of it. Just going by their obscene weight, lack of hygiene,
00:27 generally sickly appearance, or the fact that they have tattoos, piercings, a tacky outfit showing way too much skin, etc.
00:33 I feel like I can assume most people's personal lives are a mess and
00:35 that I would get bored after five minutes in conversation with any one of them if I stopped and said hi.
00:40 I don't know why
00:42 but I feel drawn to a sense of comfort about being deeper and less impulsive than all these people.
00:47 It's something I wish I didn't occupy my mind so much and I fear it could also make me
00:51 antisocial.
00:54 That is very
00:56 interesting, very interesting.
00:58 Look, I mean
01:01 there's something funny my daughter once said about owls that they just they just stand there
01:06 staring at you, judging.
01:09 Judging others,
01:13 particularly strangers, is
01:15 how we operate, it's what we do as human beings. I mean we have to, right? Of course the greatest source of danger
01:22 for people is people. People are the greatest predators, the greatest threats, the greatest concerns and
01:28 now of course with social media people's power to harm and disrupt has gone beyond
01:33 the personal to the social to the reputational and so on, right?
01:38 It used to be that you might get into a duel, now somebody just anonymously calls HR or something like that, right?
01:44 So we do have, like when we're around strangers,
01:49 we are in a constant state, particularly if you're male, I think, we are in a constant state of
01:56 evaluation. Now, I don't mean paranoia,
02:00 but if you sort of think about if you're sort of home alone or if you're with a
02:05 really great circle of close friends and family, then there's a level of trust and relaxation there
02:10 that is not exactly the same as what occurs over the course of
02:16 your time outside among strangers. I think this is particularly true
02:20 given that
02:23 we know fewer and fewer people in our community and our environment, right?
02:26 So in the past you had your family and then you have your neighbors and your neighbors might come and go a little bit,
02:33 but now we spend a lot of time moving around, we spend a lot of time
02:36 around people we don't really know and sometimes around cultures we don't really know much about and
02:44 so the sort of act of judging is the act of scanning for
02:50 potential problems. I mean, especially also now we've seen a lot of videos on social media of
02:58 people freaking out, you know, people
03:01 throwing things, people yelling, people fighting and so on and I think that's really enhanced our sense of potential concern when it comes to the
03:08 world. I mean, it's funny, you know, and I mentioned this before about
03:12 over the course of my life
03:14 outside of my home, I
03:16 can't... just shortly before I
03:19 left England at the age of 11, my friends and I were mugged by a bunch of new immigrants,
03:25 but before that I had no sense of danger in the world. I had no sense of danger in the world.
03:31 I roamed around, I took buses, I went everywhere and I
03:36 honestly cannot remember feeling any sense of danger or concern in the world and
03:42 that's
03:43 not the case in the world anymore for most people and with some places, of course.
03:47 Absolutely, you live in the country and it's sort of a different matter, but that is the world. So having a sort of low-grade
03:55 evaluation routine playing behind your eyeballs is not at all unusual.
04:02 I wouldn't feel like it's crazy or paranoid or anything like that. Obviously, you don't want to go too far,
04:07 but that general sense of unease is really
04:11 essential in
04:12 the world. It's a really... it's not essential in the world. It's an essential characteristic of
04:17 the modern world, the modern West, that sense of vague unease, right?
04:22 Bowling Alone by Putnam.
04:25 It's a good book for this kind of stuff, to just understand that general sense of unease. That general sense of unease is
04:31 one of the things that is
04:33 kind of vaguely engineered by a lot of the powers that be because that vague sense of unease makes you
04:39 less robust in many ways. I think in more extreme examples,
04:43 it's potential that it could lead to some health issues, just from what I've read about, stress levels, cortisol, and so on.
04:49 So, probably it's a good idea to try and get to as low stress an environment as possible.
04:53 I say this as a public philosopher knowing that it's kind of ironic that I say this, but nonetheless, I think it's
04:59 kind of important. So as far as judging people, so what are you judging them
05:06 for? Well,
05:09 you're judging them for the chaos and disorganization of their lives.
05:13 Now,
05:15 why do you judge that? Well, because you live in a society
05:19 where you'll be forced to pay for or subsidize vast portions of this ill health and dysfunction. I
05:27 mean, this is when the people who are unhealthy, who are like, "Well, why do you care what I do
05:31 to my body?" It's like, "Well, because what you do to your body does things to my wallet."
05:37 I mean, literally like being in a rowboat in the middle of the ocean with a bunch of people.
05:42 One guy drills
05:45 under his seat into the
05:47 hole into the bottom of the boat, and he's like, "Well, what do you care what I do with my seat?"
05:51 It's like, "No, no, no, we're all in this together. Like, you drill a hole and we all sink, right?"
05:56 So,
05:58 the
06:00 dysfunction of people's lives is
06:02 not something that is isolated to them. Now, I get that we're all in society together, that we all have a stake in each
06:09 other, and even in the absence of
06:11 sort of coercive income redistribution, that you would have a care and concern for people.
06:17 Obviously, we have it at a moral level, but we also have it at a practical level, which is
06:23 the more chaos and dysfunction in people's lives,
06:26 the more likely they are
06:29 to
06:30 turn to crime, the more likely they are to raise children who will have
06:34 significant dysfunctions and may bully our kids or may get involved in crime themselves.
06:39 And, of course, even if it were a purely a
06:42 voluntary free market health care system,
06:45 people who
06:48 did not take care of their own health or pursued active lifestyles, or I guess inactive life, pursued lifestyles that
06:54 would cause them to be ill,
06:57 well, they are driving up the cost of health care, and they are reducing the accessibility of health care for other people, right?
07:05 So, if you are one of these sort of Andy Kaufman unlucky people who gets lung cancer without smoking, well, all the smokers are
07:12 taking up all of the treatment for lung cancer facilities and driving up the cost of lung cancer. Now, I get that they're also increasing
07:19 the demand, which is going to increase the supply,
07:21 but
07:23 it's a problem. If you are a healthy guy,
07:27 keep your weight reasonable, exercise, and then you have some congenital heart defect that gives you
07:32 some massive heart attack or something, and
07:35 you go into the emergency room, but there are three people ahead of you with even worse heart attacks because they are obese and
07:43 don't exercise, well, that's lifestyle, right, for the most part. And
07:47 so, you're going to die. Like, even in a pure free market situation, you're going to die,
07:53 probably, because those people overate and didn't exercise.
07:57 And it's funny, you know, the environmental movement should be highly critical of people who are obese because they are consuming, you know, two plus
08:05 times the amount of food that they need to live, and all of that, all of those extra
08:10 2,500 or 3,000 or 1,500 calories a day is
08:13 extremely environmentally
08:17 consumptive, right? You consume a lot of environmental resources to produce all of that extra food and all the growing irrigation,
08:23 pesticides, gasoline to process the food and drive it and package it, and right, so, and the heat to cook it, and like, it's
08:30 just a massive amount of environmental waste.
08:32 But it's not something that, it's not something that happens. So, there's even that too, right, which is if you think of
08:39 people who are obese,
08:41 then there's a lot of consumption of resources that is unnecessary. It's wasteful.
08:47 I mean, it's not only are they having problems with their joints and heart problems and so mobility problems and fertility problems, but
08:55 they're also consuming a lot of resources that otherwise would be freed up for other things, would be available for
09:00 other things. I mean, in a sort of very
09:04 real way,
09:06 everyone who's overweight is someone else who's hungry,
09:09 because they can't afford the food or, and may not be someone in
09:16 the town or the country, but somewhere in the world, because somebody is overweight. Somebody else is
09:21 very hungry,
09:24 because there's only so much food, right?
09:26 I know it's not a zero-sum game in their supply and demand, but even if the people who are hungry drive up the price of
09:32 food to the point, sorry, even if the people who are overweight have consumed so much food that they've
09:37 driven up the price of food so that the people who are poor can't afford that food, or can't afford as much of it.
09:44 I mean, I certainly as a kid would go to bed hungry sometimes because we couldn't afford
09:47 food.
09:49 So, is there a judgment aspect and the threat aspect involved in it?
09:53 I think so, because if you sort of think of a community where somebody was acting in a dysfunctional manner, like some sort of tribe
09:59 or something, so somebody's acting in a dysfunctional manner,
10:01 well, you would talk to that person, right?
10:04 I mean, there's a scene that still sticks in my head many
10:07 decades later from Goodfellas, where even the criminals are saying to the guy who's married with kids,
10:12 but who's having an affair, like, "You can't leave your wife. Like, your kids need you. You can't leave your wife.
10:17 You gotta sort this out." So, they are acting in a community manner. Now, when people act in a dysfunctional manner,
10:24 normally the community would move in to sort it out, right?
10:28 So, I mean, there's a, I don't know how true it is because I'm not any kind of expert on
10:33 East Asian culture, but I was reading, I've read a couple of references over the years of women saying,
10:40 "Well, the reason why Asians aren't fat
10:43 often is because if, you know, particularly the women, like, if we gain weight, our mothers-in-law, our grandmothers will, like, relentlessly
10:51 shame us and get us to lose the weight or not gain any more weight and that kind of stuff.
10:56 That is just rentless." So, they move in, and that, of course, would have come out of a culture where,
11:01 certainly in
11:04 places like Japan, food is pretty, pretty hard to get, right?
11:07 I mean, a lot of fishing, of course, but rice is notoriously hard and complicated, a lot of, a lot of irrigation and water, obviously, required.
11:14 So, they would move in and say, "You're overeating and it's not good." And so, so, normally in a community,
11:20 you would be on the lookout for
11:22 dysfunctional members of the society, and you would move to do something about it. It could be comfort,
11:29 it could be a tough love, it could be self-knowledge, it could be strictness,
11:33 it could be any number of things that you would do, but you would do something.
11:37 Because the societies that didn't evolve that, well, they would slowly drift away from reason and restraint and
11:43 ethics, in a way, and wouldn't, wouldn't function, right? They just wouldn't function.
11:47 So, and of course, also, it's sort of known, I talk about this in my Peaceful Parenting book, it's kind of known that
11:53 obese
11:55 mothers, it will give birth to children who are obese and more susceptible to
12:01 obesity, right, to overeating as well, right? So, that, that way, the obese mother is producing a child
12:07 that's going to have a higher caloric requirement than a
12:10 the child of a mother who's not obese, right? And so, that's going to have an effect on the tribe, right?
12:16 Particularly the men who produce the food in general, we're going to have to
12:19 produce an extra 10% food for all of the kids of obese mothers, and that's a disadvantage and annoying, and that means you're gonna have fewer
12:27 kids overall, because food is limited. So, you get all of this stuff, right?
12:30 So, yeah, of course, we're going to have judgments, and the reason, one of the reasons, the judgments become a bit obsessive or compulsive or
12:37 repetitive, let's say, is because we can't, we can't, we sort of program to do something about it,
12:43 but we can't really do
12:45 anything about it, right? We can't, you know, go up and confront them,
12:49 we can't, you know, at least not very productive thing to do, so there's really not much that we can do in
12:53 these kinds of situations, and so, but, but that doesn't change the programming, right? That doesn't change the programming.
13:00 Now, of course, there is
13:02 negatives, there are negatives to this, which I, of course, understand, we all understand, but there's some bonuses to it as well,
13:07 there's some benefits to it as well. So, one of the strange side
13:12 alleys in the development of philosophy has been the fact that
13:15 we no longer have the ability to apply,
13:19 you know, ugly levels of social pressure in order to get people to
13:23 do something different.
13:25 We can't just shame people, there aren't duels and so on, right? Because of the redistributive, the redistributive
13:32 date, I can get that word out. Now, what that means, of course, is that we do have to try and make a
13:39 rational case
13:41 from first principles. One of the reasons that
13:43 UPB evolved in my mind was a sense of helplessness over
13:49 my capacity to
13:52 alter people's behavior, and because I had no
13:55 personal authority with regards to anyone, because, I mean, obviously the big example I mentioned before is my own mother,
14:03 who I desperately wanted to
14:05 pursue some
14:07 course or path of mental health when I was younger, and encouraged her, you know, great personal blowback to do so, and
14:14 I couldn't get her to change, right? I mean, whenever I would give her money,
14:19 she'd turn around and give it to, I don't know, to me, skeevy lawyers and stuff in her
14:24 vengeance cases, and I just wasn't, I mean, I couldn't, I felt really bad
14:29 participating in anything like that, or enabling or facilitating anything like that, and so I couldn't really give her money, and
14:36 because she was getting money from the state, which is to say she was getting money from me against my will, I
14:42 didn't have any authority. I couldn't say, "Well, look, you have to do this stuff," right?
14:48 And no community had, so when you give people forced money, then you take them beyond
14:55 social feedback. You isolate them. They're no longer a part of a community. They are no longer responsible to anyone in that community, and
15:02 they can
15:05 pursue their dysfunction with no
15:07 practical economic repercussions, right? I mean, obviously, they're long-term, it's bad, but, you know, in terms of survival,
15:13 right, my mom's in a rent-controlled apartment with money and free health care, free dental care, and income, and all of that,
15:21 so she doesn't have to listen to anyone, and so she just goes more and more crazy, right?
15:26 It's really, I mean, it's desperately sad. So one of the things that UPB
15:30 was, I say, provoked or was rose in my mind was out of a certain helplessness, so it's funny how
15:36 something which is so anti-UPB, like the welfare state, can produce UPB.
15:41 Philosophy is a kind of funny dance, right? I mean, it's an invention of desperation for the most part, like,
15:47 necessity is the mother of invention, and so I had to make a stronger case for virtue because we don't have
15:56 social or economic authority with regards
15:59 to virtue. Like, in the past, a woman would have to be very choosy about who she married
16:05 because divorce really wasn't an option. I mean, up until the 1960s, divorce in Canada required an act of parliament. Crazy, right?
16:13 So, and women would stick it out, right? They would resist temptation, they would resist gaining weight, and
16:19 and so on, and the men would be more responsible and attempt to please their partners because you can't just divorce and go get someone new.
16:28 And so, alimony, child support, and the welfare state, and free health care, free dental care, like all of the stuff,
16:35 that is handed out like candy now,
16:37 well, now women don't have to be as careful about who they marry so they can pursue,
16:41 you know, sexy, cool, dangerous guys, or whatever it is, and and indulge that
16:46 lower-rent aspect of feminine sexual desire, as men can also just chase after pretty dangerous girls and and all of that.
16:55 And so, by trying to protect people from danger, this is a constant theme in human history, right? To trying to protect people from danger
17:03 makes them, puts them in more danger, right? Puts them in more danger.
17:07 So,
17:09 right now, we still have all of the old impulses to survey those around us for dysfunction,
17:14 because that was essential to our survival. They could be personally dangerous,
17:19 they're consuming extra resources within the tribe,
17:21 they are creating, maybe having kids and raising kids in a way, or not raising them, or
17:27 abandoning them, or neglecting them in a way that's going to cause us a lot of problems down the road.
17:32 So, we are on patrol, right? We are, our minds are always on patrol for
17:37 dysfunction, and this is particularly true for men, because we tended to be the enforcers,
17:43 I should say, certainly among men, women were a little bit more the enforcers among women,
17:47 but we tend to be the enforcers of social standards.
17:50 So,
17:52 you still have all of these instincts to look around you and to evaluate people
17:57 for dysfunction, and the goal of that is that in the past you and the other men or women of the village or both,
18:03 or the tribe, would sit people down and say, "No, you can't, like, you're eating too much, or this is not working out,
18:10 or you've got to pay better attention to your kids,
18:12 or you can't be
18:13 yelling at your wife this loudly, or you can't be fighting with your husband this much," or whatever it is, like, you just, because
18:18 we're all in the same lifeboat. Now, of course,
18:23 we've all been separated from each other because we don't have the combined web of
18:28 financial requirements to
18:31 bind us together, right? So, we're all isolated, we can all go, and, you know, people go crazy in isolation. So, that which was
18:37 designed to
18:40 prevent people from experiencing negative consequences,
18:43 right now has them experience intensely and
18:47 multi-decade negative consequences. Of course, the welfare state was introduced in, to some degree, like, the disability system was introduced to some degree to protect people from the negative
18:56 consequences of getting injured without insurance, right? Get injured, you don't have insurance, it's a bad thing. And
19:01 really, it's not even so much to protect those people directly,
19:04 it's to protect their families, right? Because if you got injured without
19:08 insurance, then your families would have to take care of you. Like, if a woman had a kid out of wedlock,
19:12 it's usually their parents, the kids, the woman's parents, the girl's parents, who would end up having to pay for all of that.
19:17 So, we want to protect people from negative consequences.
19:20 They wanted to protect my mother from negative consequences, the negative consequence of which has been
19:25 that my mother has been going
19:27 mad for decades and lives in
19:31 really a state of irredeemable hell. Like, she can't be rescued.
19:35 Because there's no need for her to submit to any external
19:39 standards or strictures, or, right, because she can just get whatever she wants
19:44 from the state. So, she doesn't have to respond to anyone. She doesn't have to
19:49 control her will according to other people's requirements. And so,
19:54 you have this desire to scan people for dysfunction because you're a man, or you're an adult, or you're a human being, or you're part
20:01 of a, you evolved as part of a society and part of a tribe, where we would scan for these
20:05 dysfunctions in order to do something about them.
20:08 But now we can't do anything about them, and everyone who gets addicted to this stuff, the fiat
20:15 redistribution of stuff, well, when the money runs out, we all know how much suffering has been avoided, right?
20:20 It won't, it'll be terrible. And so, but the last thing that I would say is that, you know, one of the challenges of
20:27 leadership, and when you are
20:29 focusing on other people's dysfunctions, yes, you may be avoiding your own. Yes, you may be having a false sense of superiority.
20:35 I saw that thread, and that could be the case, but I don't know enough about you to know whether that is the case.
20:40 But I will say this,
20:42 that
20:44 being a leader is a complicated business, because you have to be, in a sense,
20:49 hostile to people's smallness, while fully embracing their potential.
20:55 Maybe hostile, I don't know if hostile is the right word. You have to be negative towards
21:00 people's pettiness, but you have to, at the same time, you can't just condemn them outright.
21:05 Because you also have, like, if you have, you know, this is a typical thing in sports movies, right?
21:11 There's some really talented kid who's just kind of lazy, right? This is also the plot of
21:16 Good Will Hunting, of course. So you have a really talented kid who's just lazy and dysfunctional, or this or that or the other or whatever it is, right?
21:22 And the coach, the therapist, the leader, is
21:27 really frustrated and angry at the kid for his laziness or his dysfunction, or frustrated at least,
21:32 but also is fully aware and
21:37 embraces the potential that the kid has. So if you've got some, you're some tennis coach, and the kid has got an
21:42 incredible tennis serve and a great backhand and so on, but just doesn't practice, kind of lazy, then the coach,
21:46 you know, kind of goes crazy, because it's like so much potential, and how do I unlock that potential?
21:51 So you have to be frustrated at
21:53 people's bad decisions, while also embracing their potential for good decisions. And with regards, it's just my own sort of personal experience
22:00 that's going through life, is that I'm, if I find myself frustrated by people's bad decisions,
22:06 I ask myself, am I interested in coaching them to something better?
22:12 In other words, do they, can I, can I embrace the potential in the person, right?
22:18 So, I mean, I did a pretty loud call-in show last night, the one I switched from
22:23 the pleasant blue to the angry red, and
22:26 it was a pretty vociferous and emphatic
22:29 show, because I fully embrace the potential of the audience, right? And just as I fully embrace my own potential,
22:35 and I do get mildly annoyed at my own pettiness sometimes and smallness.
22:39 So, as a leader, and when you judge people negatively, you are, to some degree,
22:45 stepping into, even within your own mind, kind of a leadership role.
22:48 But you have to be frustrated or have a negative experience of people's bad decisions, while also at the same time
22:55 embracing their potential to make great decisions. Like,
22:59 when people, the callers or people who are attending the live streams, when they talk about their dysfunctions,
23:05 I have a negative experience of their dysfunctions,
23:07 but only because I also have a positive embrace of their potential. Just as I have a negative experience of my own dysfunctions,
23:15 like, I don't have a negative experience of my own mediocre singing voice,
23:18 because I'm not a singer, right? And so, I'm not like, "Oh my god, I can't hit that note,
23:23 it's so frustrating." Now, if I was a singer and I could hit that note, if I practiced and worked at it,
23:27 then I would experience some sort of frustration. So, if there's no positive that you're embracing,
23:31 you got to let the negative go, right? If there's no positive potential that you're willing to embrace and inculcate in someone, your negative
23:38 experiences of their dysfunctions, you just got to let it go.
23:41 So, you look at the people at Walmart, say, "Well, am I going to train them, coach them, teach them to be better? Or
23:47 even if it's not them directly, I'm gonna harness this negative experience to promote something positive in the world."
23:52 And if that's not the case,
23:53 I mean, it's just a certain amount of just perspective. If you get the right perspective, often you don't really need
23:58 willpower. So, all you have to do is say, "Will I
24:03 coach them or anyone or this type of person to anything positive?" And if the answer is no, that's not my gig,
24:09 that's not my thing, that's not my preference, that's not my skill set, that's not my desire,
24:12 then you're just gonna have to let them have their
24:15 dysfunctions and
24:17 look at it as just, "This is the result of a very bad system." Like in the same way in the Soviet Union, if you saw
24:22 a bunch of lazy workers, you'd say, "Well,
24:24 I'm not going to coach them into better, and this is just the result of a very bad system."
24:28 And maybe you can do some things to
24:30 oppose the system, sort of verbally, and talk to people about the ethics of the system, rather than blaming the individuals, per se.
24:38 I hope this helps. It's a great question. Thank you so much.
24:40 Freedomain.com/donate if you find these rambles and
24:43 arguments helpful. Freedomain.com/donate. And yeah, join the community. Freedomain.locals.com. Bye.